Based on 9 reviews from outlets we track. Scores run 60 to 100.
By the numbers: The Flaming Lips's best-reviewed album here since Yoshimi Battles the Pink Robots (2002). Scores ran from 60 (Rolling Stone) to 100 (The Independent).
| The gist | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| The Independent via Wikipediaby Andy Gill | 5/5 | 100 | ||
| Los Angeles Times via Wikipediaby Steve Appleford | 3.5/4 | 88 | 2006 | “The Flaming Lips "At War With the Mystics" (Warner Bros.) * * * 1/2 THE Flaming Lips seem to enjoy their work, singing and shaking amid their balloons and bubbles…” |
| Entertainment Weekly via Wikipediaby Clark Collis | B | 85 | 2005 | |
| Q via Wikipedia | 4/5 | 80 | 2005 | |
| NME via Wikipediaby Pat Long | 8/10 | 80 | 2006 | “When you consider the fact that The Flaming Lips have been together since 1983, it’s remarkable how they consistently manage to outdo themselves. Just when you think the live shows…” |
| The Guardian via Wikipediaby Dorian Lynskey | 4/5 | 80 | 2006 | |
| AllMusic via Wikipediaby Heather Phares | 3.5/5 | 70 | ||
| Pitchfork via Wikipediaby Mark Richardson | 6.7/10 | 67 | 2006 | “Indie legends' first new album in four years– widely tipped to be the group's return to a more guitar-centric sound– is stylistically diverse and colored by distant, queasy prodcution.” |
| Rolling Stone via Wikipediaby Christian Hoard | 3/5 | 60 | 2006 | “Check out our album review of Artist's At War With The Mystics on Rolling Stone.com.” |
Every Sunday: the week's new albums, scored by the critics. Plus our own reviews when we post them. Free, and one click to leave.
More from The Flaming Lips
More Rock from around 2006
Would you spin it again?
Be the first to answer. Results show once 3 listeners weigh in.
How the Breakdown works
Every outlet’s score is converted to 0–100 (2/5 is 40, 5.9/10 is 59, a B+ is 88) and averaged. Grades follow the B-Side scale: A is 90–100, B 80–89, C 70–79, D 60–69, F below 60. Approval is the share of critics who scored it 75 or higher; the Breakdown shows green at 75 and up, red below. Divisiveness asks a different question: not how many critics liked it, but how close their scores are to each other. Five critics who all give it 50 are Unanimous, even though none of them liked it. The labels run Unanimous, Broad agreement, Some debate, Divided, and Contentious. Replay rate comes from listeners, not critics: yes counts fully, a few tracks counts half, no counts zero. The gist quotes each outlet’s own summary of its review. Published is the date on the review itself, read from the outlet’s page, so you can see whether an album’s reputation came at release or years later. Scores marked est. come from reviews that publish no number. Scores marked via Wikipedia are archive ratings, mostly for older albums, taken from the “Professional ratings” box on the album’s Wikipedia page (published openly through Wikidata); each links to the original review when we can find it online, and to that Wikipedia entry when we can’t. When an outlet reviewed an album twice, years apart (often for a reissue), both scores count, each labeled with its year.
A-Side marks the critics’ top tier. An album earns it automatically, from its numbers alone: a Breakdown of 90 or higher, from at least 5 reviews, with at least 75% approval. Nobody hands it out and nobody can buy it; if new reviews pull an album below the line, it loses the badge.








Leave a Reply