Sharon Van Etten & the Attachment Theory

Sharon Van Etten – Sharon Van Etten & the Attachment Theory: B-Side Breakdown 82 (B-) from 10 critic reviews.

Album cover for Sharon Van Etten & the Attachment Theory by Sharon Van Etten
Released February 7, 2025
Shop on AmazonAs an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.
Sharon Van Etten

Sharon Van Etten & the Attachment Theory

82
B-Side BreakdownGrade B- · 10 critics · 80% approval
B-Side Breakdown82Grade: B-
Approval80%8 of 10 critics scored it 75 or higher
DivisivenessSome debateHow close the scores are: most critics land within 20 points of each other

Critics give Sharon Van Etten & the Attachment Theory a B-Side Breakdown of 82 (B-), from 10 reviews at outlets we track. Scores run 70 to 100.

The verdict on Sharon Van Etten & the Attachment Theory

8 of 10 critics liked it, with some disagreement on how much.

020406080100The Line of Best Fit: 70AllMusic: 70Pitchfork: 78PopMatters: 80Rolling Stone: 80Paste: 80The Guardian: 80Under the Radar: 85The Independent: 100DIY: 100 Breakdown 82
The gist
The Independent via Wikipediaby Helen Brown 5/5 100 2025 “Sensitively produced by Marta Salogni, the result is both seductive and hypnotic – it’s as though Van Etten has taken a creative stage dive and found herself held aloft by…”
DIY via Wikipediaby Joe Goggins 5/5 100 2025 “Songs which are anthemic in feel and universal in their lyricism.”
Under the Radar via Wikipediaby Kyle Mullin 8.5/10 85
PopMatters via Wikipediaby Patrick Gill 8/10 80 2025 “Sharon Van Etten & The Attachment Theory incorporate synths and darker sonic textures that suit the singer's cerebral thoughts and powerhouse vocals.”
Rolling Stone via Wikipediaby Rob Sheffield 4/5 80 2025 “Sharon Van Etten's 'Sharon Van Etten and the Attachment Theory' Review”
Paste via Wikipediaby Ellen Johnson 8.0/10 80 2025 “Sharon Van Etten is still queen of the quiet hour, but there’s no question now that she’s also one of our foremost rockstars.”
The Guardian via Wikipediaby Alexis Petridis 4/5 80 2025 “Fronting a brand new band, the singer-songwriter dives into the dark side, with confusion and foreboding creeping through 80s moods, big choruses and fine melodies”
Pitchfork via Wikipediaby Zach Schonfeld 7.8/10 78 2025
The Line of Best Fit via Wikipediaby Chris Taylor 7/10 70 2025 “Sharon Van Etten & The Attachment Theory is never just one thing. There’s swaggering desert rock, moody Siouxsie Sioux-goth pop, and the cooly ethereal.”
AllMusic via Wikipediaby Marcy Donelson 3.5/5 70 2025

Sharon Van Etten & the Attachment Theory in Sharon Van Etten's catalog

75Because I Was in Love (2009): 7474Tramp (2012): 8080Are We There (2014): 8383Remind Me Tomorrow (2019): 8484We’ve Been Going About This All Wrong (2022): 7474Sharon Van Etten & the Attachment Theory (2025): 8282This one2009
Sharon Van Etten's albums by B-Side Breakdown, in release order. Above the dashed line, most critics liked it. Every Sharon Van Etten album, ranked

How these critics usually treat Sharon Van Etten

  • The Guardian Kinder than usual3 points below the other critics here. Usually 15 points below on Sharon Van Etten's other albums (3).
  • AllMusic Harsher than usual14 points below the other critics here. Usually 1 point below on Sharon Van Etten's other albums (5).
  • Pitchfork About usual for them5 points below the other critics here. Usually 1 point above on Sharon Van Etten's other albums (5).
  • Rolling Stone About usual for them3 points below the other critics here. Usually 3 points below on Sharon Van Etten's other albums (4).

More from Sharon Van Etten

See all Sharon Van Etten albums ranked

More Folk, Country & Americana from around 2025

Would you spin it again?

Be the first to answer. Results show once 3 listeners weigh in.

How the Breakdown works

Every outlet’s score is converted to 0–100 (2/5 is 40, 5.9/10 is 59, a B+ is 88) and averaged. Grades follow the B-Side scale: A is 90–100, B 80–89, C 70–79, D 60–69, F below 60. Approval is the share of critics who scored it 75 or higher; the Breakdown shows green at 75 and up, red below. Divisiveness asks a different question: not how many critics liked it, but how close their scores are to each other. Five critics who all give it 50 are Unanimous, even though none of them liked it. The labels run Unanimous, Broad agreement, Some debate, Divided, and Contentious. Replay rate comes from listeners, not critics: yes counts fully, a few tracks counts half, no counts zero. The gist quotes each outlet’s own summary of its review. Published is the date on the review itself, read from the outlet’s page, so you can see whether an album’s reputation came at release or years later. Scores marked est. come from reviews that publish no number. Scores marked via Wikipedia are archive ratings, mostly for older albums, taken from the “Professional ratings” box on the album’s Wikipedia page (published openly through Wikidata); each links to the original review when we can find it online, and to that Wikipedia entry when we can’t. When an outlet reviewed an album twice, years apart (often for a reissue), both scores count, each labeled with its year.

A-Side marks the critics’ top tier. An album earns it automatically, from its numbers alone: a Breakdown of 90 or higher, from at least 5 reviews, with at least 75% approval. Nobody hands it out and nobody can buy it; if new reviews pull an album below the line, it loses the badge.

Report a problem


Discover more from B-Side Guys

Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.

Tags:

Leave a Reply