Paralytic Stalks

of Montreal – Paralytic Stalks: B-Side Breakdown 70 (Keeper) from 10 critic reviews.

Album cover for Paralytic Stalks by of Montreal
Released February 7, 2012
Shop on AmazonAs an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.
of Montreal

Paralytic Stalks

70
B-Side BreakdownKeeper · 10 critics · 80% approval
B-Side Breakdown70Keeper
Approval80%8 of 10 critics scored it 70 or higher
DivisivenessSome debateHow close the scores are: most critics land within 22 points of each other

Critics give Paralytic Stalks a B-Side Breakdown of 70 (Keeper), from 10 reviews at outlets we track. Scores run 46 to 90.

The verdict on Paralytic Stalks

8 of 10 critics liked it, with some disagreement on how much.

020406080100Pitchfork: 46Rolling Stone: 60Sputnikmusic: 70Consequence: 70Drowned in Sound: 70AllMusic: 70Paste: 72The A.V. Club: 75Under the Radar: 80Tiny Mix Tapes: 90 Breakdown 70
The gist
Tiny Mix Tapes via Wikipedia 4.5/5 90
Under the Radar via Wikipediaby Ryan Reed 8/10 80 “On dance-prog epic "Ye, Renew the Plaintiff," of Montreal freak-genius Kevin Barnes nearly screams himself hoarse: "I'm desperate for something, but there's no human word for it/I should be happy,…”
The A.V. Club via Wikipedia B+ 75
Paste via Wikipediaby James Greer 7.2/10 72 2012 “Paste Magazine is your source for the best music, movies, TV, comedy, videogames, books, comics, craft beer, politics and more. Discover your favorite albums and films.”
Sputnikmusic via Wikipediaby Rudy K 3.5/5 70 2012 “of Montreal – Paralytic Stalks review: "Once more I turn to my crotch for counsel.”
Consequence via Wikipediaby Alex Young 3.5/5 70 2012 “Frontman Kevin Barnes finally breaks free of his own shadow.”
Drowned in Sound via Wikipedia 7/10 70 2012 “Despite its heart of darkness, Paralytic Stalks is a deceptively gentle, rambling record that gains integrity but loses focus vis the listener's st…”
AllMusic via Wikipedia 3.5/5 70
Rolling Stone via Wikipediaby Joe Levy 3/5 60 2012 “Check out our album review of Artist's Paralytic Stalks on Rolling Stone.com.”
Pitchfork via Wikipediaby Larry Fitzmaurice 4.6/10 46 2012 “This is, without a doubt, Kevin Barnes' most fragmented record since the tail end of the project's Elephant 6 days.”

Paralytic Stalks in of Montreal's catalog

70Aldhils Arboretum (2002): 7474Satanic Panic in the Attic (2004): 7878The Sunlandic Twins (2005): 7272Hissing Fauna, Are You the Destroyer? (2007): 7474Skeletal Lamping (2008): 7171False Priest (2010): 7272Paralytic Stalks (2012): 7070This oneLousy with Sylvianbriar (2013): 7878Aureate Gloom (2015): 656520022015
of Montreal's albums by B-Side Breakdown, in release order. Above the dashed line, most critics liked it. Every of Montreal album, ranked

How these critics usually treat of Montreal

  • Pitchfork Harsher than usual27 points below the other critics here. Usually 3 points below on of Montreal's other albums (8).
  • The A.V. Club Kinder than usual5 points above the other critics here. Usually 11 points below on of Montreal's other albums (4).
  • Consequence Kinder than usualLevel with the other critics here. Usually 10 points below on of Montreal's other albums (3).
  • AllMusic About usual for themLevel with the other critics here. Usually 7 points above on of Montreal's other albums (8).
  • Rolling Stone About usual for them11 points below the other critics here. Usually 6 points below on of Montreal's other albums (6).

More from of Montreal

See all of Montreal albums ranked

More Indie & Alternative from around 2012

Would you spin it again?

Be the first to answer. Results show once 3 listeners weigh in.

How the Breakdown works

Every outlet’s score is converted to 0–100 (2/5 is 40, 5.9/10 is 59) and averaged. A letter grade counts as the star rating it matches across thousands of reviews of the same albums, so a B+ is 75, like four stars, and a B is 65. Verdicts: Heavy Rotation is 85 and up, Keeper 70–84, Mixed Bag 55–69, Back of the Crate below 55. Approval is the share of critics who scored it 70 or higher (7/10, three and a half stars); the Breakdown shows green at 70 and up, red below. Divisiveness asks a different question: not how many critics liked it, but how close their scores are to each other. Five critics who all give it 50 are Unanimous, even though none of them liked it. The labels run Unanimous, Broad agreement, Some debate, Divided, and Contentious. Replay rate comes from listeners, not critics: yes counts fully, a few tracks counts half, no counts zero. The gist quotes each outlet’s own summary of its review. Published is the date on the review itself, read from the outlet’s page, so you can see whether an album’s reputation came at release or years later. Scores marked est. come from reviews that publish no number. Scores marked via Wikipedia are archive ratings, mostly for older albums, taken from the “Professional ratings” box on the album’s Wikipedia page (published openly through Wikidata); each links to the original review when we can find it online, and to that Wikipedia entry when we can’t. When an outlet reviewed an album twice, years apart (often for a reissue), both scores count, each labeled with its year.

A-Side marks the critics’ top tier. An album earns it automatically, from its numbers alone: a Breakdown of 90 or higher, from at least 5 reviews, with at least 75% approval. Nobody hands it out and nobody can buy it; if new reviews pull an album below the line, it loses the badge.

Report a problem


Discover more from B-Side Guys

Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.

Tags:

Leave a Reply