Franz Ferdinand

Franz Ferdinand – Franz Ferdinand: B-Side Breakdown 89 (B+) from 9 critic reviews.

Album cover for Franz Ferdinand by Franz Ferdinand
Released February 9, 2004
Shop on AmazonAs an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.
Franz Ferdinand

Franz Ferdinand

89 A-Side: the critics' top tier
B-Side BreakdownGrade B+ · 9 critics · 89% approval
B-Side Breakdown89Grade: B+
Approval89%8 of 9 critics scored it 75 or higher
DivisivenessSome debateHow close the scores are: most critics land within 20 points of each other

Based on 9 reviews from outlets we track. Scores run 70 to 100.

By the numbers: The best-reviewed album of Franz Ferdinand's career on B-Side Breakdowns, ahead of You Could Have It So Much Better (84). The third best-reviewed album of 2004 we've tracked.

020406080100Rolling Stone: 70Mojo: 80Q: 80Los Angeles Times: 88NME: 90Pitchfork: 91Uncut: 100The Guardian: 100AllMusic: 100 Breakdown 89
The gist
Uncut via Wikipedia 5/5 100
The Guardian via Wikipedia 5/5 100 2004
AllMusic via Wikipedia 5/5 100
Pitchfork via Wikipedia 9.1/10 91 2004
NME via Wikipedia 9/10 90 2005
Los Angeles Times via Wikipedia 3.5/4 88 2004
Mojo via Wikipedia 4/5 80 2004
Q via Wikipedia 4/5 80
Rolling Stone via Wikipedia 3.5/5 70 2004 “Check out our album review of Artist's Franz Ferdinand on Rolling Stone.com.”

More from Franz Ferdinand

See all Franz Ferdinand albums ranked

More Pop from around 2004

Would you spin it again?

Be the first to answer. Results show once 3 listeners weigh in.

How the Breakdown works

Every outlet’s score is converted to 0–100 (2/5 is 40, 5.9/10 is 59, a B+ is 88) and averaged. Grades follow the B-Side scale: A is 90–100, B 80–89, C 70–79, D 60–69, F below 60. Approval is the share of critics who scored it 75 or higher; the Breakdown shows green at 75 and up, red below. Divisiveness asks a different question: not how many critics liked it, but how close their scores are to each other. Five critics who all give it 50 are Unanimous, even though none of them liked it. The labels run Unanimous, Broad agreement, Some debate, Divided, and Contentious. Replay rate comes from listeners, not critics: yes counts fully, a few tracks counts half, no counts zero. The gist quotes each outlet’s own summary of its review. Published is the date on the review itself, read from the outlet’s page, so you can see whether an album’s reputation came at release or years later. Scores marked est. come from reviews that publish no number. Scores marked via Wikipedia are archive ratings, mostly for older albums, taken from the “Professional ratings” box on the album’s Wikipedia page (published openly through Wikidata); each links to the original review when we can find it online, and to that Wikipedia entry when we can’t. When an outlet reviewed an album twice, years apart (often for a reissue), both scores count, each labeled with its year.

A-Side marks the critics’ top tier. An album earns it automatically, from its numbers alone: a Breakdown of 85 or higher, from at least 5 reviews, with at least 75% approval. Nobody hands it out and nobody can buy it; if new reviews pull an album below the line, it loses the badge.

Report a problem

Tags:

Leave a Reply