Critics give Oczy Mlody a B-Side Breakdown of 71 (C-), from 9 reviews at outlets we track. Scores run 60 to 90.
The verdict on Oczy Mlody
4 of 9 critics liked it. A mixed reception.
- Highest 90 Slant
- Lowest 60 Rolling Stone, Mojo and NME
- Career #12 of The Flaming Lips's 19 albums with a Breakdown
| The gist | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Slant via Wikipediaby Jonathan Wroble | 4.5/5 | 90 | 2017 | “Oczy Mlody is a masterstroke of rhythm and tone that neither trips head-on into bliss nor spins into dismay.” |
| The Independent via Wikipediaby Andy Gill | 4/5 | 80 | 2017 | “Also Flo Morrissey & Matthew E White – Gentlewoman, Ruby Man, Rick Wakeman – Piano Portraits, and Aaron Lee Tasjan – Silver Tears” |
| Clash via Wikipediaby Joe Rivers | 8/10 | 80 | 2017 | “Wayne Coyne has described ‘Oczy Mlody’ as sounding “like Syd Barrett meets A$AP Rocky”. Given that conjures up thoughts of an” |
| The Guardian via Wikipediaby Dave Simpson | 4/5 | 80 | 2017 | |
| AllMusic via Wikipediaby Heather Phares | 3.5/5 | 70 | 2017 | |
| Pitchfork via Wikipediaby Stuart Berman | 6.2/10 | 62 | 2017 | “Miley Cyrus only appears once on the Flaming Lips’ claustrophobic new full-length, but the record wouldn’t sound the way it does without her presence in their lives.” |
| Rolling Stone via Wikipediaby Kory Grow | 3/5 | 60 | 2017 | “Our take on psych-rock veterans' 14th album.” |
| Mojo via Wikipedia | 3/5 | 60 | 2016 | |
| NME via Wikipediaby Mark Beaumont | 3/5 | 60 | 2017 | “Future funk, psychedelic krautrock, goblin pop and, for real, loads more. The Flaming Lips new album is as weird as you hoped.” |
Every Sunday: the week's new albums, scored by the critics. Plus our own reviews when we post them. Free, and one click to leave.
Oczy Mlody in The Flaming Lips's catalog
How these critics usually treat The Flaming Lips
- Slant Kinder than usual21 points above the other critics here. Usually 18 points below on The Flaming Lips's other albums (5).
- NME Harsher than usual13 points below the other critics here. Usually 6 points above on The Flaming Lips's other albums (12).
- The Guardian Kinder than usual10 points above the other critics here. Usually 3 points below on The Flaming Lips's other albums (6).
- AllMusic About usual for them2 points below the other critics here. Usually 4 points above on The Flaming Lips's other albums (17).
- The Independent About usual for them10 points above the other critics here. Usually 8 points above on The Flaming Lips's other albums (3).
- Rolling Stone About usual for them13 points below the other critics here. Usually 12 points below on The Flaming Lips's other albums (10).
More from The Flaming Lips
← Earlier With a Little Help from My Fwends (2014)Later → King’s Mouth (2019)
More Electronic from around 2017
Would you spin it again?
Be the first to answer. Results show once 3 listeners weigh in.
How the Breakdown works
Every outlet’s score is converted to 0–100 (2/5 is 40, 5.9/10 is 59, a B+ is 88) and averaged. Grades follow the B-Side scale: A is 90–100, B 80–89, C 70–79, D 60–69, F below 60. Approval is the share of critics who scored it 75 or higher; the Breakdown shows green at 75 and up, red below. Divisiveness asks a different question: not how many critics liked it, but how close their scores are to each other. Five critics who all give it 50 are Unanimous, even though none of them liked it. The labels run Unanimous, Broad agreement, Some debate, Divided, and Contentious. Replay rate comes from listeners, not critics: yes counts fully, a few tracks counts half, no counts zero. The gist quotes each outlet’s own summary of its review. Published is the date on the review itself, read from the outlet’s page, so you can see whether an album’s reputation came at release or years later. Scores marked est. come from reviews that publish no number. Scores marked via Wikipedia are archive ratings, mostly for older albums, taken from the “Professional ratings” box on the album’s Wikipedia page (published openly through Wikidata); each links to the original review when we can find it online, and to that Wikipedia entry when we can’t. When an outlet reviewed an album twice, years apart (often for a reissue), both scores count, each labeled with its year.
A-Side marks the critics’ top tier. An album earns it automatically, from its numbers alone: a Breakdown of 90 or higher, from at least 5 reviews, with at least 75% approval. Nobody hands it out and nobody can buy it; if new reviews pull an album below the line, it loses the badge.










Leave a Reply