God’s Son

Nas – God’s Son: B-Side Breakdown 81 (B-) from 9 critic reviews.

Album cover for God’s Son by Nas
Released December 13, 2002
Shop on AmazonAs an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.
Nas

God’s Son

81
B-Side BreakdownGrade B- · 9 critics · 89% approval
B-Side Breakdown81Grade: B-
Approval89%8 of 9 critics scored it 75 or higher
DivisivenessBroad agreementHow close the scores are: most critics land within 16 points of each other

Based on 9 reviews from outlets we track. Scores run 60 to 88.

By the numbers: Nas's best-reviewed album here since Illmatic (1994). The second best-reviewed Hip-Hop & Rap album of 2002 we've tracked.

020406080100Rolling Stone: 60NME: 80Q: 80AllMusic: 80Blender: 80Entertainment Weekly: 85Pitchfork: 86Stylus Magazine: 88Los Angeles Times: 88 Breakdown 81
The gist
Stylus Magazine via Wikipedia B+ 88
Los Angeles Times via Wikipedia 3.5/4 88
Pitchfork via Wikipedia 8.6/10 86 “Unlike other MCs who rose to prominence in the early 90s, Nasir Jones (aka Nas) had the artistic misfortune to …”
Entertainment Weekly via Wikipedia B 85
NME via Wikipedia 4/5 80 “Now that hip-hop has become a kind of global language, responsibility rests even heavier on the shoulders of rappers than before. Although intrinsically rebellious, and hardly the stuff role models…”
Q via Wikipedia 4/5 80
AllMusic via Wikipedia 4/5 80
Blender via Wikipedia 4/5 80 “The authority on kitchen blender appliance for the home or business, providing expert blender reviews to help consumers make the best buying decision.”
Rolling Stone via Wikipedia 3/5 60 “Check out our album review of Artist's God's Son on Rolling Stone.com.”

More from Nas

See all Nas albums ranked

More Hip-Hop & Rap from around 2002

Would you spin it again?

Be the first to answer. Results show once 3 listeners weigh in.

How the Breakdown works

Every outlet’s score is converted to 0–100 (2/5 is 40, 5.9/10 is 59, a B+ is 88) and averaged. Grades follow the B-Side scale: A is 90–100, B 80–89, C 70–79, D 60–69, F below 60. Approval is the share of critics who scored it 75 or higher; the Breakdown shows green at 75 and up, red below. Divisiveness asks a different question: not how many critics liked it, but how close their scores are to each other. Five critics who all give it 50 are Unanimous, even though none of them liked it. The labels run Unanimous, Broad agreement, Some debate, Divided, and Contentious. Replay rate comes from listeners, not critics: yes counts fully, a few tracks counts half, no counts zero. The gist quotes each outlet’s own summary of its review. Published is the date on the review itself, read from the outlet’s page, so you can see whether an album’s reputation came at release or years later. Scores marked est. come from reviews that publish no number. Scores marked via Wikipedia are archive ratings, mostly for older albums, taken from the “Professional ratings” box on the album’s Wikipedia page (published openly through Wikidata); each links to the original review when we can find it online, and to that Wikipedia entry when we can’t. When an outlet reviewed an album twice, years apart (often for a reissue), both scores count, each labeled with its year.

A-Side marks the critics’ top tier. An album earns it automatically, from its numbers alone: a Breakdown of 85 or higher, from at least 5 reviews, with at least 75% approval. Nobody hands it out and nobody can buy it; if new reviews pull an album below the line, it loses the badge.

Report a problem

Tags:

Leave a Reply