Critics give Bubblegum a B-Side Breakdown of 82 (B-), from 10 reviews at outlets we track. Scores run 72 to 95.
The verdict on Bubblegum
9 of 10 critics liked it, and they mostly agree.
- Highest 95 Entertainment Weekly
- Lowest 72 Pitchfork
- By the numbers The best-reviewed album of Mark Lanegan's career on B-Side Breakdowns, ahead of Whiskey for the Holy Ghost (82). The fifth best-reviewed Indie & Alternative album of 2004 we've tracked.
| The gist | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Entertainment Weekly via Wikipediaby David Browne | A | 95 | 2004 | |
| Spin via Wikipedia | B+ | 88 | 2004 | |
| Los Angeles Times via Wikipediaby Steve Appleford | 3.5/4 | 88 | 2004 | “R. Kelly puts his legal strife aside in a fine new set” |
| Q via Wikipedia | 4/5 | 80 | 2006 | |
| Uncut via Wikipedia | 4/5 | 80 | 2004 | |
| NME via Wikipediaby James Jam | 8/10 | 80 | 2005 | “Before we begin, there’s something you should know about American roots renaissance man Mark Lanegan. Former frontman with misunderstood grunge tearjerkers [a]Screaming Trees[/a], sometime [a]Queens Of The Stone Age[/a] vocalist…” |
| The Guardian via Wikipediaby Alexis Petridis | 4/5 | 80 | 2004 | |
| Blender via Wikipedia | 4/5 | 80 | 2006 | |
| AllMusic via Wikipediaby Mark Deming | 4/5 | 80 | ||
| Pitchfork via Wikipediaby Matthew Murphy | 7.2/10 | 72 | 2004 |
Every Sunday: the week's new albums, scored by the critics. Plus our own reviews when we post them. Free, and one click to leave.
More from Mark Lanegan
More Indie & Alternative from around 2004
Would you spin it again?
Be the first to answer. Results show once 3 listeners weigh in.
How the Breakdown works
Every outlet’s score is converted to 0–100 (2/5 is 40, 5.9/10 is 59, a B+ is 88) and averaged. Grades follow the B-Side scale: A is 90–100, B 80–89, C 70–79, D 60–69, F below 60. Approval is the share of critics who scored it 75 or higher; the Breakdown shows green at 75 and up, red below. Divisiveness asks a different question: not how many critics liked it, but how close their scores are to each other. Five critics who all give it 50 are Unanimous, even though none of them liked it. The labels run Unanimous, Broad agreement, Some debate, Divided, and Contentious. Replay rate comes from listeners, not critics: yes counts fully, a few tracks counts half, no counts zero. The gist quotes each outlet’s own summary of its review. Published is the date on the review itself, read from the outlet’s page, so you can see whether an album’s reputation came at release or years later. Scores marked est. come from reviews that publish no number. Scores marked via Wikipedia are archive ratings, mostly for older albums, taken from the “Professional ratings” box on the album’s Wikipedia page (published openly through Wikidata); each links to the original review when we can find it online, and to that Wikipedia entry when we can’t. When an outlet reviewed an album twice, years apart (often for a reissue), both scores count, each labeled with its year.
A-Side marks the critics’ top tier. An album earns it automatically, from its numbers alone: a Breakdown of 90 or higher, from at least 5 reviews, with at least 75% approval. Nobody hands it out and nobody can buy it; if new reviews pull an album below the line, it loses the badge.










Leave a Reply