Transatlanticism

Death Cab for Cutie – Transatlanticism: B-Side Breakdown 78 (C+) from 8 critic reviews.

Album cover for Transatlanticism by Death Cab for Cutie
Released September 1, 2003
Shop on AmazonAs an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.
Death Cab for Cutie

Transatlanticism

78
B-Side BreakdownGrade C+ · 8 critics · 63% approval
B-Side Breakdown78Grade: C+
Approval63%5 of 8 critics scored it 75 or higher
DivisivenessSome debateHow close the scores are: most critics land within 24 points of each other

Based on 8 reviews from outlets we track. Scores run 60 to 100.

By the numbers: The best-reviewed album of Death Cab for Cutie's career on B-Side Breakdowns, ahead of Plans (67). Scores ran from 60 (Mojo) to 100 (AllMusic).

020406080100Mojo: 60Pitchfork in 2003: 64Rolling Stone: 70Slant: 80Uncut: 80Pitchfork in 2013: 84Chicago Sun-Times: 88AllMusic: 100 Breakdown 78
AllMusic via Wikipediaby Rob Theakston 5/5 100
Chicago Sun-Times via Wikipediaby Jim DeRogatis 3.5/4 88
Pitchfork in 2013 via Wikipediaby Ian Cohen 8.4/10 84 2013
Slant via Wikipediaby Sal Cinquemani 4/5 80 2003
Uncut via Wikipedia 4/5 80
Rolling Stone via Wikipediaby Teri Tsang 3.5/5 70 2003
Pitchfork in 2003 via Wikipediaby William Morris 6.4/10 64 2003
Mojo via Wikipedia 3/5 60

More from Death Cab for Cutie

See all Death Cab for Cutie albums ranked

More Indie & Alternative from around 2003

Would you spin it again?

Be the first to answer. Results show once 3 listeners weigh in.

How the Breakdown works

Every outlet’s score is converted to 0–100 (2/5 is 40, 5.9/10 is 59, a B+ is 88) and averaged. Grades follow the B-Side scale: A is 90–100, B 80–89, C 70–79, D 60–69, F below 60. Approval is the share of critics who scored it 75 or higher; the Breakdown shows green at 75 and up, red below. Divisiveness asks a different question: not how many critics liked it, but how close their scores are to each other. Five critics who all give it 50 are Unanimous, even though none of them liked it. The labels run Unanimous, Broad agreement, Some debate, Divided, and Contentious. Replay rate comes from listeners, not critics: yes counts fully, a few tracks counts half, no counts zero. The gist quotes each outlet’s own summary of its review. Published is the date on the review itself, read from the outlet’s page, so you can see whether an album’s reputation came at release or years later. Scores marked est. come from reviews that publish no number. Scores marked via Wikipedia are archive ratings, mostly for older albums, taken from the “Professional ratings” box on the album’s Wikipedia page (published openly through Wikidata); each links to the original review when we can find it online, and to that Wikipedia entry when we can’t. When an outlet reviewed an album twice, years apart (often for a reissue), both scores count, each labeled with its year.

A-Side marks the critics’ top tier. An album earns it automatically, from its numbers alone: a Breakdown of 90 or higher, from at least 5 reviews, with at least 75% approval. Nobody hands it out and nobody can buy it; if new reviews pull an album below the line, it loses the badge.

Report a problem

Tags:

Leave a Reply