Because I Was in Love

Sharon Van Etten – Because I Was in Love: B-Side Breakdown 74 (C) from 3 critic reviews.

Album cover for Because I Was in Love by Sharon Van Etten
Released May 26, 2009
Shop on AmazonAs an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.
Sharon Van Etten

Because I Was in Love

74
B-Side BreakdownGrade C · 3 critics · 67% approval
B-Side Breakdown74Grade: C
Approval67%2 of 3 critics scored it 75 or higher
DivisivenessUnanimousHow close the scores are: most critics land within 6 points of each other

Early reviews. Critics give Because I Was in Love an early B-Side Breakdown of 74 (C), from 3 reviews so far. It will settle as more outlets weigh in.

The verdict on Because I Was in Love

So far, 2 of 3 critics liked it.

020406080100AllMusic: 70The Line of Best Fit: 75Pitchfork: 77 Breakdown 74
The gist
Pitchfork via Wikipediaby Matthew Murphy 7.7/10 77 2009 “Brooklyn's Sharon Van Etten displays the expressive voice and songwriting chops of peers such as Alela Diane, Marissa Nadler, and Jana Hunter.”
The Line of Best Fitby Joe Goggins 7.5/10 75 2017 “At a time of profound personal development, the Brooklyn singer-songwriter casts a tender eye back to the beginning.”
AllMusic via Wikipedia 3.5/5 70

Because I Was in Love in Sharon Van Etten's catalog

75Because I Was in Love (2009): 7474This oneTramp (2012): 8080Are We There (2014): 8383Remind Me Tomorrow (2019): 8484We’ve Been Going About This All Wrong (2022): 7474Sharon Van Etten & the Attachment Theory (2025): 82822025
Sharon Van Etten's albums by B-Side Breakdown, in release order. Above the dashed line, most critics liked it. Every Sharon Van Etten album, ranked

How these critics usually treat Sharon Van Etten

  • Pitchfork About usual for them5 points above the other critics here. Usually 1 point below on Sharon Van Etten's other albums (5).
  • AllMusic About usual for them6 points below the other critics here. Usually 3 points below on Sharon Van Etten's other albums (5).

More from Sharon Van Etten

See all Sharon Van Etten albums ranked

More Folk, Country & Americana from around 2009

Would you spin it again?

Be the first to answer. Results show once 3 listeners weigh in.

How the Breakdown works

Every outlet’s score is converted to 0–100 (2/5 is 40, 5.9/10 is 59, a B+ is 88) and averaged. Grades follow the B-Side scale: A is 90–100, B 80–89, C 70–79, D 60–69, F below 60. Approval is the share of critics who scored it 75 or higher; the Breakdown shows green at 75 and up, red below. Divisiveness asks a different question: not how many critics liked it, but how close their scores are to each other. Five critics who all give it 50 are Unanimous, even though none of them liked it. The labels run Unanimous, Broad agreement, Some debate, Divided, and Contentious. Replay rate comes from listeners, not critics: yes counts fully, a few tracks counts half, no counts zero. The gist quotes each outlet’s own summary of its review. Published is the date on the review itself, read from the outlet’s page, so you can see whether an album’s reputation came at release or years later. Scores marked est. come from reviews that publish no number. Scores marked via Wikipedia are archive ratings, mostly for older albums, taken from the “Professional ratings” box on the album’s Wikipedia page (published openly through Wikidata); each links to the original review when we can find it online, and to that Wikipedia entry when we can’t. When an outlet reviewed an album twice, years apart (often for a reissue), both scores count, each labeled with its year.

A-Side marks the critics’ top tier. An album earns it automatically, from its numbers alone: a Breakdown of 90 or higher, from at least 5 reviews, with at least 75% approval. Nobody hands it out and nobody can buy it; if new reviews pull an album below the line, it loses the badge.

Report a problem


Discover more from B-Side Guys

Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.

Tags:

Leave a Reply