Critics give Are We There a B-Side Breakdown of 83 (Keeper), from 10 reviews at outlets we track. Scores run 60 to 100.
The verdict on Are We There
Most critics loved it: 9 of 10 liked it.
- Highest 100 The Independent
- Outlier 60 The Guardian, 20 points below the next-lowest score
- By the numbers The best-reviewed album of Sharon Van Etten's career on B-Side Breakdowns, ahead of Remind Me Tomorrow (82). The fourth best-reviewed Indie & Alternative album of 2014 we've tracked.
| The gist | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| The Independent via Wikipediaby Nick Coleman | 5/5 | 100 | 2014 | |
| Uncut via Wikipedia | 9/10 | 90 | 2014 | |
| Chicago Tribune via Wikipediaby Greg Kot | 3.5/4 | 88 | 2014 | |
| The A.V. Club via Wikipediaby Emily St. James | A- | 85 | 2014 | “Sharon Van Etten unleashes an epic that’s punishing—in a good way” |
| Pitchfork via Wikipediaby Stephen M. Deusner | 8.2/10 | 82 | 2014 | “Are We There may be Sharon Van Etten's most present-tense album to date, her most immediate and urgent—the peak of a steady upward trajectory. Her songs emphasize the moment, both…” |
| Rolling Stone via Wikipediaby Will Hermes | 4/5 | 80 | 2014 | “Check out our album review of Artist's Are We There on Rolling Stone.com.” |
| Q via Wikipedia | 4/5 | 80 | 2014 | |
| NME via Wikipediaby Rhian Daly | 8/10 | 80 | 2014 | “Sharon Van Etten’s fourth album represents a change in tack for the New Jersey singer. Her first three albums, starting with 2009’s ‘Because I Was In Love’, have shown off…” |
| AllMusic via Wikipediaby Fred Thomas | 4/5 | 80 | ||
| The Guardian via Wikipediaby Tim Jonze | 3/5 | 60 | 2014 | “Sharon Van Etten's recollections of an abusive relationship take your breath away with their shocking intimacy, but the music itself isn't always as impactful, writes Tim Jonze” |
Every Sunday: the week's new albums, scored by the critics. Plus our own reviews when we post them. Free, and one click to leave.
Are We There in Sharon Van Etten's catalog
How these critics usually treat Sharon Van Etten
- The Guardian Harsher than usual25 points below the other critics here. Usually 7 points below on Sharon Van Etten's other albums (3).
- Pitchfork About usual for them1 point below the other critics here. Usually 1 point above on Sharon Van Etten's other albums (5).
- NME About usual for them3 points below the other critics here. Usually 2 points below on Sharon Van Etten's other albums (3).
- Rolling Stone About usual for them3 points below the other critics here. Usually 2 points below on Sharon Van Etten's other albums (4).
- AllMusic About usual for them3 points below the other critics here. Usually 3 points below on Sharon Van Etten's other albums (5).
More from Sharon Van Etten
More Indie & Alternative from around 2014
Would you spin it again?
Be the first to answer. Results show once 3 listeners weigh in.
How the Breakdown works
Every outlet’s score is converted to 0–100 (2/5 is 40, 5.9/10 is 59) and averaged. A letter grade counts as the star rating it matches across thousands of reviews of the same albums, so a B+ is 75, like four stars, and a B is 65. Verdicts: Heavy Rotation is 85 and up, Keeper 70–84, Mixed Bag 55–69, Back of the Crate below 55. Approval is the share of critics who scored it 70 or higher (7/10, three and a half stars); the Breakdown shows green at 70 and up, red below. Divisiveness asks a different question: not how many critics liked it, but how close their scores are to each other. Five critics who all give it 50 are Unanimous, even though none of them liked it. The labels run Unanimous, Broad agreement, Some debate, Divided, and Contentious. Replay rate comes from listeners, not critics: yes counts fully, a few tracks counts half, no counts zero. The gist quotes each outlet’s own summary of its review. Published is the date on the review itself, read from the outlet’s page, so you can see whether an album’s reputation came at release or years later. Scores marked est. come from reviews that publish no number. Scores marked via Wikipedia are archive ratings, mostly for older albums, taken from the “Professional ratings” box on the album’s Wikipedia page (published openly through Wikidata); each links to the original review when we can find it online, and to that Wikipedia entry when we can’t. When an outlet reviewed an album twice, years apart (often for a reissue), both scores count, each labeled with its year.
A-Side marks the critics’ top tier. An album earns it automatically, from its numbers alone: a Breakdown of 90 or higher, from at least 5 reviews, with at least 75% approval. Nobody hands it out and nobody can buy it; if new reviews pull an album below the line, it loses the badge.









Leave a Reply