Oczy Mlody

The Flaming Lips – Oczy Mlody: B-Side Breakdown 71 (C-) from 9 critic reviews.

Album cover for Oczy Mlody by The Flaming Lips
Released January 12, 2017
Shop on AmazonAs an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.
The Flaming Lips

Oczy Mlody

71
B-Side BreakdownGrade C- · 9 critics · 44% approval
B-Side Breakdown71Grade: C-
Approval44%4 of 9 critics scored it 75 or higher
DivisivenessSome debateHow close the scores are: most critics land within 22 points of each other

Critics give Oczy Mlody a B-Side Breakdown of 71 (C-), from 9 reviews at outlets we track. Scores run 60 to 90.

The verdict on Oczy Mlody

4 of 9 critics liked it. A mixed reception.

020406080100Rolling Stone: 60Mojo: 60NME: 60Pitchfork: 62AllMusic: 70The Independent: 80Clash: 80The Guardian: 80Slant: 90 Breakdown 71
The gist
Slant via Wikipediaby Jonathan Wroble 4.5/5 90 2017 “Oczy Mlody is a masterstroke of rhythm and tone that neither trips head-on into bliss nor spins into dismay.”
The Independent via Wikipediaby Andy Gill 4/5 80 2017 “Also Flo Morrissey & Matthew E White – Gentlewoman, Ruby Man, Rick Wakeman – Piano Portraits, and Aaron Lee Tasjan​ – Silver Tears”
Clash via Wikipediaby Joe Rivers 8/10 80 2017 “Wayne Coyne has described ‘Oczy Mlody’ as sounding “like Syd Barrett meets A$AP Rocky”. Given that conjures up thoughts of an”
The Guardian via Wikipediaby Dave Simpson 4/5 80 2017
AllMusic via Wikipediaby Heather Phares 3.5/5 70 2017
Pitchfork via Wikipediaby Stuart Berman 6.2/10 62 2017 “Miley Cyrus only appears once on the Flaming Lips’ claustrophobic new full-length, but the record wouldn’t sound the way it does without her presence in their lives.”
Rolling Stone via Wikipediaby Kory Grow 3/5 60 2017 “Our take on psych-rock veterans' 14th album.”
Mojo via Wikipedia 3/5 60 2016
NME via Wikipediaby Mark Beaumont 3/5 60 2017 “Future funk, psychedelic krautrock, goblin pop and, for real, loads more. The Flaming Lips new album is as weird as you hoped.”

Oczy Mlody in The Flaming Lips's catalog

75Hear It Is (1986): 50Oh My Gawd!!! (1987): 62Telepathic Surgery (1989): 60In a Priest Driven Ambulance (1990): 74Hit to Death in the Future Head (1992): 74Transmissions from the Satellite Heart (1993): 81Clouds Taste Metallic (1995): 72Zaireeka (1997): 69The Soft Bulletin (1999): 88Yoshimi Battles the Pink Robots (2002): 85At War with the Mystics (2006): 79Embryonic (2009): 76The Flaming Lips and Stardeath and White Dwarfs with Henry Rollins and Peaches Doing The Dark Side of the Moon (2009): 66The Flaming Lips and Heady Fwends (2012): 70The Terror (2013): 78With a Little Help from My Fwends (2014): 67Oczy Mlody (2017): 7171This oneKing’s Mouth (2019): 72American Head (2020): 8019862020
The Flaming Lips's albums by B-Side Breakdown, in release order. Above the dashed line, most critics liked it. Every The Flaming Lips album, ranked

How these critics usually treat The Flaming Lips

  • Slant Kinder than usual21 points above the other critics here. Usually 18 points below on The Flaming Lips's other albums (5).
  • NME Harsher than usual13 points below the other critics here. Usually 6 points above on The Flaming Lips's other albums (12).
  • The Guardian Kinder than usual10 points above the other critics here. Usually 3 points below on The Flaming Lips's other albums (6).
  • AllMusic About usual for them2 points below the other critics here. Usually 4 points above on The Flaming Lips's other albums (17).
  • The Independent About usual for them10 points above the other critics here. Usually 8 points above on The Flaming Lips's other albums (3).
  • Rolling Stone About usual for them13 points below the other critics here. Usually 12 points below on The Flaming Lips's other albums (10).

More from The Flaming Lips

See all The Flaming Lips albums ranked

More Electronic from around 2017

Would you spin it again?

Be the first to answer. Results show once 3 listeners weigh in.

How the Breakdown works

Every outlet’s score is converted to 0–100 (2/5 is 40, 5.9/10 is 59, a B+ is 88) and averaged. Grades follow the B-Side scale: A is 90–100, B 80–89, C 70–79, D 60–69, F below 60. Approval is the share of critics who scored it 75 or higher; the Breakdown shows green at 75 and up, red below. Divisiveness asks a different question: not how many critics liked it, but how close their scores are to each other. Five critics who all give it 50 are Unanimous, even though none of them liked it. The labels run Unanimous, Broad agreement, Some debate, Divided, and Contentious. Replay rate comes from listeners, not critics: yes counts fully, a few tracks counts half, no counts zero. The gist quotes each outlet’s own summary of its review. Published is the date on the review itself, read from the outlet’s page, so you can see whether an album’s reputation came at release or years later. Scores marked est. come from reviews that publish no number. Scores marked via Wikipedia are archive ratings, mostly for older albums, taken from the “Professional ratings” box on the album’s Wikipedia page (published openly through Wikidata); each links to the original review when we can find it online, and to that Wikipedia entry when we can’t. When an outlet reviewed an album twice, years apart (often for a reissue), both scores count, each labeled with its year.

A-Side marks the critics’ top tier. An album earns it automatically, from its numbers alone: a Breakdown of 90 or higher, from at least 5 reviews, with at least 75% approval. Nobody hands it out and nobody can buy it; if new reviews pull an album below the line, it loses the badge.

Report a problem


Discover more from B-Side Guys

Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.

Tags:

Leave a Reply