Based on 10 reviews from outlets we track. Scores run 40 to 80.
By the numbers: Scores ran from 40 (Uncut) to 80 (The Guardian).
| The gist | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Blender via Wikipedia | 4/5 | 80 | 2020 | “The authority on kitchen blender appliance for the home or business, providing expert blender reviews to help consumers make the best buying decision.” |
| The Guardian via Wikipedia | 4/5 | 80 | 2004 | |
| musicOMH | 4/5 | 80 | “After the outrage that Nipplegate instigated and the ongoing problems with Michael, there's a fair bit of pressure on the Jackson camp. But it seems this” | |
| Entertainment Weekly via Wikipedia | C+ | 78 | ||
| Pitchfork | 7.8/10 | 78 | “Each Sunday, Pitchfork takes an in-depth look at a significant album from the past, and any record not in our archives is eligible. Today, we revisit Janet Jackson’s 2004 album,…” | |
| Q via Wikipedia | 3/5 | 60 | 2005 | |
| Slant | 3/5 | 60 | “The album features a slew of the gooey, structureless sex ballads that have become Janet’s staple.” | |
| Rolling Stone via Wikipedia | 2/5 | 40 | 2004 | “Check out our album review of Artist's Damita Jo on Rolling Stone.com.” |
| AllMusic via Wikipedia | 2/5 | 40 | ||
| Uncut | 4/10 | 40 | “Stats show that Middle America's "mass moral outrage" at Janet's Superbowl boob-bearing came from a noisy couple of hundred. Her career may survive, then, though no thanks to this year's…” |
More from Janet Jackson
More R&B & Soul from around 2004
Would you spin it again?
Be the first to answer. Results show once 3 listeners weigh in.
How the Breakdown works
Every outlet’s score is converted to 0–100 (2/5 is 40, 5.9/10 is 59, a B+ is 88) and averaged. Grades follow the B-Side scale: A is 90–100, B 80–89, C 70–79, D 60–69, F below 60. Approval is the share of critics who scored it 75 or higher; the Breakdown shows green at 75 and up, red below. Divisiveness asks a different question: not how many critics liked it, but how close their scores are to each other. Five critics who all give it 50 are Unanimous, even though none of them liked it. The labels run Unanimous, Broad agreement, Some debate, Divided, and Contentious. Replay rate comes from listeners, not critics: yes counts fully, a few tracks counts half, no counts zero. The gist quotes each outlet’s own summary of its review. Published is the date on the review itself, read from the outlet’s page, so you can see whether an album’s reputation came at release or years later. Scores marked est. come from reviews that publish no number. Scores marked via Wikipedia are archive ratings, mostly for older albums, taken from the “Professional ratings” box on the album’s Wikipedia page (published openly through Wikidata); each links to the original review when we can find it online, and to that Wikipedia entry when we can’t. When an outlet reviewed an album twice, years apart (often for a reissue), both scores count, each labeled with its year.
A-Side marks the critics’ top tier. An album earns it automatically, from its numbers alone: a Breakdown of 85 or higher, from at least 5 reviews, with at least 75% approval. Nobody hands it out and nobody can buy it; if new reviews pull an album below the line, it loses the badge.









Leave a Reply