Critics give Aureate Gloom a B-Side Breakdown of 69 (D+), from 10 reviews at outlets we track. Scores run 50 to 81.
The verdict on Aureate Gloom
5 of 10 critics liked it. A mixed reception.
- Highest 81 The A.V. Club
- Lowest 50 PopMatters
- By the numbers The lowest score of of Montreal's 9 albums with a Breakdown.
| The gist | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| The A.V. Club via Wikipediaby Erik Adams | B- | 81 | 2022 | “The A.V. Club digs deep into film, TV, music, games, books and more.” |
| Exclaim! via Wikipediaby Mackenzie Herd | 8/10 | 80 | 2015 | |
| DIY via Wikipediaby David Zammitt | 4/5 | 80 | 2015 | “It’s thirteenth time lucky with this Technicolor epic.” |
| AllMusic via Wikipediaby Marcy Donelson | 4/5 | 80 | ||
| Consequence via Wikipediaby Dean Essner | C+ | 78 | 2015 | “To the Kevin Barnes completists out there, it's totally worth a listen.” |
| Pitchfork via Wikipediaby Jeremy D. Larson | 7/10 | 70 | 2015 | “Of Montreal's 13th record, dealing with the fallout from Kevin Barnes' separation from his wife, is his most straightforward and least inscrutable release in some time.” |
| Rolling Stone via Wikipediaby Will Hermes | 3/5 | 60 | 2015 | “Check out our album review of Artist's Aureate Gloom on Rolling Stone.com.” |
| Drowned in Sound via Wikipediaby Russell Warfield | 6/10 | 60 | 2015 | “Aureate Gloom stretches spontaneity to the point of feeling rushed” |
| Sputnikmusic via Wikipediaby Rudy K | 2.6/5 | 52 | 2015 | “of Montreal – Aureate Gloom review: Conventionally unconventional.” |
| PopMatters via Wikipediaby Nathan Stevens | 5/10 | 50 | 2015 | “Kevin Barns is a madman; this is well documented. From Of Montreal’s obsessions over Dustin Hoffman in their early days (example track title: "Dustin Hoffman” |
Every Sunday: the week's new albums, scored by the critics. Plus our own reviews when we post them. Free, and one click to leave.
Aureate Gloom in of Montreal's catalog
How these critics usually treat of Montreal
- Pitchfork Kinder than usual1 point above the other critics here. Usually 10 points below on of Montreal's other albums (8).
- Consequence Kinder than usual10 points above the other critics here. Usually level with the others on of Montreal's other albums (3).
- AllMusic Kinder than usual12 points above the other critics here. Usually 2 points above on of Montreal's other albums (8).
- The A.V. Club About usual for them13 points above the other critics here. Usually 10 points above on of Montreal's other albums (4).
- Rolling Stone About usual for them10 points below the other critics here. Usually 10 points below on of Montreal's other albums (6).
More from of Montreal
More Indie & Alternative from around 2015
Would you spin it again?
Be the first to answer. Results show once 3 listeners weigh in.
How the Breakdown works
Every outlet’s score is converted to 0–100 (2/5 is 40, 5.9/10 is 59, a B+ is 88) and averaged. Grades follow the B-Side scale: A is 90–100, B 80–89, C 70–79, D 60–69, F below 60. Approval is the share of critics who scored it 75 or higher; the Breakdown shows green at 75 and up, red below. Divisiveness asks a different question: not how many critics liked it, but how close their scores are to each other. Five critics who all give it 50 are Unanimous, even though none of them liked it. The labels run Unanimous, Broad agreement, Some debate, Divided, and Contentious. Replay rate comes from listeners, not critics: yes counts fully, a few tracks counts half, no counts zero. The gist quotes each outlet’s own summary of its review. Published is the date on the review itself, read from the outlet’s page, so you can see whether an album’s reputation came at release or years later. Scores marked est. come from reviews that publish no number. Scores marked via Wikipedia are archive ratings, mostly for older albums, taken from the “Professional ratings” box on the album’s Wikipedia page (published openly through Wikidata); each links to the original review when we can find it online, and to that Wikipedia entry when we can’t. When an outlet reviewed an album twice, years apart (often for a reissue), both scores count, each labeled with its year.
A-Side marks the critics’ top tier. An album earns it automatically, from its numbers alone: a Breakdown of 90 or higher, from at least 5 reviews, with at least 75% approval. Nobody hands it out and nobody can buy it; if new reviews pull an album below the line, it loses the badge.










Leave a Reply