Early reviews. Critics give Cluster & Eno an early B-Side Breakdown of 75 (C), from 5 reviews so far. It will settle as more outlets weigh in.
The verdict on Cluster & Eno
3 of 5 critics liked it. A mixed reception.
- Highest 90 Spin
- Lowest 60 Spin Alternative Record Guide and Mojo
- Career Tied for #18 of Brian Eno's 31 albums with a Breakdown
| The gist | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Spin via Wikipediaby Andrew Hultkrans | 9/10 | 90 | 2009 | |
| Pitchfork via Wikipediaby Andy Beta | 8.7/10 | 87 | 2016 | “Exploratory yet grounded, futuristic yet melodic, alien and charming, Cluster were among the best krautrock bands ever. This no-frills box set traces their heavenly horizon-to-horizon arc.” |
| AllMusic via Wikipediaby Michael Waynick | 4/5 | 80 | ||
| Spin Alternative Record Guide via Wikipedia | 6/10 | 60 | 2004 | |
| Mojo via Wikipediaby Andrew Male | 3/5 | 60 | 2004 |
Every Sunday: the week's new albums, scored by the critics. Plus our own reviews when we post them. Free, and one click to leave.
Cluster & Eno in Brian Eno's catalog
How these critics usually treat Brian Eno
- Spin Kinder than usual18 points above the other critics here. Usually 1 point below on Brian Eno's other albums (7).
- Mojo Harsher than usual19 points below the other critics here. Usually 1 point below on Brian Eno's other albums (15).
- Pitchfork Kinder than usual15 points above the other critics here. Usually 2 points above on Brian Eno's other albums (30).
- Spin Alternative Record Guide Harsher than usual19 points below the other critics here. Usually 11 points below on Brian Eno's other albums (11).
- AllMusic About usual for them6 points above the other critics here. Usually 1 point above on Brian Eno's other albums (30).
More from Brian Eno
← Earlier Discreet Music (1975)Later → Before and After Science (1977)
More Electronic from around 1977
Would you spin it again?
Be the first to answer. Results show once 3 listeners weigh in.
How the Breakdown works
Every outlet’s score is converted to 0–100 (2/5 is 40, 5.9/10 is 59, a B+ is 88) and averaged. Grades follow the B-Side scale: A is 90–100, B 80–89, C 70–79, D 60–69, F below 60. Approval is the share of critics who scored it 75 or higher; the Breakdown shows green at 75 and up, red below. Divisiveness asks a different question: not how many critics liked it, but how close their scores are to each other. Five critics who all give it 50 are Unanimous, even though none of them liked it. The labels run Unanimous, Broad agreement, Some debate, Divided, and Contentious. Replay rate comes from listeners, not critics: yes counts fully, a few tracks counts half, no counts zero. The gist quotes each outlet’s own summary of its review. Published is the date on the review itself, read from the outlet’s page, so you can see whether an album’s reputation came at release or years later. Scores marked est. come from reviews that publish no number. Scores marked via Wikipedia are archive ratings, mostly for older albums, taken from the “Professional ratings” box on the album’s Wikipedia page (published openly through Wikidata); each links to the original review when we can find it online, and to that Wikipedia entry when we can’t. When an outlet reviewed an album twice, years apart (often for a reissue), both scores count, each labeled with its year.
A-Side marks the critics’ top tier. An album earns it automatically, from its numbers alone: a Breakdown of 90 or higher, from at least 5 reviews, with at least 75% approval. Nobody hands it out and nobody can buy it; if new reviews pull an album below the line, it loses the badge.









Leave a Reply