We Have the Facts and We’re Voting Yes

Death Cab for Cutie – We Have the Facts and We’re Voting Yes: B-Side Breakdown 81 (B-) from 6 critic reviews.

Album cover for We Have the Facts and We’re Voting Yes by Death Cab for Cutie
Released March 21, 2000
Shop on AmazonAs an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.
Death Cab for Cutie

We Have the Facts and We’re Voting Yes

81
B-Side BreakdownGrade B- · 6 critics · 83% approval
B-Side Breakdown81Grade: B-
Approval83%5 of 6 critics scored it 75 or higher
DivisivenessBroad agreementHow close the scores are: most critics land within 18 points of each other

Early reviews. Based on 6 critics so far. The Breakdown will settle as more outlets weigh in.

By the numbers: The best-reviewed album of Death Cab for Cutie's career on B-Side Breakdowns, ahead of Transatlanticism (78). 5 of 6 critics liked it, with NME the lone holdout at 70.

020406080100NME: 70Pitchfork: 75PopMatters: 80Mojo: 80AllMusic: 80Tiny Mix Tapes: 100 Breakdown 81
The gist
Tiny Mix Tapes via Wikipediaby Erik Rader 5/5 100 “At long last, after years of grumbling "Ya call that music? Sounds like noise to me! Now when I was yer age…", the recently-expired decade's milieu of reluctantly-labeled "alternative" musicians…”
PopMatters via Wikipediaby Steve Lichtenstein 8.0/10 80
Mojo via Wikipedia 4/5 80
AllMusic via Wikipediaby Jack Rabid 4/5 80
Pitchfork via Wikipediaby Brent DiCrescenzo 7.5/10 75 2000 “There's something about the Pacific Northwest. Perhaps it's being overshadowed by towering evergreens that instills a modest reverence …”
NME via Wikipedia 7/10 70

More from Death Cab for Cutie

See all Death Cab for Cutie albums ranked

More Indie & Alternative from around 2000

Would you spin it again?

Be the first to answer. Results show once 3 listeners weigh in.

How the Breakdown works

Every outlet’s score is converted to 0–100 (2/5 is 40, 5.9/10 is 59, a B+ is 88) and averaged. Grades follow the B-Side scale: A is 90–100, B 80–89, C 70–79, D 60–69, F below 60. Approval is the share of critics who scored it 75 or higher; the Breakdown shows green at 75 and up, red below. Divisiveness asks a different question: not how many critics liked it, but how close their scores are to each other. Five critics who all give it 50 are Unanimous, even though none of them liked it. The labels run Unanimous, Broad agreement, Some debate, Divided, and Contentious. Replay rate comes from listeners, not critics: yes counts fully, a few tracks counts half, no counts zero. The gist quotes each outlet’s own summary of its review. Published is the date on the review itself, read from the outlet’s page, so you can see whether an album’s reputation came at release or years later. Scores marked est. come from reviews that publish no number. Scores marked via Wikipedia are archive ratings, mostly for older albums, taken from the “Professional ratings” box on the album’s Wikipedia page (published openly through Wikidata); each links to the original review when we can find it online, and to that Wikipedia entry when we can’t. When an outlet reviewed an album twice, years apart (often for a reissue), both scores count, each labeled with its year.

A-Side marks the critics’ top tier. An album earns it automatically, from its numbers alone: a Breakdown of 90 or higher, from at least 5 reviews, with at least 75% approval. Nobody hands it out and nobody can buy it; if new reviews pull an album below the line, it loses the badge.

Report a problem

Tags:

Leave a Reply