Critics give Lux a B-Side Breakdown of 76 (C), from 9 reviews at outlets we track. Scores run 60 to 88.
The verdict on Lux
6 of 9 critics liked it. A mixed reception.
- Highest 88 The A.V. Club
- Lowest 60 The Guardian
- Career #17 of Brian Eno's 31 albums with a Breakdown
- By the numbers The fourth best-reviewed Electronic album of 2012 we've tracked.
| The gist | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| The A.V. Club via Wikipediaby Jason Heller | B+ | 88 | 2012 | |
| PopMatters via Wikipediaby Darryl Wright | 8/10 | 80 | 2012 | |
| Pitchfork via Wikipediaby Mark Richardson | 8.0/10 | 80 | 2012 | “Brian Eno's new solo album, first created for an art installation, consists of four tracks spread across 75 minutes. It suggests that there's a reason Eno's name has become synonymous…” |
| NME via Wikipediaby Lucy Jones | 8/10 | 80 | 2012 | “Take the piss out of ex-Roxy Music man Brian Eno all you want – “He’s the Nick Clegg of the music world… an empty vessel”, Manic Street Preachers’ James Dean…” |
| The Independent via Wikipediaby Andy Gill | 4/5 | 80 | 2012 | “Brian Eno has reverted to the long-form ambient style of Music For Airports and Discreet Music, considering Lux the latest extension of his long-term "Music For Thinking" project.” |
| Drowned in Sound via Wikipediaby Marcus J. Moore | 8/10 | 80 | 2012 | “Lux harbours a big sound through a minimal existence. That’s quite the feat for a self-proclaimed ‘non-musician.” |
| Slant via Wikipediaby Jesse Cataldo | 3.5/5 | 70 | 2012 | “Lux functions as a welcome excuse for half-occupied reflection.” |
| AllMusic via Wikipediaby Thom Jurek | 3.5/5 | 70 | 2012 | |
| The Guardian via Wikipediaby Caroline Sullivan | 3/5 | 60 | 2012 | “Brian Eno's latest solo album is a pleasant sound-cloud of synth ambience, but there's not much substance to it, writes Caroline Sullivan” |
Every Sunday: the week's new albums, scored by the critics. Plus our own reviews when we post them. Free, and one click to leave.
Lux in Brian Eno's catalog
How these critics usually treat Brian Eno
- NME Kinder than usual4 points above the other critics here. Usually 20 points below on Brian Eno's other albums (4).
- The Guardian Harsher than usual19 points below the other critics here. Usually 6 points below on Brian Eno's other albums (10).
- PopMatters Harsher than usual4 points above the other critics here. Usually 15 points above on Brian Eno's other albums (8).
- AllMusic Harsher than usual7 points below the other critics here. Usually 1 point above on Brian Eno's other albums (30).
- Drowned in Sound About usual for them4 points above the other critics here. Usually 3 points below on Brian Eno's other albums (6).
- Pitchfork About usual for them4 points above the other critics here. Usually 2 points above on Brian Eno's other albums (30).
More from Brian Eno
← Earlier Drums Between the Bells (2011)Later → Someday World (2014)
More Electronic from around 2012
Would you spin it again?
Be the first to answer. Results show once 3 listeners weigh in.
How the Breakdown works
Every outlet’s score is converted to 0–100 (2/5 is 40, 5.9/10 is 59, a B+ is 88) and averaged. Grades follow the B-Side scale: A is 90–100, B 80–89, C 70–79, D 60–69, F below 60. Approval is the share of critics who scored it 75 or higher; the Breakdown shows green at 75 and up, red below. Divisiveness asks a different question: not how many critics liked it, but how close their scores are to each other. Five critics who all give it 50 are Unanimous, even though none of them liked it. The labels run Unanimous, Broad agreement, Some debate, Divided, and Contentious. Replay rate comes from listeners, not critics: yes counts fully, a few tracks counts half, no counts zero. The gist quotes each outlet’s own summary of its review. Published is the date on the review itself, read from the outlet’s page, so you can see whether an album’s reputation came at release or years later. Scores marked est. come from reviews that publish no number. Scores marked via Wikipedia are archive ratings, mostly for older albums, taken from the “Professional ratings” box on the album’s Wikipedia page (published openly through Wikidata); each links to the original review when we can find it online, and to that Wikipedia entry when we can’t. When an outlet reviewed an album twice, years apart (often for a reissue), both scores count, each labeled with its year.
A-Side marks the critics’ top tier. An album earns it automatically, from its numbers alone: a Breakdown of 90 or higher, from at least 5 reviews, with at least 75% approval. Nobody hands it out and nobody can buy it; if new reviews pull an album below the line, it loses the badge.










Leave a Reply