Hissing Fauna, Are You the Destroyer?

of Montreal – Hissing Fauna, Are You the Destroyer?: B-Side Breakdown 77 (C+) from 10 critic reviews.

Album cover for Hissing Fauna, Are You the Destroyer? by of Montreal
Released January 23, 2007
Shop on AmazonAs an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.
of Montreal

Hissing Fauna, Are You the Destroyer?

77
B-Side BreakdownGrade C+ · 10 critics · 60% approval
B-Side Breakdown77Grade: C+
Approval60%6 of 10 critics scored it 75 or higher
DivisivenessSome debateHow close the scores are: most critics land within 20 points of each other

Critics give Hissing Fauna, Are You the Destroyer? a B-Side Breakdown of 77 (C+), from 10 reviews at outlets we track. Scores run 60 to 88.

The verdict on Hissing Fauna, Are You the Destroyer?

6 of 10 critics liked it. A mixed reception.

020406080100Rolling Stone: 60The Guardian: 60Spin: 70NME: 70Q: 80AllMusic: 80The A.V. Club: 85Pitchfork: 87Los Angeles Times: 88Entertainment Weekly: 88 Breakdown 77
The gist
Los Angeles Times via Wikipediaby Ann Powers 3.5/4 88 2007 “Travel writer Pico Iyer once described jet lag as the sensation that your mind is "moving as with a phantom limb.”
Entertainment Weekly via Wikipediaby Leah Greenblatt B+ 88 2007
Pitchfork via Wikipediaby Rob Mitchum 8.7/10 87 2007 “Of Montreal's darkest and most experimental record to date, Hissing Fauna, Are You the Destroyer gorily chronicles frontman Kevin Barnes' recent relationship woes, all while rebuilding the band as a…”
The A.V. Club via Wikipediaby Saloni Gajjar B 85 2022 “The A.V. Club digs deep into film, TV, music, games, books and more.”
Q via Wikipedia 4/5 80 2006
AllMusic via Wikipediaby J. Scott McClintock 4/5 80
Spin via Wikipediaby Caryn Ganz 3.5/5 70 2007
NME via Wikipediaby Louis Pattison 7/10 70 2007 “As if trying to out-emo emo, it’s said Kevin Barnes formed indie-pop dandies Of Montreal after a failed love affair with a girl from Canada. But over the last decade,…”
Rolling Stone via Wikipediaby Christian Hoard 3/5 60 2007
The Guardian via Wikipediaby Maddy Costa 3/5 60 2007 “(PolyVinyl Records)”

Hissing Fauna, Are You the Destroyer? in of Montreal's catalog

75Aldhils Arboretum (2002): 7474Satanic Panic in the Attic (2004): 8080The Sunlandic Twins (2005): 7575Hissing Fauna, Are You the Destroyer? (2007): 7777This oneSkeletal Lamping (2008): 7373False Priest (2010): 7777Paralytic Stalks (2012): 7272Lousy with Sylvianbriar (2013): 8080Aureate Gloom (2015): 696920022015
of Montreal's albums by B-Side Breakdown, in release order. Above the dashed line, most critics liked it. Every of Montreal album, ranked

How these critics usually treat of Montreal

  • Pitchfork Kinder than usual11 points above the other critics here. Usually 11 points below on of Montreal's other albums (8).
  • Rolling Stone Harsher than usual19 points below the other critics here. Usually 8 points below on of Montreal's other albums (6).
  • The A.V. Club About usual for them9 points above the other critics here. Usually 11 points above on of Montreal's other albums (4).
  • AllMusic About usual for them4 points above the other critics here. Usually 3 points above on of Montreal's other albums (8).

More from of Montreal

See all of Montreal albums ranked

More Indie & Alternative from around 2007

Would you spin it again?

Be the first to answer. Results show once 3 listeners weigh in.

How the Breakdown works

Every outlet’s score is converted to 0–100 (2/5 is 40, 5.9/10 is 59, a B+ is 88) and averaged. Grades follow the B-Side scale: A is 90–100, B 80–89, C 70–79, D 60–69, F below 60. Approval is the share of critics who scored it 75 or higher; the Breakdown shows green at 75 and up, red below. Divisiveness asks a different question: not how many critics liked it, but how close their scores are to each other. Five critics who all give it 50 are Unanimous, even though none of them liked it. The labels run Unanimous, Broad agreement, Some debate, Divided, and Contentious. Replay rate comes from listeners, not critics: yes counts fully, a few tracks counts half, no counts zero. The gist quotes each outlet’s own summary of its review. Published is the date on the review itself, read from the outlet’s page, so you can see whether an album’s reputation came at release or years later. Scores marked est. come from reviews that publish no number. Scores marked via Wikipedia are archive ratings, mostly for older albums, taken from the “Professional ratings” box on the album’s Wikipedia page (published openly through Wikidata); each links to the original review when we can find it online, and to that Wikipedia entry when we can’t. When an outlet reviewed an album twice, years apart (often for a reissue), both scores count, each labeled with its year.

A-Side marks the critics’ top tier. An album earns it automatically, from its numbers alone: a Breakdown of 90 or higher, from at least 5 reviews, with at least 75% approval. Nobody hands it out and nobody can buy it; if new reviews pull an album below the line, it loses the badge.

Report a problem


Discover more from B-Side Guys

Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.

Tags:

Leave a Reply