Tramp

Sharon Van Etten – Tramp: B-Side Breakdown 79 (Keeper) from 9 critic reviews.

Album cover for Tramp by Sharon Van Etten
Released February 7, 2012
Shop on AmazonAs an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.
Sharon Van Etten

Tramp

79
B-Side BreakdownKeeper · 9 critics · 100% approval
B-Side Breakdown79Keeper
Approval100%9 of 9 critics scored it 70 or higher
DivisivenessUnanimousHow close the scores are: most critics land within 10 points of each other

Critics give Tramp a B-Side Breakdown of 79 (Keeper), from 9 reviews at outlets we track. Scores run 70 to 90.

The verdict on Tramp

9 of 9 critics liked it, and they mostly agree.

020406080100AllMusic: 70Los Angeles Times: 75The A.V. Club: 75Pitchfork: 79Spin: 80Rolling Stone: 80Q: 80Mojo: 80NME: 90 Breakdown 79
The gist
NME via Wikipediaby Laura Snapes 9/10 90 2012 “Unless you’re closely attuned to the community of emotionally literate New York musicians who ride their hearts into battle, you might not have heard of [a]Sharon Van Etten[/a]. The New…”
Spin via Wikipediaby Jessica Suarez 8/10 80 2012
Rolling Stone via Wikipediaby Joe Gross 4/5 80 2012 “Check out our album review of Artist's Tramp on Rolling Stone.com.”
Q via Wikipedia 4/5 80 2012
Mojo via Wikipedia 4/5 80 2012
Pitchfork via Wikipediaby Rachael Maddux 7.9/10 79 2012 “The Brooklyn-based singer-songwriter's powerful third album, produced by the National's Aaron Dessner, features guest spots from Beirut's Zach Condon, Wye Oak's Jenn Wasner, Julianna Barwick, and Dessner's brother Bryce, among…”
Los Angeles Times via Wikipediaby Mikael Wood 3/4 75 2012 “This article was originally on a blog post platform and may be missing photos, graphics or links.”
The A.V. Club via Wikipediaby Steven Hyden B+ 75 2012
AllMusic via Wikipediaby Thom Jurek 3.5/5 70

Tramp in Sharon Van Etten's catalog

70Because I Was in Love (2009): 7474Tramp (2012): 7979This oneAre We There (2014): 8383Remind Me Tomorrow (2019): 8282We’ve Been Going About This All Wrong (2022): 7474Sharon Van Etten & the Attachment Theory (2025): 828220092025
Sharon Van Etten's albums by B-Side Breakdown, in release order. Above the dashed line, most critics liked it. Every Sharon Van Etten album, ranked

How these critics usually treat Sharon Van Etten

  • NME Kinder than usual13 points above the other critics here. Usually 7 points below on Sharon Van Etten's other albums (3).
  • AllMusic Harsher than usual10 points below the other critics here. Usually 1 point below on Sharon Van Etten's other albums (5).
  • Rolling Stone About usual for them1 point above the other critics here. Usually 3 points below on Sharon Van Etten's other albums (4).
  • Pitchfork About usual for themLevel with the other critics here. Usually 1 point above on Sharon Van Etten's other albums (5).

More from Sharon Van Etten

See all Sharon Van Etten albums ranked

More Indie & Alternative from around 2012

Would you spin it again?

Be the first to answer. Results show once 3 listeners weigh in.

How the Breakdown works

Every outlet’s score is converted to 0–100 (2/5 is 40, 5.9/10 is 59) and averaged. A letter grade counts as the star rating it matches across thousands of reviews of the same albums, so a B+ is 75, like four stars, and a B is 65. Verdicts: Heavy Rotation is 85 and up, Keeper 70–84, Mixed Bag 55–69, Back of the Crate below 55. Approval is the share of critics who scored it 70 or higher (7/10, three and a half stars); the Breakdown shows green at 70 and up, red below. Divisiveness asks a different question: not how many critics liked it, but how close their scores are to each other. Five critics who all give it 50 are Unanimous, even though none of them liked it. The labels run Unanimous, Broad agreement, Some debate, Divided, and Contentious. Replay rate comes from listeners, not critics: yes counts fully, a few tracks counts half, no counts zero. The gist quotes each outlet’s own summary of its review. Published is the date on the review itself, read from the outlet’s page, so you can see whether an album’s reputation came at release or years later. Scores marked est. come from reviews that publish no number. Scores marked via Wikipedia are archive ratings, mostly for older albums, taken from the “Professional ratings” box on the album’s Wikipedia page (published openly through Wikidata); each links to the original review when we can find it online, and to that Wikipedia entry when we can’t. When an outlet reviewed an album twice, years apart (often for a reissue), both scores count, each labeled with its year.

A-Side marks the critics’ top tier. An album earns it automatically, from its numbers alone: a Breakdown of 90 or higher, from at least 5 reviews, with at least 75% approval. Nobody hands it out and nobody can buy it; if new reviews pull an album below the line, it loses the badge.

Report a problem


Discover more from B-Side Guys

Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.

Tags:

Leave a Reply