Critics give Remind Me Tomorrow a B-Side Breakdown of 82 (Keeper), from 8 reviews at outlets we track. Scores run 75 to 90.
The verdict on Remind Me Tomorrow
8 of 8 critics liked it, and they mostly agree.
- Highest 90 AllMusic
- Lowest 75 The A.V. Club
- Career Tied for #2 of Sharon Van Etten's 6 albums with a Breakdown
- By the numbers Sharon Van Etten's best-reviewed album here since Are We There (2014).
| The gist | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| AllMusic via Wikipediaby Stephen Thomas Erlewine | 4.5/5 | 90 | ||
| Chicago Tribune via Wikipediaby Greg Kot | 3.5/4 | 88 | 2019 | “Sharon Van Etten took a break after her 2014 album, “Are We There,” which tied together many of the themes that dominated the first phase of her career. In a…” |
| Pitchfork via Wikipediaby Laura Snapes | 8.4/10 | 84 | 2019 | “On her fifth album, Sharon Van Etten conjures tempests and explores their subsequent calms. It is the peak of her songwriting and her most atmospheric, emotionally piercing album to date.” |
| Rolling Stone via Wikipediaby Jon Dolan | 4/5 | 80 | 2019 | “The singer-songwriter balances darkness and dreams on a fantastic new album” |
| NME via Wikipediaby Thomas Smith | 4/5 | 80 | 2019 | “The New Jersey songwriter flips the script with an electrifying pop album with plenty of heart on 'Remind Me Tomorrow” |
| The Independent via Wikipediaby Jazz Monroe | 4/5 | 80 | 2019 | “Alongside Angel Olsen, she’s reimagined the form with ballads that are introspective yet assertive, unafraid to plunge into personal quandaries without providing songwriterly reassurance” |
| The Guardian via Wikipediaby Rachel Aroesti | 4/5 | 80 | 2019 | “Van Etten’s decision to shift to electronic instruments only adds to the thrill on this arresting album” |
| The A.V. Club via Wikipediaby Annie Zaleski | B+ | 75 | 2019 | “Sharon Van Etten embraces the here and now on Remind Me Tomorrow” |
Every Sunday: the week's new albums, scored by the critics. Plus our own reviews when we post them. Free, and one click to leave.
Remind Me Tomorrow in Sharon Van Etten's catalog
How these critics usually treat Sharon Van Etten
- AllMusic Kinder than usual9 points above the other critics here. Usually 5 points below on Sharon Van Etten's other albums (5).
- The Guardian Kinder than usual2 points below the other critics here. Usually 14 points below on Sharon Van Etten's other albums (3).
- Pitchfork About usual for them2 points above the other critics here. Usually 1 point above on Sharon Van Etten's other albums (5).
- NME About usual for them2 points below the other critics here. Usually 2 points below on Sharon Van Etten's other albums (3).
- Rolling Stone About usual for them2 points below the other critics here. Usually 2 points below on Sharon Van Etten's other albums (4).
More from Sharon Van Etten
← Earlier Are We There (2014)Later → We’ve Been Going About This All Wrong (2022)
More Indie & Alternative from around 2019
Would you spin it again?
Be the first to answer. Results show once 3 listeners weigh in.
How the Breakdown works
Every outlet’s score is converted to 0–100 (2/5 is 40, 5.9/10 is 59) and averaged. A letter grade counts as the star rating it matches across thousands of reviews of the same albums, so a B+ is 75, like four stars, and a B is 65. Verdicts: Heavy Rotation is 85 and up, Keeper 70–84, Mixed Bag 55–69, Back of the Crate below 55. Approval is the share of critics who scored it 70 or higher (7/10, three and a half stars); the Breakdown shows green at 70 and up, red below. Divisiveness asks a different question: not how many critics liked it, but how close their scores are to each other. Five critics who all give it 50 are Unanimous, even though none of them liked it. The labels run Unanimous, Broad agreement, Some debate, Divided, and Contentious. Replay rate comes from listeners, not critics: yes counts fully, a few tracks counts half, no counts zero. The gist quotes each outlet’s own summary of its review. Published is the date on the review itself, read from the outlet’s page, so you can see whether an album’s reputation came at release or years later. Scores marked est. come from reviews that publish no number. Scores marked via Wikipedia are archive ratings, mostly for older albums, taken from the “Professional ratings” box on the album’s Wikipedia page (published openly through Wikidata); each links to the original review when we can find it online, and to that Wikipedia entry when we can’t. When an outlet reviewed an album twice, years apart (often for a reissue), both scores count, each labeled with its year.
A-Side marks the critics’ top tier. An album earns it automatically, from its numbers alone: a Breakdown of 90 or higher, from at least 5 reviews, with at least 75% approval. Nobody hands it out and nobody can buy it; if new reviews pull an album below the line, it loses the badge.









Leave a Reply