Gargoyle

Mark Lanegan – Gargoyle: B-Side Breakdown 79 (C+) from 9 critic reviews.

Album cover for Gargoyle by Mark Lanegan
Released April 28, 2017
Shop on AmazonAs an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.
Mark Lanegan

Gargoyle

79
B-Side BreakdownGrade C+ · 9 critics · 78% approval
B-Side Breakdown79Grade: C+
Approval78%7 of 9 critics scored it 75 or higher
DivisivenessBroad agreementHow close the scores are: most critics land within 18 points of each other

Critics give Gargoyle a B-Side Breakdown of 79 (C+), from 9 reviews at outlets we track. Scores run 63 to 100.

The verdict on Gargoyle

7 of 9 critics liked it, and they mostly agree.

020406080100Pitchfork: 63Clash: 70Record Collector: 80Uncut: 80Q: 80The Independent: 80The Guardian: 80AllMusic: 80Mojo: 100 Breakdown 79
The gist
Mojo via Wikipedia 5/5 100 2017
Record Collector via Wikipediaby Sue Matiz 4/5 80 2017 “The story of Mark Lanegan’s latest album begins with the return of a favour. Having contributed to a project helmed by guitarist and friend Rob Marshall”
Uncut via Wikipediaby John Lewis 8/10 80 2017
Q via Wikipediaby Andy Fyfe 4/5 80 2017
The Independent via Wikipediaby Andy Gill 4/5 80 2017 “Also: Fujiya & Miyagi, Ciaran Lavery and Angaleena Presley”
The Guardian via Wikipediaby Dave Simpson 4/5 80 2017
AllMusic via Wikipediaby Mark Deming 4/5 80
Clash via Wikipediaby Josh Gray 7/10 70 2017 “There was a time when the news that Mark Lanegan was releasing a record on Heavenly Recordings might have raised some eyebrows. How could signing the”
Pitchfork via Wikipediaby Saby Reyes-Kulkarni 6.3/10 63 2017 “On Mark Lanegan’s 10th solo album, his leather voice and slow-burning songwriting play up the pulp and noir that’s been with him his entire career.”

Gargoyle in Mark Lanegan's catalog

75The Winding Sheet (1990): 7070Whiskey for the Holy Ghost (1993): 8282Scraps at Midnight (1998): 7676I’ll Take Care of You (1999): 7171Field Songs (2001): 7575Bubblegum (2004): 8282Blues Funeral (2012): 7676Black Pudding (2013): 7171Imitations (2013): 6464Phantom Radio (2014): 7575Gargoyle (2017): 7979This one1990
Mark Lanegan's albums by B-Side Breakdown, in release order. Above the dashed line, most critics liked it. Every Mark Lanegan album, ranked

How these critics usually treat Mark Lanegan

  • Pitchfork Harsher than usual18 points below the other critics here. Usually 3 points below on Mark Lanegan's other albums (8).
  • The Guardian About usual for them1 point above the other critics here. Usually 2 points below on Mark Lanegan's other albums (5).
  • Uncut About usual for them1 point above the other critics here. Usually 3 points above on Mark Lanegan's other albums (4).
  • AllMusic About usual for them1 point above the other critics here. Usually level with the others on Mark Lanegan's other albums (10).
  • Q About usual for them1 point above the other critics here. Usually 1 point above on Mark Lanegan's other albums (6).

More from Mark Lanegan

See all Mark Lanegan albums ranked

More Indie & Alternative from around 2017

Would you spin it again?

Be the first to answer. Results show once 3 listeners weigh in.

How the Breakdown works

Every outlet’s score is converted to 0–100 (2/5 is 40, 5.9/10 is 59, a B+ is 88) and averaged. Grades follow the B-Side scale: A is 90–100, B 80–89, C 70–79, D 60–69, F below 60. Approval is the share of critics who scored it 75 or higher; the Breakdown shows green at 75 and up, red below. Divisiveness asks a different question: not how many critics liked it, but how close their scores are to each other. Five critics who all give it 50 are Unanimous, even though none of them liked it. The labels run Unanimous, Broad agreement, Some debate, Divided, and Contentious. Replay rate comes from listeners, not critics: yes counts fully, a few tracks counts half, no counts zero. The gist quotes each outlet’s own summary of its review. Published is the date on the review itself, read from the outlet’s page, so you can see whether an album’s reputation came at release or years later. Scores marked est. come from reviews that publish no number. Scores marked via Wikipedia are archive ratings, mostly for older albums, taken from the “Professional ratings” box on the album’s Wikipedia page (published openly through Wikidata); each links to the original review when we can find it online, and to that Wikipedia entry when we can’t. When an outlet reviewed an album twice, years apart (often for a reissue), both scores count, each labeled with its year.

A-Side marks the critics’ top tier. An album earns it automatically, from its numbers alone: a Breakdown of 90 or higher, from at least 5 reviews, with at least 75% approval. Nobody hands it out and nobody can buy it; if new reviews pull an album below the line, it loses the badge.

Report a problem


Discover more from B-Side Guys

Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.

Tags:

Leave a Reply