Skeletal Lamping

of Montreal – Skeletal Lamping: B-Side Breakdown 71 (Keeper) from 11 critic reviews.

Album cover for Skeletal Lamping by of Montreal
Released October 7, 2008
Shop on AmazonAs an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.
of Montreal

Skeletal Lamping

71
B-Side BreakdownKeeper · 11 critics · 55% approval
B-Side Breakdown71Keeper
Approval55%6 of 11 critics scored it 70 or higher
DivisivenessSome debateHow close the scores are: most critics land within 28 points of each other

Critics give Skeletal Lamping a B-Side Breakdown of 71 (Keeper), from 11 reviews at outlets we track. Scores run 50 to 90.

The verdict on Skeletal Lamping

6 of 11 critics liked it. A mixed reception.

020406080100AllMusic: 50Pitchfork: 59Tiny Mix Tapes: 60PopMatters: 60The A.V. Club: 65DIY: 70Rolling Stone: 70Slant: 80musicOMH: 90Blender: 90Drowned in Sound: 90 Breakdown 71
The gist
musicOMHby Sam Shepherd 4.5/5 90 2008 “You've plugged your new set top box in. Time to go channel surfing. There's a serial killer documentary, the Dave Channel (or the Clarkson channel as is”
Blender via Wikipediaby Rob Sheffield 4.5/5 90
Drowned in Sound via Wikipediaby Andrzej Lukowski 9/10 90 2008 “Skeletal Lamping is so psychotically overambitious, so ballsy, bewildering, beautiful, mad, terrifying, romantic, depraved, unwieldy, illogical and…”
Slantby Jonathan Keefe 4/5 80 2008 “On Skeletal Lamping, Kevin Barnes offers something of a treatise on modern sexual politics.”
DIYby Siân Rowe 3.5/5 70 2008
Rolling Stone via Wikipediaby Caryn Ganz 3.5/5 70 2008
The A.V. Club via Wikipediaby Chris Martins B 65 2008 “Of Montreal: Skeletal Lamping”
Tiny Mix Tapes via Wikipediaby Brendan Phillips 3/5 60 “For a band whose sound approaches uncontained glee, the mood created by Hissing Fauna, Are You the Destroyer?, of Montreal's 2007 masterpiece is similar to, say, standing inside of a…”
PopMatters via Wikipediaby Evan Sawdey 6/10 60 2008 “Last year was pretty much the coming out party for Kevin Barnes, as exuberant an indie musician as there is, finally getting his due. In January of that year,”
Pitchfork via Wikipediaby Adam Moerder 5.9/10 59 2008 “Despite Kevin Barnes' role-playing– he again here inhabits the figurative skin of alter ego Georgie Fruit– the story on this album is its relentlessly schizophrenic composition, with nearly an hour…”
AllMusic via Wikipedia 2.5/5 50 2007

Skeletal Lamping in of Montreal's catalog

70Aldhils Arboretum (2002): 7474Satanic Panic in the Attic (2004): 7878The Sunlandic Twins (2005): 7272Hissing Fauna, Are You the Destroyer? (2007): 7474Skeletal Lamping (2008): 7171This oneFalse Priest (2010): 7272Paralytic Stalks (2012): 7070Lousy with Sylvianbriar (2013): 7878Aureate Gloom (2015): 656520022015
of Montreal's albums by B-Side Breakdown, in release order. Above the dashed line, most critics liked it. Every of Montreal album, ranked

How these critics usually treat of Montreal

  • AllMusic Harsher than usual23 points below the other critics here. Usually 10 points above on of Montreal's other albums (8).
  • Pitchfork Harsher than usual14 points below the other critics here. Usually 5 points below on of Montreal's other albums (8).
  • Rolling Stone About usual for them1 point below the other critics here. Usually 8 points below on of Montreal's other albums (6).
  • The A.V. Club About usual for them7 points below the other critics here. Usually 8 points below on of Montreal's other albums (4).

More from of Montreal

See all of Montreal albums ranked

More Indie & Alternative from around 2008

Would you spin it again?

Be the first to answer. Results show once 3 listeners weigh in.

How the Breakdown works

Every outlet’s score is converted to 0–100 (2/5 is 40, 5.9/10 is 59) and averaged. A letter grade counts as the star rating it matches across thousands of reviews of the same albums, so a B+ is 75, like four stars, and a B is 65. Verdicts: Heavy Rotation is 85 and up, Keeper 70–84, Mixed Bag 55–69, Back of the Crate below 55. Approval is the share of critics who scored it 70 or higher (7/10, three and a half stars); the Breakdown shows green at 70 and up, red below. Divisiveness asks a different question: not how many critics liked it, but how close their scores are to each other. Five critics who all give it 50 are Unanimous, even though none of them liked it. The labels run Unanimous, Broad agreement, Some debate, Divided, and Contentious. Replay rate comes from listeners, not critics: yes counts fully, a few tracks counts half, no counts zero. The gist quotes each outlet’s own summary of its review. Published is the date on the review itself, read from the outlet’s page, so you can see whether an album’s reputation came at release or years later. Scores marked est. come from reviews that publish no number. Scores marked via Wikipedia are archive ratings, mostly for older albums, taken from the “Professional ratings” box on the album’s Wikipedia page (published openly through Wikidata); each links to the original review when we can find it online, and to that Wikipedia entry when we can’t. When an outlet reviewed an album twice, years apart (often for a reissue), both scores count, each labeled with its year.

A-Side marks the critics’ top tier. An album earns it automatically, from its numbers alone: a Breakdown of 90 or higher, from at least 5 reviews, with at least 75% approval. Nobody hands it out and nobody can buy it; if new reviews pull an album below the line, it loses the badge.

Report a problem


Discover more from B-Side Guys

Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.

Tags:

Leave a Reply