Scissor Sisters

Scissor Sisters – Scissor Sisters: B-Side Breakdown 77 (C+) from 12 critic reviews.

Album cover for Scissor Sisters by Scissor Sisters
Released February 2, 2004
Shop on AmazonAs an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.
Scissor Sisters

Scissor Sisters

77
B-Side BreakdownGrade C+ · 12 critics · 75% approval
B-Side Breakdown77Grade: C+
Approval75%9 of 12 critics scored it 75 or higher
DivisivenessDividedHow close the scores are: most critics land within 34 points of each other

Based on 12 reviews from outlets we track. Scores run 40 to 100.

By the numbers: The best-reviewed album of Scissor Sisters's career on B-Side Breakdowns, ahead of Ta-Dah (74). Scores ran from 40 (Mojo) to 100 (Uncut).

020406080100Mojo: 40Slant: 50Rolling Stone: 60musicOMH: 80Q: 80Blender: 80The Guardian: 80Pitchfork: 83Robert Christgau: 88NME: 90AllMusic: 90Uncut: 100 Breakdown 77
The gist
Uncut via Wikipedia 5/5 100
NME via Wikipedia 9/10 90
AllMusic via Wikipedia 4.5/5 90
Robert Christgau via Wikipedia B+ 88
Pitchfork via Wikipedia 8.3/10 83 2004 “There's something about the kitchen-sink approach to music that makes me suspicious. Excessive genre-hoppingn or wearing stylistic flexibility …”
musicOMHby David Rafaello 4/5 80 2004 “A first impression – derived from the opening track Laura – is that Scissor Sisters are typically sassy New Yorkers with a preciously high opinion of”
Q via Wikipedia 4/5 80 2004
Blender via Wikipedia 4/5 80 2020 “The authority on kitchen blender appliance for the home or business, providing expert blender reviews to help consumers make the best buying decision.”
The Guardian via Wikipedia 4/5 80 2004
Rolling Stone via Wikipedia 3/5 60
Slantby Jonathan Keefe 2.5/5 50 2012 “If there’s one thing Scissor Sisters have never wanted for, it’s a distinct voice.”
Mojo via Wikipedia 2/5 40 2004

More from Scissor Sisters

See all Scissor Sisters albums ranked

More Pop from around 2004

Would you spin it again?

Be the first to answer. Results show once 3 listeners weigh in.

How the Breakdown works

Every outlet’s score is converted to 0–100 (2/5 is 40, 5.9/10 is 59, a B+ is 88) and averaged. Grades follow the B-Side scale: A is 90–100, B 80–89, C 70–79, D 60–69, F below 60. Approval is the share of critics who scored it 75 or higher; the Breakdown shows green at 75 and up, red below. Divisiveness asks a different question: not how many critics liked it, but how close their scores are to each other. Five critics who all give it 50 are Unanimous, even though none of them liked it. The labels run Unanimous, Broad agreement, Some debate, Divided, and Contentious. Replay rate comes from listeners, not critics: yes counts fully, a few tracks counts half, no counts zero. The gist quotes each outlet’s own summary of its review. Published is the date on the review itself, read from the outlet’s page, so you can see whether an album’s reputation came at release or years later. Scores marked est. come from reviews that publish no number. Scores marked via Wikipedia are archive ratings, mostly for older albums, taken from the “Professional ratings” box on the album’s Wikipedia page (published openly through Wikidata); each links to the original review when we can find it online, and to that Wikipedia entry when we can’t. When an outlet reviewed an album twice, years apart (often for a reissue), both scores count, each labeled with its year.

A-Side marks the critics’ top tier. An album earns it automatically, from its numbers alone: a Breakdown of 90 or higher, from at least 5 reviews, with at least 75% approval. Nobody hands it out and nobody can buy it; if new reviews pull an album below the line, it loses the badge.

Report a problem

Tags:

Leave a Reply