Critics give King’s Mouth a B-Side Breakdown of 72 (C-), from 10 reviews at outlets we track. Scores run 50 to 81.
The verdict on King’s Mouth
5 of 10 critics liked it. A mixed reception.
- Highest 81 Consequence
- Lowest 50 Rolling Stone
- Career Tied for #10 of The Flaming Lips's 19 albums with a Breakdown
| The gist | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Consequence via Wikipediaby Matt Melis | B- | 81 | 2019 | “Wayne Coyne and his Flaming Lips return with a gentler collection of music, filled with bright melodies and heartfelt lyrics.” |
| PopMatters via Wikipediaby Chris Ingalls | 8/10 | 80 | 2019 | “It says a lot about the general weirdness of the Flaming Lips that when they make a concept album featuring narration by Mick Jones of the Clash, it barely” |
| Mojo via Wikipedia | 4/5 | 80 | 2019 | |
| NME via Wikipediaby Mark Beaumont | 4/5 | 80 | 2019 | “On album 15, the band more playful, melodic, cinematic and cohesive than they have since ‘Yoshimi Battles The Pink Robots” |
| The Guardian via Wikipediaby Alexis Petridis | 4/5 | 80 | 2019 | “After a long spell of indulging in 24-hour jams and Stone Roses covers, Wayne Coyne’s band marshal their psychedelic powers for lush, honed songs” |
| Pitchfork via Wikipediaby Stuart Berman | 7.0/10 | 70 | 2019 | “As far as concept albums about magical, abnormally sized severed heads go, this is a pretty breezy listen.” |
| Exclaim! via Wikipediaby Owen Torrey | 7/10 | 70 | 2019 | “King's Mouth: Music and Songs” |
| AllMusic via Wikipediaby Heather Phares | 3.5/5 | 70 | 2019 | |
| Slant via Wikipediaby Jeremy Winograd | 3/5 | 60 | 2019 | “The album’s heartwarming melodies set to hit-and-miss lyrics represents at least a partial return to form.” |
| Rolling Stone via Wikipediaby Jonathan Bernstein | 2.5/5 | 50 | 2019 | “Flaming Lips feel weighed down on their 15th album, 'King's Mouth,' by its high-concept ambition.” |
Every Sunday: the week's new albums, scored by the critics. Plus our own reviews when we post them. Free, and one click to leave.
King’s Mouth in The Flaming Lips's catalog
How these critics usually treat The Flaming Lips
- Rolling Stone Harsher than usual25 points below the other critics here. Usually 11 points below on The Flaming Lips's other albums (10).
- PopMatters Kinder than usual9 points above the other critics here. Usually 5 points below on The Flaming Lips's other albums (3).
- The Guardian Kinder than usual9 points above the other critics here. Usually 3 points below on The Flaming Lips's other albums (6).
- Pitchfork Kinder than usual2 points below the other critics here. Usually 11 points below on The Flaming Lips's other albums (10).
- AllMusic About usual for them2 points below the other critics here. Usually 4 points above on The Flaming Lips's other albums (17).
- NME About usual for them9 points above the other critics here. Usually 4 points above on The Flaming Lips's other albums (12).
More from The Flaming Lips
More Indie & Alternative from around 2019
Would you spin it again?
Be the first to answer. Results show once 3 listeners weigh in.
How the Breakdown works
Every outlet’s score is converted to 0–100 (2/5 is 40, 5.9/10 is 59, a B+ is 88) and averaged. Grades follow the B-Side scale: A is 90–100, B 80–89, C 70–79, D 60–69, F below 60. Approval is the share of critics who scored it 75 or higher; the Breakdown shows green at 75 and up, red below. Divisiveness asks a different question: not how many critics liked it, but how close their scores are to each other. Five critics who all give it 50 are Unanimous, even though none of them liked it. The labels run Unanimous, Broad agreement, Some debate, Divided, and Contentious. Replay rate comes from listeners, not critics: yes counts fully, a few tracks counts half, no counts zero. The gist quotes each outlet’s own summary of its review. Published is the date on the review itself, read from the outlet’s page, so you can see whether an album’s reputation came at release or years later. Scores marked est. come from reviews that publish no number. Scores marked via Wikipedia are archive ratings, mostly for older albums, taken from the “Professional ratings” box on the album’s Wikipedia page (published openly through Wikidata); each links to the original review when we can find it online, and to that Wikipedia entry when we can’t. When an outlet reviewed an album twice, years apart (often for a reissue), both scores count, each labeled with its year.
A-Side marks the critics’ top tier. An album earns it automatically, from its numbers alone: a Breakdown of 90 or higher, from at least 5 reviews, with at least 75% approval. Nobody hands it out and nobody can buy it; if new reviews pull an album below the line, it loses the badge.










Leave a Reply