Early reviews. Critics give Imitations an early B-Side Breakdown of 64 (D), from 4 reviews so far. It will settle as more outlets weigh in.
The verdict on Imitations
So far, 0 of 4 critics liked it.
- Highest 70 AllMusic
- Lowest 60 NME and The Guardian
- By the numbers The lowest score of Mark Lanegan's 11 albums with a Breakdown.
| The gist | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| AllMusic via Wikipediaby Thom Jurek | 3.5/5 | 70 | ||
| Pitchfork via Wikipediaby Jason Heller | 6.6/10 | 66 | 2013 | “Mark Lanegan's new Imitations is a self-effacingly-titled collection of reimagined cover songs featuring tunes from Frank Sinatra, Hank Williams, Chelsea Wolfe and more.” |
| NME via Wikipediaby Jeremy Allan | 6/10 | 60 | ||
| The Guardian via Wikipediaby Michael Hann | 3/5 | 60 | 2013 | “Mark Lanegan's new pipe-and-slippers album features perfectly pleasurable versions of songs made famous by Andy Williams, Nick Cave and others, writes Michael Hann” |
Every Sunday: the week's new albums, scored by the critics. Plus our own reviews when we post them. Free, and one click to leave.
Imitations in Mark Lanegan's catalog
How these critics usually treat Mark Lanegan
- Pitchfork Kinder than usual3 points above the other critics here. Usually 6 points below on Mark Lanegan's other albums (8).
- AllMusic Kinder than usual8 points above the other critics here. Usually 1 point below on Mark Lanegan's other albums (10).
- The Guardian About usual for them5 points below the other critics here. Usually level with the others on Mark Lanegan's other albums (5).
- NME About usual for them5 points below the other critics here. Usually 3 points below on Mark Lanegan's other albums (3).
More from Mark Lanegan
More Rock from around 2013
Would you spin it again?
Be the first to answer. Results show once 3 listeners weigh in.
How the Breakdown works
Every outlet’s score is converted to 0–100 (2/5 is 40, 5.9/10 is 59, a B+ is 88) and averaged. Grades follow the B-Side scale: A is 90–100, B 80–89, C 70–79, D 60–69, F below 60. Approval is the share of critics who scored it 75 or higher; the Breakdown shows green at 75 and up, red below. Divisiveness asks a different question: not how many critics liked it, but how close their scores are to each other. Five critics who all give it 50 are Unanimous, even though none of them liked it. The labels run Unanimous, Broad agreement, Some debate, Divided, and Contentious. Replay rate comes from listeners, not critics: yes counts fully, a few tracks counts half, no counts zero. The gist quotes each outlet’s own summary of its review. Published is the date on the review itself, read from the outlet’s page, so you can see whether an album’s reputation came at release or years later. Scores marked est. come from reviews that publish no number. Scores marked via Wikipedia are archive ratings, mostly for older albums, taken from the “Professional ratings” box on the album’s Wikipedia page (published openly through Wikidata); each links to the original review when we can find it online, and to that Wikipedia entry when we can’t. When an outlet reviewed an album twice, years apart (often for a reissue), both scores count, each labeled with its year.
A-Side marks the critics’ top tier. An album earns it automatically, from its numbers alone: a Breakdown of 90 or higher, from at least 5 reviews, with at least 75% approval. Nobody hands it out and nobody can buy it; if new reviews pull an album below the line, it loses the badge.









Leave a Reply