Critics give We’ve Been Going About This All Wrong a B-Side Breakdown of 74 (Keeper), from 10 reviews at outlets we track. Scores run 60 to 84.
The verdict on We’ve Been Going About This All Wrong
8 of 10 critics liked it, and they mostly agree.
- Highest 84 Paste
- Lowest 60 NME and The Guardian
- Career Tied for #5 of Sharon Van Etten's 6 albums with a Breakdown
| The gist | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Paste via Wikipediaby Eric R. Danton | 8.4/10 | 84 | 2022 | “Paste Magazine is your source for the best music, movies, TV, comedy, videogames, books, comics, craft beer, politics and more. Discover your favorite albums and films.” |
| Under the Radar via Wikipediaby Matthew Berlyant | 8/10 | 80 | 2022 | “Sharon Van Etten returns with her follow-up to 2019’s Remind Me Tomorrow. Made during the pandemic in her home studio in her new hometown of Los Angeles (following many years…” |
| PopMatters via Wikipediaby Chris Ingalls | 8/10 | 80 | 2022 | “Sharon Van Etten grapples with love and parenthood in pandemic times in the ten deeply felt songs on We've Been Going About This All Wrong.” |
| Exclaim! via Wikipediaby Kaelen Bell | 8/10 | 80 | 2022 | |
| AllMusic via Wikipediaby Stephen Thomas Erlewine | 4/5 | 80 | ||
| Pitchfork via Wikipediaby Laura Snapes | 7.8/10 | 78 | 2022 | |
| Rolling Stone via Wikipediaby Jonathan Bernstein | 3.5/5 | 70 | 2022 | “Sharon Van Etten's 'We’ve Been Going About This All Wrong” |
| The Line of Best Fit via Wikipediaby Oliver Kuscher | 7/10 | 70 | 2022 | “We’ve Been Going About This All Wrong is Sharon Van Etten’s most here-in-the-now record” |
| NME via Wikipediaby Jordan Bassett | 3/5 | 60 | 2022 | “The artist's home-recorded sixth album sees her navigate her roles as a parent and musician and grapple with her demons” |
| The Guardian via Wikipediaby Kitty Empire | 3/5 | 60 | 2022 | “Holding it all together mid-pandemic, Van Etten’s sixth album of highs and lows struggles to strike a resounding chord” |
Every Sunday: the week's new albums, scored by the critics. Plus our own reviews when we post them. Free, and one click to leave.
We’ve Been Going About This All Wrong in Sharon Van Etten's catalog
How these critics usually treat Sharon Van Etten
- NME Harsher than usual16 points below the other critics here. Usually 2 points above on Sharon Van Etten's other albums (3).
- AllMusic Kinder than usual6 points above the other critics here. Usually 5 points below on Sharon Van Etten's other albums (5).
- The Guardian About usual for them16 points below the other critics here. Usually 10 points below on Sharon Van Etten's other albums (3).
- Pitchfork About usual for them4 points above the other critics here. Usually level with the others on Sharon Van Etten's other albums (5).
- Rolling Stone About usual for them5 points below the other critics here. Usually 2 points below on Sharon Van Etten's other albums (4).
More from Sharon Van Etten
← Earlier Remind Me Tomorrow (2019)Later → Sharon Van Etten & the Attachment Theory (2025)
More Indie & Alternative from around 2022
Would you spin it again?
Be the first to answer. Results show once 3 listeners weigh in.
How the Breakdown works
Every outlet’s score is converted to 0–100 (2/5 is 40, 5.9/10 is 59) and averaged. A letter grade counts as the star rating it matches across thousands of reviews of the same albums, so a B+ is 75, like four stars, and a B is 65. Verdicts: Heavy Rotation is 85 and up, Keeper 70–84, Mixed Bag 55–69, Back of the Crate below 55. Approval is the share of critics who scored it 70 or higher (7/10, three and a half stars); the Breakdown shows green at 70 and up, red below. Divisiveness asks a different question: not how many critics liked it, but how close their scores are to each other. Five critics who all give it 50 are Unanimous, even though none of them liked it. The labels run Unanimous, Broad agreement, Some debate, Divided, and Contentious. Replay rate comes from listeners, not critics: yes counts fully, a few tracks counts half, no counts zero. The gist quotes each outlet’s own summary of its review. Published is the date on the review itself, read from the outlet’s page, so you can see whether an album’s reputation came at release or years later. Scores marked est. come from reviews that publish no number. Scores marked via Wikipedia are archive ratings, mostly for older albums, taken from the “Professional ratings” box on the album’s Wikipedia page (published openly through Wikidata); each links to the original review when we can find it online, and to that Wikipedia entry when we can’t. When an outlet reviewed an album twice, years apart (often for a reissue), both scores count, each labeled with its year.
A-Side marks the critics’ top tier. An album earns it automatically, from its numbers alone: a Breakdown of 90 or higher, from at least 5 reviews, with at least 75% approval. Nobody hands it out and nobody can buy it; if new reviews pull an album below the line, it loses the badge.









Leave a Reply