Critics give The Sunlandic Twins a B-Side Breakdown of 75 (C), from 9 reviews at outlets we track. Scores run 60 to 91.
The verdict on The Sunlandic Twins
6 of 9 critics liked it. A mixed reception.
- Highest 91 Stylus Magazine
- Lowest 60 Q and Mojo
- Career #5 of of Montreal's 9 albums with a Breakdown
| The gist | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Stylus Magazine via Wikipediaby Kyle McConaghy | A- | 91 | 2005 | |
| Entertainment Weekly via Wikipediaby Steven Chen | B- | 81 | 2005 | |
| NME via Wikipedia | 8/10 | 80 | 2005 | |
| The Independent via Wikipediaby Andy Gill | 4/5 | 80 | 2005 | |
| Alternative Press via Wikipedia | 4/5 | 80 | 2005 | |
| AllMusic via Wikipediaby Dave Thompson | 4/5 | 80 | ||
| Pitchfork via Wikipediaby Sam Ubl | 6.4/10 | 64 | 2005 | “Kevin Barnes and co. follow the excellent Satanic Panic in the Attic with a self-described “foray into 21st century A.D.D. electro cinematic avant-disco” |
| Q via Wikipedia | 3/5 | 60 | 2005 | |
| Mojo via Wikipedia | 3/5 | 60 | 2005 |
Every Sunday: the week's new albums, scored by the critics. Plus our own reviews when we post them. Free, and one click to leave.
The Sunlandic Twins in of Montreal's catalog
How these critics usually treat of Montreal
- Pitchfork About usual for them13 points below the other critics here. Usually 8 points below on of Montreal's other albums (8).
- AllMusic About usual for them6 points above the other critics here. Usually 3 points above on of Montreal's other albums (8).
More from of Montreal
← Earlier Satanic Panic in the Attic (2004)Later → Hissing Fauna, Are You the Destroyer? (2007)
More Indie & Alternative from around 2005
Would you spin it again?
Be the first to answer. Results show once 3 listeners weigh in.
How the Breakdown works
Every outlet’s score is converted to 0–100 (2/5 is 40, 5.9/10 is 59, a B+ is 88) and averaged. Grades follow the B-Side scale: A is 90–100, B 80–89, C 70–79, D 60–69, F below 60. Approval is the share of critics who scored it 75 or higher; the Breakdown shows green at 75 and up, red below. Divisiveness asks a different question: not how many critics liked it, but how close their scores are to each other. Five critics who all give it 50 are Unanimous, even though none of them liked it. The labels run Unanimous, Broad agreement, Some debate, Divided, and Contentious. Replay rate comes from listeners, not critics: yes counts fully, a few tracks counts half, no counts zero. The gist quotes each outlet’s own summary of its review. Published is the date on the review itself, read from the outlet’s page, so you can see whether an album’s reputation came at release or years later. Scores marked est. come from reviews that publish no number. Scores marked via Wikipedia are archive ratings, mostly for older albums, taken from the “Professional ratings” box on the album’s Wikipedia page (published openly through Wikidata); each links to the original review when we can find it online, and to that Wikipedia entry when we can’t. When an outlet reviewed an album twice, years apart (often for a reissue), both scores count, each labeled with its year.
A-Side marks the critics’ top tier. An album earns it automatically, from its numbers alone: a Breakdown of 90 or higher, from at least 5 reviews, with at least 75% approval. Nobody hands it out and nobody can buy it; if new reviews pull an album below the line, it loses the badge.










Leave a Reply