Critics give Sharon Van Etten & the Attachment Theory a B-Side Breakdown of 82 (B-), from 10 reviews at outlets we track. Scores run 70 to 100.
The verdict on Sharon Van Etten & the Attachment Theory
8 of 10 critics liked it, with some disagreement on how much.
- Highest 100 The Independent and DIY
- Lowest 70 The Line of Best Fit and AllMusic
- Career #3 of Sharon Van Etten's 6 albums with a Breakdown
- By the numbers Sharon Van Etten's best-reviewed album here since Remind Me Tomorrow (2019).
| The gist | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| The Independent via Wikipediaby Helen Brown | 5/5 | 100 | 2025 | “Sensitively produced by Marta Salogni, the result is both seductive and hypnotic – it’s as though Van Etten has taken a creative stage dive and found herself held aloft by…” |
| DIY via Wikipediaby Joe Goggins | 5/5 | 100 | 2025 | “Songs which are anthemic in feel and universal in their lyricism.” |
| Under the Radar via Wikipediaby Kyle Mullin | 8.5/10 | 85 | ||
| PopMatters via Wikipediaby Patrick Gill | 8/10 | 80 | 2025 | “Sharon Van Etten & The Attachment Theory incorporate synths and darker sonic textures that suit the singer's cerebral thoughts and powerhouse vocals.” |
| Rolling Stone via Wikipediaby Rob Sheffield | 4/5 | 80 | 2025 | “Sharon Van Etten's 'Sharon Van Etten and the Attachment Theory' Review” |
| Paste via Wikipediaby Ellen Johnson | 8.0/10 | 80 | 2025 | “Sharon Van Etten is still queen of the quiet hour, but there’s no question now that she’s also one of our foremost rockstars.” |
| The Guardian via Wikipediaby Alexis Petridis | 4/5 | 80 | 2025 | “Fronting a brand new band, the singer-songwriter dives into the dark side, with confusion and foreboding creeping through 80s moods, big choruses and fine melodies” |
| Pitchfork via Wikipediaby Zach Schonfeld | 7.8/10 | 78 | 2025 | |
| The Line of Best Fit via Wikipediaby Chris Taylor | 7/10 | 70 | 2025 | “Sharon Van Etten & The Attachment Theory is never just one thing. There’s swaggering desert rock, moody Siouxsie Sioux-goth pop, and the cooly ethereal.” |
| AllMusic via Wikipediaby Marcy Donelson | 3.5/5 | 70 | 2025 |
Every Sunday: the week's new albums, scored by the critics. Plus our own reviews when we post them. Free, and one click to leave.
Sharon Van Etten & the Attachment Theory in Sharon Van Etten's catalog
How these critics usually treat Sharon Van Etten
- The Guardian Kinder than usual3 points below the other critics here. Usually 15 points below on Sharon Van Etten's other albums (3).
- AllMusic Harsher than usual14 points below the other critics here. Usually 1 point below on Sharon Van Etten's other albums (5).
- Pitchfork About usual for them5 points below the other critics here. Usually 1 point above on Sharon Van Etten's other albums (5).
- Rolling Stone About usual for them3 points below the other critics here. Usually 3 points below on Sharon Van Etten's other albums (4).
More from Sharon Van Etten
More Folk, Country & Americana from around 2025
Would you spin it again?
Be the first to answer. Results show once 3 listeners weigh in.
How the Breakdown works
Every outlet’s score is converted to 0–100 (2/5 is 40, 5.9/10 is 59, a B+ is 88) and averaged. Grades follow the B-Side scale: A is 90–100, B 80–89, C 70–79, D 60–69, F below 60. Approval is the share of critics who scored it 75 or higher; the Breakdown shows green at 75 and up, red below. Divisiveness asks a different question: not how many critics liked it, but how close their scores are to each other. Five critics who all give it 50 are Unanimous, even though none of them liked it. The labels run Unanimous, Broad agreement, Some debate, Divided, and Contentious. Replay rate comes from listeners, not critics: yes counts fully, a few tracks counts half, no counts zero. The gist quotes each outlet’s own summary of its review. Published is the date on the review itself, read from the outlet’s page, so you can see whether an album’s reputation came at release or years later. Scores marked est. come from reviews that publish no number. Scores marked via Wikipedia are archive ratings, mostly for older albums, taken from the “Professional ratings” box on the album’s Wikipedia page (published openly through Wikidata); each links to the original review when we can find it online, and to that Wikipedia entry when we can’t. When an outlet reviewed an album twice, years apart (often for a reissue), both scores count, each labeled with its year.
A-Side marks the critics’ top tier. An album earns it automatically, from its numbers alone: a Breakdown of 90 or higher, from at least 5 reviews, with at least 75% approval. Nobody hands it out and nobody can buy it; if new reviews pull an album below the line, it loses the badge.









Leave a Reply