Early reviews. Critics give The Flaming Lips and Heady Fwends an early B-Side Breakdown of 70 (C-), from 4 reviews so far. It will settle as more outlets weigh in.
The verdict on The Flaming Lips and Heady Fwends
So far, 1 of 4 critics liked it.
- Highest 78 Beats Per Minute
- Lowest 60 Record Collector
- Career #13 of The Flaming Lips's 19 albums with a Breakdown
| The gist | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beats Per Minuteby Craig Jenkins | 78% | 78 | 2012 | “Music News, Reviews, Interviews, Videos and MP3s” |
| The Line of Best Fit | 7/10 | 70 | 2012 | “The Flaming Lips team up with a bunch of famous buddies (Nick Cave, Bon Iver, Lightning Bolt etc.). Barely contained but undeniably charming chaos ensues.” |
| PopMattersby Evan Sawdey | 7/10 | 70 | 2012 | “I wouldn’t say we know a lot about music, but we know a lot about the way our audience listens to music, because they’re like us. So you know, when…” |
| Record Collectorby Sue Matiz | 3/5 | 60 | 2012 | “In March 2011, The Flaming Lips voiced a concern that’s been on a lot of minds recently: is David Bowie dying? Meditating on this with Neon Indian,” |
Every Sunday: the week's new albums, scored by the critics. Plus our own reviews when we post them. Free, and one click to leave.
The Flaming Lips and Heady Fwends in The Flaming Lips's catalog
How these critics usually treat The Flaming Lips
- PopMatters About usual for them1 point above the other critics here. Usually 2 points below on The Flaming Lips's other albums (3).
More from The Flaming Lips
← Earlier The Flaming Lips and Stardeath and White Dwarfs with Henry Rollins and Peaches Doing The Dark Side of the Moon (2009)Later → The Terror (2013)
More Rock from around 2012
Would you spin it again?
Be the first to answer. Results show once 3 listeners weigh in.
How the Breakdown works
Every outlet’s score is converted to 0–100 (2/5 is 40, 5.9/10 is 59, a B+ is 88) and averaged. Grades follow the B-Side scale: A is 90–100, B 80–89, C 70–79, D 60–69, F below 60. Approval is the share of critics who scored it 75 or higher; the Breakdown shows green at 75 and up, red below. Divisiveness asks a different question: not how many critics liked it, but how close their scores are to each other. Five critics who all give it 50 are Unanimous, even though none of them liked it. The labels run Unanimous, Broad agreement, Some debate, Divided, and Contentious. Replay rate comes from listeners, not critics: yes counts fully, a few tracks counts half, no counts zero. The gist quotes each outlet’s own summary of its review. Published is the date on the review itself, read from the outlet’s page, so you can see whether an album’s reputation came at release or years later. Scores marked est. come from reviews that publish no number. Scores marked via Wikipedia are archive ratings, mostly for older albums, taken from the “Professional ratings” box on the album’s Wikipedia page (published openly through Wikidata); each links to the original review when we can find it online, and to that Wikipedia entry when we can’t. When an outlet reviewed an album twice, years apart (often for a reissue), both scores count, each labeled with its year.
A-Side marks the critics’ top tier. An album earns it automatically, from its numbers alone: a Breakdown of 90 or higher, from at least 5 reviews, with at least 75% approval. Nobody hands it out and nobody can buy it; if new reviews pull an album below the line, it loses the badge.










Leave a Reply