Early reviews. Based on 7 critics so far. The Breakdown will settle as more outlets weigh in.
By the numbers: Aphex Twin's best-reviewed album here since Selected Ambient Works 85–92 (1992). The second best-reviewed album of 2014 we've tracked.
| The gist | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| AllMusic via Wikipediaby Andy Kellman | 5/5 | 100 | ||
| NME via Wikipediaby Louis Pattison | 9/10 | 90 | ||
| Los Angeles Times via Wikipediaby Randall Roberts | 3.5/4 | 88 | 2014 | “Few artists over the last few decades have as successfully thrived beneath various interfaces as Richard D.” |
| Pitchfork via Wikipediaby Mark Richardson | 8.7/10 | 87 | 2014 | “Aphex Twin's first album since 2001's Drukqs is sixty-five minutes of highly melodic, superbly arranged, precisely mixed, texturally varied electronic music that sounds like it could have come from no…” |
| Rolling Stone via Wikipediaby Will Hermes | 4/5 | 80 | 2014 | “Check out our album review of Artist's Syro on Rolling Stone.com.” |
| The Independent via Wikipediaby Andy Gill | 4/5 | 80 | 2014 | “This is a collection primarily concerned with the somatic rather than cerebral sides of Richard James’s music” |
| The Guardian via Wikipediaby Tim Jonze | 4/5 | 80 | 2014 | “Richard D James’s first album as Aphex Twin for 13 years won’t change the world, but it sees him doing what he does best, which can be jaw-dropping, writes Tim…” |
Every Sunday: the week's new albums, scored by the critics. Plus our own reviews when we post them. Free, and one click to leave.
More from Aphex Twin
More Electronic from around 2014
Would you spin it again?
Be the first to answer. Results show once 3 listeners weigh in.
How the Breakdown works
Every outlet’s score is converted to 0–100 (2/5 is 40, 5.9/10 is 59, a B+ is 88) and averaged. Grades follow the B-Side scale: A is 90–100, B 80–89, C 70–79, D 60–69, F below 60. Approval is the share of critics who scored it 75 or higher; the Breakdown shows green at 75 and up, red below. Divisiveness asks a different question: not how many critics liked it, but how close their scores are to each other. Five critics who all give it 50 are Unanimous, even though none of them liked it. The labels run Unanimous, Broad agreement, Some debate, Divided, and Contentious. Replay rate comes from listeners, not critics: yes counts fully, a few tracks counts half, no counts zero. The gist quotes each outlet’s own summary of its review. Published is the date on the review itself, read from the outlet’s page, so you can see whether an album’s reputation came at release or years later. Scores marked est. come from reviews that publish no number. Scores marked via Wikipedia are archive ratings, mostly for older albums, taken from the “Professional ratings” box on the album’s Wikipedia page (published openly through Wikidata); each links to the original review when we can find it online, and to that Wikipedia entry when we can’t. When an outlet reviewed an album twice, years apart (often for a reissue), both scores count, each labeled with its year.
A-Side marks the critics’ top tier. An album earns it automatically, from its numbers alone: a Breakdown of 90 or higher, from at least 5 reviews, with at least 75% approval. Nobody hands it out and nobody can buy it; if new reviews pull an album below the line, it loses the badge.









Leave a Reply