Based on 10 reviews from outlets we track. Scores run 50 to 91.
By the numbers: Scores ran from 50 (PopMatters) to 91 (Entertainment Weekly).
| The gist | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Entertainment Weekly via Wikipedia | A- | 91 | ||
| Slant via Wikipedia | 4.5/5 | 90 | “Ta-Dah isn’t an unimpeachable triumph from front to back, but it’s a hell of a good showing.” | |
| Spin via Wikipedia | 8/10 | 80 | “Scissor Sisters once lamented that "there ain't no tits on the radio" — a scientific observation on the limits of sound, sure, but also a comment on the” | |
| The Guardian via Wikipedia | 4/5 | 80 | ||
| Stylus Magazine via Wikipediaby Mallory O'Donnell | C | 75 | ||
| Los Angeles Times via Wikipedia | 3/4 | 75 | “The nature of male desire is explored with subtlety, delicacy and cathartic elan in a trio of intriguing, idiosyncratic efforts.” | |
| Pitchfork via Wikipedia | 7.3/10 | 73 | “The second album from the disco-tinged group is even more streamlined, pop-minded, and high-spirited than its 2004 self-titled debut.” | |
| AllMusic via Wikipedia | 3.5/5 | 70 | ||
| Rolling Stone via Wikipedia | 3/5 | 60 | ||
| PopMatters | 5/10 | 50 | 2006 | “Despite its title, Ta-Dah offers few surprises. For Scissor Sisters, that's not entirely a demerit. Their debut album proved that Jake Shears and company” |
Every Sunday: the week's new albums, scored by the critics. Plus our own reviews when we post them. Free, and one click to leave.
More from Scissor Sisters
More Rock from around 2006
Would you spin it again?
Be the first to answer. Results show once 3 listeners weigh in.
How the Breakdown works
Every outlet’s score is converted to 0–100 (2/5 is 40, 5.9/10 is 59, a B+ is 88) and averaged. Grades follow the B-Side scale: A is 90–100, B 80–89, C 70–79, D 60–69, F below 60. Approval is the share of critics who scored it 75 or higher; the Breakdown shows green at 75 and up, red below. Divisiveness asks a different question: not how many critics liked it, but how close their scores are to each other. Five critics who all give it 50 are Unanimous, even though none of them liked it. The labels run Unanimous, Broad agreement, Some debate, Divided, and Contentious. Replay rate comes from listeners, not critics: yes counts fully, a few tracks counts half, no counts zero. The gist quotes each outlet’s own summary of its review. Published is the date on the review itself, read from the outlet’s page, so you can see whether an album’s reputation came at release or years later. Scores marked est. come from reviews that publish no number. Scores marked via Wikipedia are archive ratings, mostly for older albums, taken from the “Professional ratings” box on the album’s Wikipedia page (published openly through Wikidata); each links to the original review when we can find it online, and to that Wikipedia entry when we can’t. When an outlet reviewed an album twice, years apart (often for a reissue), both scores count, each labeled with its year.
A-Side marks the critics’ top tier. An album earns it automatically, from its numbers alone: a Breakdown of 90 or higher, from at least 5 reviews, with at least 75% approval. Nobody hands it out and nobody can buy it; if new reviews pull an album below the line, it loses the badge.







Leave a Reply