Based on 12 reviews from outlets we track. Scores run 60 to 90.
By the numbers: The fifth best-reviewed Hip-Hop & Rap album of 2010 we've tracked.
| The gist | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Slant | 4.5/5 | 90 | “It feels almost vain to describe individual tracks, because every last note on Distant Relatives blends to form a seamless, cohesive whole.” | |
| The A.V. Club via Wikipediaby Nathan Rabin | B | 85 | 2010 | “Nas and Damian Marley: Distant Relatives” |
| The Guardian via Wikipediaby Dave Simpson | 4/5 | 80 | 2010 | “Dave Simpson finds a musical journey from hip-hop back to Africa, via Jamiaca, hard to deny” |
| Mojo via Wikipedia | 4/5 | 80 | 2009 | |
| The Telegraph via Wikipediaby Gervase de Wilde | 4/5 | 80 | ||
| AllMusic via Wikipedia | 4/5 | 80 | 2009 | |
| musicOMHby Talia Soghomonian | 4/5 | 80 | 2010 | “On the opening track of Distant Relatives, Nas declares that he and Damian Marley are the kings of their respective musical genres. Perhaps a cocky claim,” |
| Beats Per Minute | 73% | 73 | “Music News, Reviews, Interviews, Videos and MP3s” | |
| PopMatters | 7/10 | 70 | “Five years ago, Nasty Nas and Damian "Junior Gong" Marley hooked up for "Road to Zion", a one-off on Marley's debut LP, Welcome to Jamrock, that clearly” | |
| Pitchfork via Wikipediaby Tom Breihan | 6.1/10 | 61 | 2010 | “Hip-hop and reggae stars follow their excellent "As We Enter" single with a full LP. This summer's jam-band festgoers are going to love it.” |
| Spin via Wikipediaby J Gabriel Boylan | 6/10 | 60 | 2010 | “After a 2005 collaboration on the pensive, pleasant "Road to Zion," from Marley's Welcome to Jamrock album, Bob's youngest son and Nas concoct an entire” |
| Rolling Stone via Wikipediaby Christian Hoard | 3/5 | 60 | 2010 | “Check out our album review of Artist's Distant Relatives on Rolling Stone.com.” |
Every Sunday: the week's new albums, scored by the critics. Plus our own reviews when we post them. Free, and one click to leave.
More from Nas
More Hip-Hop & Rap from around 2010
Would you spin it again?
Be the first to answer. Results show once 3 listeners weigh in.
How the Breakdown works
Every outlet’s score is converted to 0–100 (2/5 is 40, 5.9/10 is 59, a B+ is 88) and averaged. Grades follow the B-Side scale: A is 90–100, B 80–89, C 70–79, D 60–69, F below 60. Approval is the share of critics who scored it 75 or higher; the Breakdown shows green at 75 and up, red below. Divisiveness asks a different question: not how many critics liked it, but how close their scores are to each other. Five critics who all give it 50 are Unanimous, even though none of them liked it. The labels run Unanimous, Broad agreement, Some debate, Divided, and Contentious. Replay rate comes from listeners, not critics: yes counts fully, a few tracks counts half, no counts zero. The gist quotes each outlet’s own summary of its review. Published is the date on the review itself, read from the outlet’s page, so you can see whether an album’s reputation came at release or years later. Scores marked est. come from reviews that publish no number. Scores marked via Wikipedia are archive ratings, mostly for older albums, taken from the “Professional ratings” box on the album’s Wikipedia page (published openly through Wikidata); each links to the original review when we can find it online, and to that Wikipedia entry when we can’t. When an outlet reviewed an album twice, years apart (often for a reissue), both scores count, each labeled with its year.
A-Side marks the critics’ top tier. An album earns it automatically, from its numbers alone: a Breakdown of 90 or higher, from at least 5 reviews, with at least 75% approval. Nobody hands it out and nobody can buy it; if new reviews pull an album below the line, it loses the badge.










Leave a Reply