Janet Jackson’s Rhythm Nation 1814

Janet Jackson – Janet Jackson’s Rhythm Nation 1814: B-Side Breakdown 79 (C+) from 8 critic reviews.

Album cover for Janet Jackson’s Rhythm Nation 1814 by Janet Jackson
Released September 15, 1989
Shop on AmazonAs an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.
Janet Jackson

Janet Jackson’s Rhythm Nation 1814

79
B-Side BreakdownGrade C+ · 8 critics · 63% approval
B-Side Breakdown79Grade: C+
Approval63%5 of 8 critics scored it 75 or higher
DivisivenessDividedHow close the scores are: most critics land within 30 points of each other

Based on 8 reviews from outlets we track. Scores run 60 to 100.

By the numbers: Janet Jackson's best-reviewed album here since Control (1986). Scores ran from 60 (NME) to 100 (Slant).

020406080100Q: 60Los Angeles Times: 60NME: 60Rolling Stone: 80Pitchfork: 90AllMusic: 90Robert Christgau: 91Slant: 100 Breakdown 79
The gist
Slant via Wikipedia 5/5 100 “Prejudice? No! Ignorance? No! Bigotry? No! Illiteracy? A tad.”
Robert Christgau via Wikipedia A- 91
Pitchfork via Wikipedia 9.0/10 90 “After her 1986 album Control and its assertion of her identity as an artist, Janet Jackson was thinking big. Rhythm Nation 1814 is a thrilling mix of social messaging and…”
AllMusic via Wikipedia 4.5/5 90
Rolling Stone via Wikipedia 4/5 80 “Check out our album review of Artist's Rhythm Nation 1814 on Rolling Stone.com.”
Q via Wikipedia 3/5 60
Los Angeles Times via Wikipedia 3/5 60 “If you were looking for more great dance music from Jackson–a "Control II" perhaps–you may be disappointed by this transition album.”
NME via Wikipedia 6/10 60

More from Janet Jackson

See all Janet Jackson albums ranked

More R&B & Soul from around 1989

Would you spin it again?

Be the first to answer. Results show once 3 listeners weigh in.

How the Breakdown works

Every outlet’s score is converted to 0–100 (2/5 is 40, 5.9/10 is 59, a B+ is 88) and averaged. Grades follow the B-Side scale: A is 90–100, B 80–89, C 70–79, D 60–69, F below 60. Approval is the share of critics who scored it 75 or higher; the Breakdown shows green at 75 and up, red below. Divisiveness asks a different question: not how many critics liked it, but how close their scores are to each other. Five critics who all give it 50 are Unanimous, even though none of them liked it. The labels run Unanimous, Broad agreement, Some debate, Divided, and Contentious. Replay rate comes from listeners, not critics: yes counts fully, a few tracks counts half, no counts zero. The gist quotes each outlet’s own summary of its review. Published is the date on the review itself, read from the outlet’s page, so you can see whether an album’s reputation came at release or years later. Scores marked est. come from reviews that publish no number. Scores marked via Wikipedia are archive ratings, mostly for older albums, taken from the “Professional ratings” box on the album’s Wikipedia page (published openly through Wikidata); each links to the original review when we can find it online, and to that Wikipedia entry when we can’t. When an outlet reviewed an album twice, years apart (often for a reissue), both scores count, each labeled with its year.

A-Side marks the critics’ top tier. An album earns it automatically, from its numbers alone: a Breakdown of 85 or higher, from at least 5 reviews, with at least 75% approval. Nobody hands it out and nobody can buy it; if new reviews pull an album below the line, it loses the badge.

Report a problem

Tags:

Leave a Reply