Critics give Asphalt Meadows a B-Side Breakdown of 79 (C+), from 10 reviews at outlets we track. Scores run 70 to 90.
The verdict on Asphalt Meadows
8 of 10 critics liked it, and they mostly agree.
- Highest 90 Under the Radar
- Lowest 70 musicOMH
- By the numbers The best-reviewed album of Death Cab for Cutie's career on B-Side Breakdowns, ahead of We Have the Facts and We’re Voting Yes (79).
| Under the Radar via Wikipediaby Austin Saalman | 9/10 | 90 | 2022 |
| PopMatters via Wikipediaby Rick Quinn | 8/10 | 80 | 2022 |
| NME via Wikipediaby Andrew Trendell | 4/5 | 80 | 2022 |
| Exclaim! via Wikipediaby Wesley McLean | 8/10 | 80 | 2022 |
| The Telegraph via Wikipediaby Jen Thomas | 4/5 | 80 | 2022 |
| DIY via Wikipediaby Ben Tipple | 4/5 | 80 | 2022 |
| AllMusic via Wikipediaby Neil Z. Yeung | 4/5 | 80 | 2022 |
| Paste via Wikipediaby Grant Sharples | 7.6/10 | 76 | 2022 |
| Pitchfork via Wikipediaby Ian Cohen | 7.4/10 | 74 | 2022 |
| musicOMH via Wikipediaby John Murphy | 3.5/5 | 70 | 2022 |
Every Sunday: the week's new albums, scored by the critics. Plus our own reviews when we post them. Free, and one click to leave.
Asphalt Meadows in Death Cab for Cutie's catalog
How these critics usually treat Death Cab for Cutie
- NME Kinder than usual1 point above the other critics here. Usually 9 points below on Death Cab for Cutie's other albums (5).
- PopMatters About usual for them1 point above the other critics here. Usually 6 points below on Death Cab for Cutie's other albums (5).
- AllMusic About usual for them1 point above the other critics here. Usually 5 points above on Death Cab for Cutie's other albums (10).
- Pitchfork About usual for them6 points below the other critics here. Usually 8 points below on Death Cab for Cutie's other albums (10).
More from Death Cab for Cutie
More Indie & Alternative from around 2022
Would you spin it again?
Be the first to answer. Results show once 3 listeners weigh in.
How the Breakdown works
Every outlet’s score is converted to 0–100 (2/5 is 40, 5.9/10 is 59, a B+ is 88) and averaged. Grades follow the B-Side scale: A is 90–100, B 80–89, C 70–79, D 60–69, F below 60. Approval is the share of critics who scored it 75 or higher; the Breakdown shows green at 75 and up, red below. Divisiveness asks a different question: not how many critics liked it, but how close their scores are to each other. Five critics who all give it 50 are Unanimous, even though none of them liked it. The labels run Unanimous, Broad agreement, Some debate, Divided, and Contentious. Replay rate comes from listeners, not critics: yes counts fully, a few tracks counts half, no counts zero. The gist quotes each outlet’s own summary of its review. Published is the date on the review itself, read from the outlet’s page, so you can see whether an album’s reputation came at release or years later. Scores marked est. come from reviews that publish no number. Scores marked via Wikipedia are archive ratings, mostly for older albums, taken from the “Professional ratings” box on the album’s Wikipedia page (published openly through Wikidata); each links to the original review when we can find it online, and to that Wikipedia entry when we can’t. When an outlet reviewed an album twice, years apart (often for a reissue), both scores count, each labeled with its year.
A-Side marks the critics’ top tier. An album earns it automatically, from its numbers alone: a Breakdown of 90 or higher, from at least 5 reviews, with at least 75% approval. Nobody hands it out and nobody can buy it; if new reviews pull an album below the line, it loses the badge.










Leave a Reply