Critics give The Terror a B-Side Breakdown of 78 (C+), from 10 reviews at outlets we track. Scores run 50 to 91.
The verdict on The Terror
Most critics liked it: 9 of 10 liked it.
- Highest 91 The A.V. Club
- Outlier 50 Chicago Tribune, 25 points below the next-lowest score
- Career #6 of The Flaming Lips's 19 albums with a Breakdown
| The gist | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| The A.V. Club via Wikipediaby Simon Abrams | A- | 91 | 2022 | “The A.V. Club digs deep into film, TV, music, games, books and more.” |
| Spin via Wikipediaby Michael Tedder | 9/10 | 90 | 2013 | “9SPIN Rating: 9 of 10Release Date: April 16, 2013Label: Warner Bros. The Flaming Lips have never been shy about indulging themselves, but lately they've” |
| Rolling Stone via Wikipediaby David Fricke | 4/5 | 80 | 2013 | “Check out our album review of Artist's The Terror on Rolling Stone.com.” |
| The Independent via Wikipediaby Simon Price | 4/5 | 80 | 2013 | |
| NME via Wikipediaby Matthew Horton | 8/10 | 80 | 2013 | |
| The Guardian via Wikipediaby Dave Simpson | 4/5 | 80 | 2013 | “Wayne Coyne and friends return to their experimental roots – with knobs on, writes Dave Simpson” |
| AllMusic via Wikipediaby Heather Phares | 4/5 | 80 | ||
| Pitchfork via Wikipediaby Stuart Berman | 7.8/10 | 78 | 2013 | “The Flaming Lips' unrelenting new album retains Embryonic's weighty mood but deconstructs the instrumental bombast into skeletal, mechanical forms. Where its 2009 antecedent played on themes of environmental destruction, The…” |
| Entertainment Weekly via Wikipediaby Grady Smith | C | 75 | 2013 | |
| Chicago Tribune via Wikipediaby Greg Kot | 2/4 | 50 | 2013 |
Every Sunday: the week's new albums, scored by the critics. Plus our own reviews when we post them. Free, and one click to leave.
The Terror in The Flaming Lips's catalog
How these critics usually treat The Flaming Lips
- Entertainment Weekly Harsher than usual4 points below the other critics here. Usually 12 points above on The Flaming Lips's other albums (5).
- Rolling Stone Kinder than usual2 points above the other critics here. Usually 13 points below on The Flaming Lips's other albums (10).
- Spin Kinder than usual13 points above the other critics here. Usually 1 point above on The Flaming Lips's other albums (4).
- Pitchfork Kinder than usualLevel with the other critics here. Usually 11 points below on The Flaming Lips's other albums (10).
- The Independent Harsher than usual2 points above the other critics here. Usually 11 points above on The Flaming Lips's other albums (3).
- The Guardian About usual for them2 points above the other critics here. Usually 2 points below on The Flaming Lips's other albums (6).
More from The Flaming Lips
← Earlier The Flaming Lips and Heady Fwends (2012)Later → With a Little Help from My Fwends (2014)
More Electronic from around 2013
Would you spin it again?
Be the first to answer. Results show once 3 listeners weigh in.
How the Breakdown works
Every outlet’s score is converted to 0–100 (2/5 is 40, 5.9/10 is 59, a B+ is 88) and averaged. Grades follow the B-Side scale: A is 90–100, B 80–89, C 70–79, D 60–69, F below 60. Approval is the share of critics who scored it 75 or higher; the Breakdown shows green at 75 and up, red below. Divisiveness asks a different question: not how many critics liked it, but how close their scores are to each other. Five critics who all give it 50 are Unanimous, even though none of them liked it. The labels run Unanimous, Broad agreement, Some debate, Divided, and Contentious. Replay rate comes from listeners, not critics: yes counts fully, a few tracks counts half, no counts zero. The gist quotes each outlet’s own summary of its review. Published is the date on the review itself, read from the outlet’s page, so you can see whether an album’s reputation came at release or years later. Scores marked est. come from reviews that publish no number. Scores marked via Wikipedia are archive ratings, mostly for older albums, taken from the “Professional ratings” box on the album’s Wikipedia page (published openly through Wikidata); each links to the original review when we can find it online, and to that Wikipedia entry when we can’t. When an outlet reviewed an album twice, years apart (often for a reissue), both scores count, each labeled with its year.
A-Side marks the critics’ top tier. An album earns it automatically, from its numbers alone: a Breakdown of 90 or higher, from at least 5 reviews, with at least 75% approval. Nobody hands it out and nobody can buy it; if new reviews pull an album below the line, it loses the badge.









Leave a Reply