King’s Mouth

The Flaming Lips – King’s Mouth: B-Side Breakdown 72 (C-) from 10 critic reviews.

Album cover for King’s Mouth by The Flaming Lips
Released April 13, 2019
Shop on AmazonAs an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.
The Flaming Lips

King’s Mouth

72
B-Side BreakdownGrade C- · 10 critics · 50% approval
B-Side Breakdown72Grade: C-
Approval50%5 of 10 critics scored it 75 or higher
DivisivenessSome debateHow close the scores are: most critics land within 20 points of each other

Critics give King’s Mouth a B-Side Breakdown of 72 (C-), from 10 reviews at outlets we track. Scores run 50 to 81.

The verdict on King’s Mouth

5 of 10 critics liked it. A mixed reception.

020406080100Rolling Stone: 50Slant: 60Pitchfork: 70Exclaim!: 70AllMusic: 70PopMatters: 80Mojo: 80NME: 80The Guardian: 80Consequence: 81 Breakdown 72
The gist
Consequence via Wikipediaby Matt Melis B- 81 2019 “Wayne Coyne and his Flaming Lips return with a gentler collection of music, filled with bright melodies and heartfelt lyrics.”
PopMatters via Wikipediaby Chris Ingalls 8/10 80 2019 “It says a lot about the general weirdness of the Flaming Lips that when they make a concept album featuring narration by Mick Jones of the Clash, it barely”
Mojo via Wikipedia 4/5 80 2019
NME via Wikipediaby Mark Beaumont 4/5 80 2019 “On album 15, the band more playful, melodic, cinematic and cohesive than they have since ‘Yoshimi Battles The Pink Robots”
The Guardian via Wikipediaby Alexis Petridis 4/5 80 2019 “After a long spell of indulging in 24-hour jams and Stone Roses covers, Wayne Coyne’s band marshal their psychedelic powers for lush, honed songs”
Pitchfork via Wikipediaby Stuart Berman 7.0/10 70 2019 “As far as concept albums about magical, abnormally sized severed heads go, this is a pretty breezy listen.”
Exclaim! via Wikipediaby Owen Torrey 7/10 70 2019 “King's Mouth: Music and Songs”
AllMusic via Wikipediaby Heather Phares 3.5/5 70 2019
Slant via Wikipediaby Jeremy Winograd 3/5 60 2019 “The album’s heartwarming melodies set to hit-and-miss lyrics represents at least a partial return to form.”
Rolling Stone via Wikipediaby Jonathan Bernstein 2.5/5 50 2019 “Flaming Lips feel weighed down on their 15th album, 'King's Mouth,' by its high-concept ambition.”

King’s Mouth in The Flaming Lips's catalog

75Hear It Is (1986): 50Oh My Gawd!!! (1987): 62Telepathic Surgery (1989): 60In a Priest Driven Ambulance (1990): 74Hit to Death in the Future Head (1992): 74Transmissions from the Satellite Heart (1993): 81Clouds Taste Metallic (1995): 72Zaireeka (1997): 69The Soft Bulletin (1999): 88Yoshimi Battles the Pink Robots (2002): 85At War with the Mystics (2006): 79Embryonic (2009): 76The Flaming Lips and Stardeath and White Dwarfs with Henry Rollins and Peaches Doing The Dark Side of the Moon (2009): 66The Flaming Lips and Heady Fwends (2012): 70The Terror (2013): 78With a Little Help from My Fwends (2014): 67Oczy Mlody (2017): 71King’s Mouth (2019): 7272This oneAmerican Head (2020): 8019862020
The Flaming Lips's albums by B-Side Breakdown, in release order. Above the dashed line, most critics liked it. Every The Flaming Lips album, ranked

How these critics usually treat The Flaming Lips

  • Rolling Stone Harsher than usual25 points below the other critics here. Usually 11 points below on The Flaming Lips's other albums (10).
  • PopMatters Kinder than usual9 points above the other critics here. Usually 5 points below on The Flaming Lips's other albums (3).
  • The Guardian Kinder than usual9 points above the other critics here. Usually 3 points below on The Flaming Lips's other albums (6).
  • Pitchfork Kinder than usual2 points below the other critics here. Usually 11 points below on The Flaming Lips's other albums (10).
  • AllMusic About usual for them2 points below the other critics here. Usually 4 points above on The Flaming Lips's other albums (17).
  • NME About usual for them9 points above the other critics here. Usually 4 points above on The Flaming Lips's other albums (12).

More from The Flaming Lips

See all The Flaming Lips albums ranked

More Indie & Alternative from around 2019

Would you spin it again?

Be the first to answer. Results show once 3 listeners weigh in.

How the Breakdown works

Every outlet’s score is converted to 0–100 (2/5 is 40, 5.9/10 is 59, a B+ is 88) and averaged. Grades follow the B-Side scale: A is 90–100, B 80–89, C 70–79, D 60–69, F below 60. Approval is the share of critics who scored it 75 or higher; the Breakdown shows green at 75 and up, red below. Divisiveness asks a different question: not how many critics liked it, but how close their scores are to each other. Five critics who all give it 50 are Unanimous, even though none of them liked it. The labels run Unanimous, Broad agreement, Some debate, Divided, and Contentious. Replay rate comes from listeners, not critics: yes counts fully, a few tracks counts half, no counts zero. The gist quotes each outlet’s own summary of its review. Published is the date on the review itself, read from the outlet’s page, so you can see whether an album’s reputation came at release or years later. Scores marked est. come from reviews that publish no number. Scores marked via Wikipedia are archive ratings, mostly for older albums, taken from the “Professional ratings” box on the album’s Wikipedia page (published openly through Wikidata); each links to the original review when we can find it online, and to that Wikipedia entry when we can’t. When an outlet reviewed an album twice, years apart (often for a reissue), both scores count, each labeled with its year.

A-Side marks the critics’ top tier. An album earns it automatically, from its numbers alone: a Breakdown of 90 or higher, from at least 5 reviews, with at least 75% approval. Nobody hands it out and nobody can buy it; if new reviews pull an album below the line, it loses the badge.

Report a problem


Discover more from B-Side Guys

Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.

Tags:

Leave a Reply