Blues Funeral

Mark Lanegan – Blues Funeral: B-Side Breakdown 76 (C) from 10 critic reviews.

Album cover for Blues Funeral by Mark Lanegan
Released February 3, 2012
Shop on AmazonAs an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.
Mark Lanegan

Blues Funeral

76
B-Side BreakdownGrade C · 10 critics · 50% approval
B-Side Breakdown76Grade: C
Approval50%5 of 10 critics scored it 75 or higher
DivisivenessSome debateHow close the scores are: most critics land within 28 points of each other

Critics give Blues Funeral a B-Side Breakdown of 76 (C), from 10 reviews at outlets we track. Scores run 59 to 100.

The verdict on Blues Funeral

5 of 10 critics liked it. A mixed reception.

020406080100Pitchfork: 59Rolling Stone: 60The Guardian: 60AllMusic: 70The A.V. Club: 71Uncut: 80Spin: 80Q: 80The Independent: 100Mojo: 100 Breakdown 76
The gist
The Independent via Wikipediaby Andy Gill 5/5 100 2012
Mojo via Wikipediaby Keith Cameron 5/5 100 2012
Uncut via Wikipedia 4/5 80 2012
Spin via Wikipediaby David Peisner 8/10 80 2012 “8SPIN Rating: 8 of 10Release Date: February 07, 2012Label: 4ADIs it really possible that Mark Lanegan hasn't already put out an album called Blues”
Q via Wikipedia 4/5 80 2012
The A.V. Club via Wikipediaby Jason Heller C- 71 2012 “Mark Lanegan Band: Blues Funeral”
AllMusic via Wikipediaby Thom Jurek 3.5/5 70
Rolling Stone via Wikipediaby Will Hermes 3/5 60 2012 “Check out our album review of Artist's Blues Funeral on Rolling Stone.com.”
The Guardian via Wikipediaby Tom Hughes 3/5 60 2012 “There's definitely some music in here somewhere – but feels like a long haul, says Tom Hughes”
Pitchfork via Wikipediaby Ian Cohen 5.9/10 59 2012 “Citing albums by Kraftwerk, Joy Division, and Roxy Music as influences, the Gutter Twins/ex-Screaming Trees vocalist's first solo album since 2004 incorporates drum machines and oozing synths into the mix.”

Blues Funeral in Mark Lanegan's catalog

75The Winding Sheet (1990): 7070Whiskey for the Holy Ghost (1993): 8282Scraps at Midnight (1998): 7676I’ll Take Care of You (1999): 7171Field Songs (2001): 7575Bubblegum (2004): 8282Blues Funeral (2012): 7676This oneBlack Pudding (2013): 7171Imitations (2013): 6464Phantom Radio (2014): 7575Gargoyle (2017): 797919902017
Mark Lanegan's albums by B-Side Breakdown, in release order. Above the dashed line, most critics liked it. Every Mark Lanegan album, ranked

How these critics usually treat Mark Lanegan

  • The Guardian Harsher than usual18 points below the other critics here. Usually 2 points above on Mark Lanegan's other albums (5).
  • Pitchfork Harsher than usual19 points below the other critics here. Usually 3 points below on Mark Lanegan's other albums (8).
  • AllMusic About usual for them7 points below the other critics here. Usually 1 point above on Mark Lanegan's other albums (10).
  • Q About usual for them4 points above the other critics here. Usually level with the others on Mark Lanegan's other albums (6).
  • Uncut About usual for them4 points above the other critics here. Usually 2 points above on Mark Lanegan's other albums (4).

More from Mark Lanegan

See all Mark Lanegan albums ranked

More Indie & Alternative from around 2012

Would you spin it again?

Be the first to answer. Results show once 3 listeners weigh in.

How the Breakdown works

Every outlet’s score is converted to 0–100 (2/5 is 40, 5.9/10 is 59, a B+ is 88) and averaged. Grades follow the B-Side scale: A is 90–100, B 80–89, C 70–79, D 60–69, F below 60. Approval is the share of critics who scored it 75 or higher; the Breakdown shows green at 75 and up, red below. Divisiveness asks a different question: not how many critics liked it, but how close their scores are to each other. Five critics who all give it 50 are Unanimous, even though none of them liked it. The labels run Unanimous, Broad agreement, Some debate, Divided, and Contentious. Replay rate comes from listeners, not critics: yes counts fully, a few tracks counts half, no counts zero. The gist quotes each outlet’s own summary of its review. Published is the date on the review itself, read from the outlet’s page, so you can see whether an album’s reputation came at release or years later. Scores marked est. come from reviews that publish no number. Scores marked via Wikipedia are archive ratings, mostly for older albums, taken from the “Professional ratings” box on the album’s Wikipedia page (published openly through Wikidata); each links to the original review when we can find it online, and to that Wikipedia entry when we can’t. When an outlet reviewed an album twice, years apart (often for a reissue), both scores count, each labeled with its year.

A-Side marks the critics’ top tier. An album earns it automatically, from its numbers alone: a Breakdown of 90 or higher, from at least 5 reviews, with at least 75% approval. Nobody hands it out and nobody can buy it; if new reviews pull an album below the line, it loses the badge.

Report a problem


Discover more from B-Side Guys

Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.

Tags:

Leave a Reply