Early reviews. Critics give Transmissions from the Satellite Heart an early B-Side Breakdown of 81 (B-), from 7 reviews so far. It will settle as more outlets weigh in.
The verdict on Transmissions from the Satellite Heart
5 of 7 critics liked it. A mixed reception.
- Highest 100 Chicago Tribune
- Lowest 60 Encyclopedia of Popular Music
- Career #3 of The Flaming Lips's 19 albums with a Breakdown
| The gist | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Chicago Tribune via Wikipediaby Greg Kot | 4/4 | 100 | 2004 | |
| The Rolling Stone Album Guide via Wikipediaby Greg Kot | 4.5/5 | 90 | 2004 | “Previously published as: Rolling Stone album guide” |
| AllMusic via Wikipediaby Jason Ankeny | 4.5/5 | 90 | ||
| Select via Wikipediaby Andrew Perry | 4/5 | 80 | 2004 | |
| Rolling Stone via Wikipediaby Greg Kot | 4/5 | 80 | 1993 | “Check out our album review of Artist's Transmissions From The Satellite Heart on Rolling Stone.com.” |
| NME via Wikipedia | 7/10 | 70 | 2004 | |
| Encyclopedia of Popular Music via Wikipediaby Colin Larkin | 3/5 | 60 | 2004 |
Every Sunday: the week's new albums, scored by the critics. Plus our own reviews when we post them. Free, and one click to leave.
Transmissions from the Satellite Heart in The Flaming Lips's catalog
How these critics usually treat The Flaming Lips
- NME Harsher than usual13 points below the other critics here. Usually 6 points above on The Flaming Lips's other albums (12).
- Encyclopedia of Popular Music Harsher than usual25 points below the other critics here. Usually 11 points below on The Flaming Lips's other albums (6).
- The Rolling Stone Album Guide Kinder than usual10 points above the other critics here. Usually 2 points below on The Flaming Lips's other albums (9).
- Rolling Stone Kinder than usual2 points below the other critics here. Usually 13 points below on The Flaming Lips's other albums (10).
- AllMusic About usual for them10 points above the other critics here. Usually 3 points above on The Flaming Lips's other albums (17).
More from The Flaming Lips
← Earlier Hit to Death in the Future Head (1992)Later → Clouds Taste Metallic (1995)
More Indie & Alternative from around 1993
Would you spin it again?
Be the first to answer. Results show once 3 listeners weigh in.
How the Breakdown works
Every outlet’s score is converted to 0–100 (2/5 is 40, 5.9/10 is 59, a B+ is 88) and averaged. Grades follow the B-Side scale: A is 90–100, B 80–89, C 70–79, D 60–69, F below 60. Approval is the share of critics who scored it 75 or higher; the Breakdown shows green at 75 and up, red below. Divisiveness asks a different question: not how many critics liked it, but how close their scores are to each other. Five critics who all give it 50 are Unanimous, even though none of them liked it. The labels run Unanimous, Broad agreement, Some debate, Divided, and Contentious. Replay rate comes from listeners, not critics: yes counts fully, a few tracks counts half, no counts zero. The gist quotes each outlet’s own summary of its review. Published is the date on the review itself, read from the outlet’s page, so you can see whether an album’s reputation came at release or years later. Scores marked est. come from reviews that publish no number. Scores marked via Wikipedia are archive ratings, mostly for older albums, taken from the “Professional ratings” box on the album’s Wikipedia page (published openly through Wikidata); each links to the original review when we can find it online, and to that Wikipedia entry when we can’t. When an outlet reviewed an album twice, years apart (often for a reissue), both scores count, each labeled with its year.
A-Side marks the critics’ top tier. An album earns it automatically, from its numbers alone: a Breakdown of 90 or higher, from at least 5 reviews, with at least 75% approval. Nobody hands it out and nobody can buy it; if new reviews pull an album below the line, it loses the badge.









Leave a Reply