Zuckerzeit

Cluster – Zuckerzeit: B-Side Breakdown 93 (Heavy Rotation) from 3 critic reviews.

Album cover for Zuckerzeit by Cluster
Released 1974
Shop on AmazonAs an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.
Cluster

Zuckerzeit

93
B-Side BreakdownHeavy Rotation · 3 critics · 100% approval
B-Side Breakdown93Heavy Rotation
Approval100%3 of 3 critics scored it 70 or higher
DivisivenessUnanimousHow close the scores are: most critics land within 10 points of each other

Early reviews. Critics give Zuckerzeit an early B-Side Breakdown of 93 (Heavy Rotation), from 3 reviews so far. It will settle as more outlets weigh in.

The verdict on Zuckerzeit

So far, 3 of 3 critics liked it.

  • Highest 100 Mojo
  • Lowest 90 Pitchfork and AllMusic
  • By the numbers The best-reviewed album of Cluster's career on B-Side Breakdowns, ahead of Sowiesoso (90).
020406080100Pitchfork: 90AllMusic: 90Mojo: 100 Breakdown 93
The gist
Mojo via Wikipediaby Andrew Male 5/5 100 2006
Pitchfork via Wikipediaby Andy Beta 9.0/10 90 2016 “Exploratory yet grounded, futuristic yet melodic, alien and charming, Cluster were among the best krautrock bands ever. This no-frills box set traces their heavenly horizon-to-horizon arc.”
AllMusic via Wikipediaby John Bush 4.5/5 90

Zuckerzeit in Cluster's catalog

70Cluster II (1972): 7272Zuckerzeit (1974): 9393This oneSowiesoso (1976): 909019721976
Cluster's albums by B-Side Breakdown, in release order. Above the dashed line, most critics liked it. Every Cluster album, ranked

More from Cluster

See all Cluster albums ranked

More Electronic from around 1974

Would you spin it again?

Be the first to answer. Results show once 3 listeners weigh in.

How the Breakdown works

Every outlet’s score is converted to 0–100 (2/5 is 40, 5.9/10 is 59) and averaged. A letter grade counts as the star rating it matches across thousands of reviews of the same albums, so a B+ is 75, like four stars, and a B is 65. Verdicts: Heavy Rotation is 85 and up, Keeper 70–84, Mixed Bag 55–69, Back of the Crate below 55. Approval is the share of critics who scored it 70 or higher (7/10, three and a half stars); the Breakdown shows green at 70 and up, red below. Divisiveness asks a different question: not how many critics liked it, but how close their scores are to each other. Five critics who all give it 50 are Unanimous, even though none of them liked it. The labels run Unanimous, Broad agreement, Some debate, Divided, and Contentious. Replay rate comes from listeners, not critics: yes counts fully, a few tracks counts half, no counts zero. The gist quotes each outlet’s own summary of its review. Published is the date on the review itself, read from the outlet’s page, so you can see whether an album’s reputation came at release or years later. Scores marked est. come from reviews that publish no number. Scores marked via Wikipedia are archive ratings, mostly for older albums, taken from the “Professional ratings” box on the album’s Wikipedia page (published openly through Wikidata); each links to the original review when we can find it online, and to that Wikipedia entry when we can’t. When an outlet reviewed an album twice, years apart (often for a reissue), both scores count, each labeled with its year.

A-Side marks the critics’ top tier. An album earns it automatically, from its numbers alone: a Breakdown of 90 or higher, from at least 5 reviews, with at least 75% approval. Nobody hands it out and nobody can buy it; if new reviews pull an album below the line, it loses the badge.

Report a problem


Discover more from B-Side Guys

Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.

Tags:

Leave a Reply