Bubblegum

Mark Lanegan – Bubblegum: B-Side Breakdown 82 (B-) from 10 critic reviews.

Album cover for Bubblegum by Mark Lanegan
Released August 2, 2004
Shop on AmazonAs an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.
Mark Lanegan

Bubblegum

82
B-Side BreakdownGrade B- · 10 critics · 90% approval
B-Side Breakdown82Grade: B-
Approval90%9 of 10 critics scored it 75 or higher
DivisivenessBroad agreementHow close the scores are: most critics land within 12 points of each other

Critics give Bubblegum a B-Side Breakdown of 82 (B-), from 10 reviews at outlets we track. Scores run 72 to 95.

The verdict on Bubblegum

9 of 10 critics liked it, and they mostly agree.

  • Highest 95 Entertainment Weekly
  • Lowest 72 Pitchfork
  • By the numbers The best-reviewed album of Mark Lanegan's career on B-Side Breakdowns, ahead of Whiskey for the Holy Ghost (82). The fifth best-reviewed Indie & Alternative album of 2004 we've tracked.
020406080100Pitchfork: 72Q: 80Uncut: 80NME: 80The Guardian: 80Blender: 80AllMusic: 80Spin: 88Los Angeles Times: 88Entertainment Weekly: 95 Breakdown 82
The gist
Entertainment Weekly via Wikipediaby David Browne A 95 2004
Spin via Wikipedia B+ 88 2004
Los Angeles Times via Wikipediaby Steve Appleford 3.5/4 88 2004 “R. Kelly puts his legal strife aside in a fine new set”
Q via Wikipedia 4/5 80 2006
Uncut via Wikipedia 4/5 80 2004
NME via Wikipediaby James Jam 8/10 80 2005 “Before we begin, there’s something you should know about American roots renaissance man Mark Lanegan. Former frontman with misunderstood grunge tearjerkers [a]Screaming Trees[/a], sometime [a]Queens Of The Stone Age[/a] vocalist…”
The Guardian via Wikipediaby Alexis Petridis 4/5 80 2004
Blender via Wikipedia 4/5 80 2006
AllMusic via Wikipediaby Mark Deming 4/5 80
Pitchfork via Wikipediaby Matthew Murphy 7.2/10 72 2004

More from Mark Lanegan

See all Mark Lanegan albums ranked

More Indie & Alternative from around 2004

Would you spin it again?

Be the first to answer. Results show once 3 listeners weigh in.

How the Breakdown works

Every outlet’s score is converted to 0–100 (2/5 is 40, 5.9/10 is 59, a B+ is 88) and averaged. Grades follow the B-Side scale: A is 90–100, B 80–89, C 70–79, D 60–69, F below 60. Approval is the share of critics who scored it 75 or higher; the Breakdown shows green at 75 and up, red below. Divisiveness asks a different question: not how many critics liked it, but how close their scores are to each other. Five critics who all give it 50 are Unanimous, even though none of them liked it. The labels run Unanimous, Broad agreement, Some debate, Divided, and Contentious. Replay rate comes from listeners, not critics: yes counts fully, a few tracks counts half, no counts zero. The gist quotes each outlet’s own summary of its review. Published is the date on the review itself, read from the outlet’s page, so you can see whether an album’s reputation came at release or years later. Scores marked est. come from reviews that publish no number. Scores marked via Wikipedia are archive ratings, mostly for older albums, taken from the “Professional ratings” box on the album’s Wikipedia page (published openly through Wikidata); each links to the original review when we can find it online, and to that Wikipedia entry when we can’t. When an outlet reviewed an album twice, years apart (often for a reissue), both scores count, each labeled with its year.

A-Side marks the critics’ top tier. An album earns it automatically, from its numbers alone: a Breakdown of 90 or higher, from at least 5 reviews, with at least 75% approval. Nobody hands it out and nobody can buy it; if new reviews pull an album below the line, it loses the badge.

Report a problem


Discover more from B-Side Guys

Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.

Tags:

Leave a Reply