False Priest

of Montreal – False Priest: B-Side Breakdown 77 (C+) from 5 critic reviews.

Album cover for False Priest by of Montreal
Released September 13, 2010
Shop on AmazonAs an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.
of Montreal

False Priest

77
B-Side BreakdownGrade C+ · 5 critics · 60% approval
B-Side Breakdown77Grade: C+
Approval60%3 of 5 critics scored it 75 or higher
DivisivenessBroad agreementHow close the scores are: most critics land within 16 points of each other

Early reviews. Critics give False Priest an early B-Side Breakdown of 77 (C+), from 5 reviews so far. It will settle as more outlets weigh in.

The verdict on False Priest

3 of 5 critics liked it. A mixed reception.

020406080100Pitchfork: 67Rolling Stone: 70Consequence: 78AllMusic: 80Spin: 90 Breakdown 77
The gist
Spin via Wikipediaby Barry Walters 9/10 90 2010 “9SPIN Rating: 9 of 10Release Date: September 14, 2010Label: PolyvinylKevin Barnes, the madman/genius/spaz behind Of Montreal, might have the craziest”
AllMusic via Wikipediaby Tim Sendra 4/5 80 2009
Consequence via Wikipediaby Philip Cosores C+ 78 2010 “Is it weird that the flaws make Of Montreal a better and more interesting band?”
Rolling Stone via Wikipediaby Jon Dolan 3.5/5 70 2010
Pitchfork via Wikipediaby Rob Mitchum 6.7/10 67 2010 “Kevin Barnes delivers more ambitious psych-pop in the vein of Hissing Fauna or Skeletal Lamping, here with help from Jon Brion and Janelle Monáe.”

More from of Montreal

See all of Montreal albums ranked

More Indie & Alternative from around 2010

Would you spin it again?

Be the first to answer. Results show once 3 listeners weigh in.

How the Breakdown works

Every outlet’s score is converted to 0–100 (2/5 is 40, 5.9/10 is 59, a B+ is 88) and averaged. Grades follow the B-Side scale: A is 90–100, B 80–89, C 70–79, D 60–69, F below 60. Approval is the share of critics who scored it 75 or higher; the Breakdown shows green at 75 and up, red below. Divisiveness asks a different question: not how many critics liked it, but how close their scores are to each other. Five critics who all give it 50 are Unanimous, even though none of them liked it. The labels run Unanimous, Broad agreement, Some debate, Divided, and Contentious. Replay rate comes from listeners, not critics: yes counts fully, a few tracks counts half, no counts zero. The gist quotes each outlet’s own summary of its review. Published is the date on the review itself, read from the outlet’s page, so you can see whether an album’s reputation came at release or years later. Scores marked est. come from reviews that publish no number. Scores marked via Wikipedia are archive ratings, mostly for older albums, taken from the “Professional ratings” box on the album’s Wikipedia page (published openly through Wikidata); each links to the original review when we can find it online, and to that Wikipedia entry when we can’t. When an outlet reviewed an album twice, years apart (often for a reissue), both scores count, each labeled with its year.

A-Side marks the critics’ top tier. An album earns it automatically, from its numbers alone: a Breakdown of 90 or higher, from at least 5 reviews, with at least 75% approval. Nobody hands it out and nobody can buy it; if new reviews pull an album below the line, it loses the badge.

Report a problem

Tags:

Leave a Reply