Blender’s album reviews that count toward B-Side Breakdowns: 311 reviews of 311 albums, going back to 2002, each next to the album’s Breakdown. 311 of them come from Wikipedia ratings boxes, mostly for older albums.
Print magazine, closed in 2009Top critics
Jon Caramanica 3 reviews
Ann Powers 2 reviews- Josh Eells 2 reviews
- Nick Duerden 1 review
- Clark Collis 1 review
286 reviews with no named critic yet.
What it reviews
- Rock 34%
- Pop 16%
- Hip-Hop & Rap 14%
- Indie & Alternative 11%
- Metal & Punk 9%
By the numbers
70average score it gives, on the 0 to 100 scale (311 reviews)
50%of its reviews score an album 75 or higher
18points: how far a typical review lands from its own average score
40albums given a perfect score (12.9% of its reviews)
26A-Sides reviewed, the albums the critics rate highest
21different critics with a byline on its reviews here
52%of its scores landed within 10 points of the other critics’ average for the same album (311 albums)
How its scores spread
- 0–4937
- 50s4
- 60s97
- 70s20
- 80s111
- 90+42
Its top scores
Its newest 200 reviews
| Critic | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| not named Read the review via Wikipedia | 80 4/5 | 89 | 2020 | |
| not named Read the review via Wikipedia | 80 4/5 | 66 | 2020 | |
| not named Read the review via Wikipedia | 60 3/5 | 73 | 2020 | |
| not named Read the review via Wikipedia | 60 3/5 | 70 | 2020 | |
| not named Read the review via Wikipedia | 80 4/5 | 82 | 2020 | |
| Ann Powers Read the review via Wikipedia | 80 4/5 | 64 | 2020 | |
| not named Read the review via Wikipedia | 60 3/5 | 66 | 2020 | |
| not named Read the review via Wikipedia | 60 3/5 | 68 | 2020 | |
| Nick Duerden Read the review via Wikipedia | 60 3/5 | 64 | 2020 | |
| not named Read the review via Wikipedia | 40 2/5 | 59 | 2020 | |
| Clark Collis Read the review via Wikipedia | 60 3/5 | 67 | 2020 | |
| not named Read the review via Wikipedia | 80 4/5 | 71 | 2020 | |
| not named Read the review via Wikipedia | 60 3/5 | 69 | 2020 | |
| not named Read the review via Wikipedia | 80 4/5 | 80 | 2020 | |
| not named Read the review via Wikipedia | 80 4/5 | 65 | 2020 | |
| not named Read the review via Wikipedia | 100 5/5 | 76 | 2020 | |
| not named Read the review via Wikipedia | 80 4/5 | 74 | 2020 | |
| not named Read the review via Wikipedia | 60 3/5 | 75 | 2020 | |
| not named Read the review via Wikipedia | 80 4/5 | 77 | 2020 | |
| not named Read the review via Wikipedia | 60 3/5 | 80 | 2020 | |
| not named Read the review via Wikipedia | 40 2/5 | 58 | 2020 | |
| not named Read the review via Wikipedia | 60 3/5 | 68 | 2020 | |
| not named Read the review via Wikipedia | 100 5/5 | 88 | 2020 | |
| not named Read the review via Wikipedia | 80 4/5 | 73 | 2020 | |
| not named Read the review via Wikipedia | 80 4/5 | 80 | 2020 | |
| not named Read the review via Wikipedia | 100 5/5 | 100 | 2020 | |
| not named Read the review via Wikipedia | 80 4/5 | 83 | 2020 | |
| not named Read the review via Wikipedia | 100 5/5 | 80 | 2009 | |
| not named Read the review via Wikipedia | 80 4/5 | 69 | 2007 | |
| not named Read the review via Wikipedia | 60 3/5 | 59 | 2005 | |
| not named Read the review via Wikipedia | 40 2/5 | 52 | 2005 | |
| not named Read the review via Wikipedia | 80 4/5 | 92 | 2004 | |
| not named Read the review via Wikipedia | 100 5/5 | 88 | 2002 | |
| not named Read the review via Wikipedia | 40 2/5 | 55 | ||
| not named Read the review via Wikipedia | 40 2/5 | 56 | ||
| not named Read the review via Wikipedia | 60 3/5 | 60 | ||
| not named Read the review via Wikipedia | 80 4/5 | 74 | ||
| not named Read the review via Wikipedia | 80 4/5 | 75 | ||
| not named Read the review via Wikipedia | 80 4/5 | 75 | ||
| not named Read the review via Wikipedia | 60 3/5 | 64 | ||
| not named Read the review via Wikipedia | 80 4/5 | 94 | ||
| not named Read the review via Wikipedia | 80 4/5 | 83 | ||
| not named Read the review via Wikipedia | 60 3/5 | 77 | ||
| not named Read the review via Wikipedia | 100 5/5 | 96 | ||
| not named Read the review via Wikipedia | 80 4/5 | 79 | ||
| not named Read the review via Wikipedia | 80 4/5 | 72 | ||
| not named Read the review via Wikipedia | 80 4/5 | 61 | ||
| not named Read the review via Wikipedia | 60 3/5 | 56 | ||
| not named Read the review via Wikipedia | 60 3/5 | 60 | ||
| not named Read the review via Wikipedia | 60 3/5 | 91 | ||
| not named Read the review via Wikipedia | 80 4/5 | 71 | ||
| not named Read the review via Wikipedia | 40 2/5 | 62 | ||
| not named Read the review via Wikipedia | 80 4/5 | 84 | ||
| not named Read the review via Wikipedia | 60 3/5 | 73 | ||
| not named Read the review via Wikipedia | 50 2/4 | 65 | ||
| not named Read the review via Wikipedia | 80 4/5 | 87 | ||
| not named Read the review via Wikipedia | 40 2/5 | 54 | ||
| Ben Mitchell Read the review via Wikipedia | 20 1/5 | 37 | ||
| not named Read the review via Wikipedia | 60 3/5 | 55 | ||
| not named Read the review via Wikipedia | 80 4/5 | 85 | ||
| not named Read the review via Wikipedia | 60 3/5 | 65 | ||
| not named Read the review via Wikipedia | 20 1/5 | 31 | ||
| not named Read the review via Wikipedia | 70 3.5/5 | 69 | ||
| not named Read the review via Wikipedia | 60 3/5 | 64 | ||
| not named Read the review via Wikipedia | 80 4/5 | 72 | ||
| not named Read the review via Wikipedia | 80 4/5 | 77 | ||
| Jon Dolan Read the review via Wikipedia | 70 3.5/5 | 63 | ||
| not named Read the review via Wikipedia | 60 3/5 | 60 | ||
| not named Read the review via Wikipedia | 80 4/5 | 77 | ||
| not named Read the review via Wikipedia | 80 4/5 | 74 | ||
| not named Read the review via Wikipedia | 60 3/5 | 63 | ||
| not named Read the review via Wikipedia | 20 1/5 | 61 | ||
| not named Read the review via Wikipedia | 60 3/5 | 73 | ||
| not named Read the review via Wikipedia | 60 3/5 | 64 | ||
| Ben Ratliff Read the review via Wikipedia | 80 4/5 | 68 | ||
| not named Read the review via Wikipedia | 70 3.5/5 | 48 | ||
| not named Read the review via Wikipedia | 100 5/5 | 100 | ||
| not named Read the review via Wikipedia | 80 4/5 | 78 | ||
| not named Read the review via Wikipedia | 100 5/5 | 80 | ||
| not named Read the review via Wikipedia | 60 3/5 | 70 | ||
| not named Read the review via Wikipedia | 100 5/5 | 85 | ||
| not named Read the review via Wikipedia | 50 2.5/5 | 78 | ||
| not named Read the review via Wikipedia | 70 3.5/5 | 57 | ||
| not named Read the review via Wikipedia | 80 4/5 | 90 | ||
| not named Read the review via Wikipedia | 60 3/5 | 73 | ||
| not named Read the review via Wikipedia | 100 5/5 | 98 | ||
| not named Read the review via Wikipedia | 80 4/5 | 67 | ||
| not named Read the review via Wikipedia | 80 4/5 | 73 | ||
| not named Read the review via Wikipedia | 80 4/5 | 73 | ||
| not named Read the review via Wikipedia | 40 2/5 | 72 | ||
| not named Read the review via Wikipedia | 80 4/5 | 77 | ||
| not named Read the review via Wikipedia | 60 3/5 | 60 | ||
| not named Read the review via Wikipedia | 80 4/5 | 71 | ||
| not named Read the review via Wikipedia | 40 2/5 | 59 | ||
| Ann Powers Read the review via Wikipedia | 60 3/5 | 77 | ||
| not named Read the review via Wikipedia | 80 4/5 | 79 | ||
| not named Read the review via Wikipedia | 60 3/5 | 70 | ||
| not named Read the review via Wikipedia | 60 3/5 | 82 | ||
| not named Read the review via Wikipedia | 40 2/5 | 52 | ||
| not named Read the review via Wikipedia | 100 5/5 | 83 | ||
| not named Read the review via Wikipedia | 40 2/5 | 52 | ||
| not named Read the review via Wikipedia | 60 3/5 | 68 | ||
| not named Read the review via Wikipedia | 80 4/5 | 71 | ||
| not named Read the review via Wikipedia | 60 3/5 | 69 | ||
| not named Read the review via Wikipedia | 80 4/5 | 84 | ||
| not named Read the review via Wikipedia | 80 4/5 | 74 | ||
| not named Read the review via Wikipedia | 60 3/5 | 54 | ||
| not named Read the review via Wikipedia | 80 4/5 | 75 | ||
| not named Read the review via Wikipedia | 40 2/5 | 64 | ||
| not named Read the review via Wikipedia | 100 5/5 | 83 | ||
| not named Read the review via Wikipedia | 40 2/5 | 54 | ||
| not named Read the review via Wikipedia | 80 4/5 | 80 | ||
| not named Read the review via Wikipedia | 80 4/5 | 80 | ||
| not named Read the review via Wikipedia | 100 5/5 | 90 | ||
| not named Read the review via Wikipedia | 80 4/5 | 78 | ||
| not named Read the review via Wikipedia | 70 3.5/5 | 66 | ||
| not named Read the review via Wikipedia | 80 4/5 | 76 | ||
| not named Read the review via Wikipedia | 60 3/5 | 78 | ||
| not named Read the review via Wikipedia | 80 4/5 | 73 | ||
| not named Read the review via Wikipedia | 60 3/5 | 70 | ||
| not named Read the review via Wikipedia | 60 3/5 | 56 | ||
| not named Read the review via Wikipedia | 60 3/5 | 79 | ||
| not named Read the review via Wikipedia | 80 4/5 | 81 | ||
| Jon Caramanica Read the review via Wikipedia | 80 4/5 | 79 | ||
| not named Read the review via Wikipedia | 100 5/5 | 84 | ||
| not named Read the review via Wikipedia | 70 3.5/5 | 75 | ||
| not named Read the review via Wikipedia | 60 3/5 | 73 | ||
| Jon Caramanica Read the review via Wikipedia | 60 3/5 | 64 | ||
| not named Read the review via Wikipedia | 100 5/5 | 98 | ||
| not named Read the review via Wikipedia | 60 3/5 | 70 | ||
| not named Read the review via Wikipedia | 70 3.5/5 | 72 | ||
| not named Read the review via Wikipedia | 80 4/5 | 78 | ||
| not named Read the review via Wikipedia | 80 4/5 | 88 | ||
| not named Read the review via Wikipedia | 80 4/5 | 65 | ||
| not named Read the review via Wikipedia | 60 3/5 | 77 | ||
| not named Read the review via Wikipedia | 80 4/5 | 58 | ||
| not named Read the review via Wikipedia | 30 1.5/5 | 35 | ||
| not named Read the review via Wikipedia | 80 4/5 | 91 | ||
| not named Read the review via Wikipedia | 60 3/5 | 68 | ||
| not named Read the review via Wikipedia | 80 4/5 | 89 | ||
| not named Read the review via Wikipedia | 100 5/5 | 87 | ||
| not named Read the review via Wikipedia | 80 4/5 | 94 | ||
| not named Read the review via Wikipedia | 70 3.5/5 | 84 | ||
| Billy Altman Read the review via Wikipedia | 80 4/5 | 79 | ||
| not named Read the review via Wikipedia | 60 3/5 | 69 | ||
| not named Read the review via Wikipedia | 60 3/5 | 66 | ||
| not named Read the review via Wikipedia | 50 2.5/5 | 57 | ||
| Paul Du Noyer Read the review via Wikipedia | 60 3/5 | 81 | ||
| not named Read the review via Wikipedia | 40 2/5 | 44 | ||
| not named Read the review via Wikipedia | 60 3/5 | 63 | ||
| not named Read the review via Wikipedia | 70 3.5/5 | 52 | ||
| not named Read the review via Wikipedia | 60 3/5 | 70 | ||
| not named Read the review via Wikipedia | 60 3/5 | 67 | ||
| not named Read the review via Wikipedia | 40 2/5 | 59 | ||
| not named Read the review via Wikipedia | 100 5/5 | 93 | ||
| not named Read the review via Wikipedia | 70 3.5/5 | 64 | ||
| not named Read the review via Wikipedia | 80 4/5 | 72 | ||
| not named Read the review via Wikipedia | 80 4/5 | 73 | ||
| not named Read the review via Wikipedia | 40 2/5 | 57 | ||
| Jon Pareles Read the review via Wikipedia | 80 4/5 | 78 | ||
| not named Read the review via Wikipedia | 80 4/5 | 73 | ||
| not named Read the review via Wikipedia | 70 3.5/5 | 75 | ||
| not named Read the review via Wikipedia | 40 2/5 | 42 | ||
| not named Read the review via Wikipedia | 60 3/5 | 68 | ||
| not named Read the review via Wikipedia | 60 3/5 | 66 | ||
| not named Read the review via Wikipedia | 60 3/5 | 60 | ||
| not named Read the review via Wikipedia | 80 4/5 | 69 | ||
| not named Read the review via Wikipedia | 60 3/5 | 67 | ||
| not named Read the review via Wikipedia | 60 3/5 | 75 | ||
| not named Read the review via Wikipedia | 80 4/5 | 71 | ||
| not named Read the review via Wikipedia | 100 5/5 | 97 | ||
| not named Read the review via Wikipedia | 80 4/5 | 77 | ||
| not named Read the review via Wikipedia | 90 4.5/5 | 70 | ||
| Jonah Weiner Read the review via Wikipedia | 60 3/5 | 76 | ||
| Chuck Eddy Read the review via Wikipedia | 70 3.5/5 | 79 | ||
| not named Read the review via Wikipedia | 60 3/5 | 81 | ||
| not named Read the review via Wikipedia | 60 3/5 | 74 | ||
| not named Read the review via Wikipedia | 60 3/5 | 73 | ||
| not named Read the review via Wikipedia | 60 3/5 | 65 | ||
| not named Read the review via Wikipedia | 40 2/5 | 74 | ||
| not named Read the review via Wikipedia | 60 3/5 | 60 | ||
| not named Read the review via Wikipedia | 100 5/5 | 96 | ||
| Douglas Wolk Read the review via Wikipedia | 80 4/5 | 79 | ||
| not named Read the review via Wikipedia | 60 3/5 | 75 | ||
| not named Read the review via Wikipedia | 80 4/5 | 66 | ||
| not named Read the review via Wikipedia | 60 3/5 | 58 | ||
| not named Read the review via Wikipedia | 60 3/5 | 76 | ||
| not named Read the review via Wikipedia | 40 2/5 | 51 | ||
| not named Read the review via Wikipedia | 60 3/5 | 50 | ||
| not named Read the review via Wikipedia | 60 3/5 | 56 | ||
| not named Read the review via Wikipedia | 40 2/5 | 40 | ||
| not named Read the review via Wikipedia | 70 3.5/5 | 51 | ||
| not named Read the review via Wikipedia | 60 3/5 | 66 | ||
| not named Read the review via Wikipedia | 100 5/5 | 83 | ||
| Josh Eells Read the review via Wikipedia | 40 2/5 | 54 | ||
| Joseph Patel Read the review via Wikipedia | 80 4/5 | 79 | ||
| not named Read the review via Wikipedia | 70 3.5/5 | 71 | ||
| not named Read the review via Wikipedia | 80 4/5 | 81 | ||
| not named Read the review via Wikipedia | 100 5/5 | 92 | ||
| not named Read the review via Wikipedia | 100 5/5 | 89 |
