Early reviews. Critics give Black Pudding an early B-Side Breakdown of 71 (C-), from 5 reviews so far. It will settle as more outlets weigh in.
The verdict on Black Pudding
Most critics weren't won over: 1 of 5 liked it.
- Highest 80 The Guardian
- Lowest 67 Pitchfork
- Career Tied for #6 of Mark Lanegan's 9 albums with a Breakdown
| The gist | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| The Guardian via Wikipediaby Graeme Virtue | 4/5 | 80 | 2013 | “Lanegan's barbed-wire baritone sounds richer than ever – and you can also tell he's enjoying himself, writes Graeme Virtue” |
| Sputnikmusic via Wikipediaby Raul Stanciu | 3.5/5 | 70 | 2013 | “Mark Lanegan and Duke Garwood – Black Pudding review: Dark Mark goes western.” |
| PopMatters via Wikipediaby Cole Waterman | 7/10 | 70 | 2013 | “For the past decade or so, Mark Lanegan has been on something of a mission to expand his sonic palette, both through his collaborations and in his solo work.” |
| AllMusic via Wikipediaby Thom Jurek | 3.5/5 | 70 | 2013 | |
| Pitchfork via Wikipediaby Steven Hyden | 6.7/10 | 67 | 2013 | “Mark Lanegan is back to working with a musical co-pilot here, though British multi-instrumentalist Duke Garwood's accompaniments are rather subsumed by Lanegan's outsized personality. Black Pudding offers scarifying dirges and…” |
Every Sunday: the week's new albums, scored by the critics. Plus our own reviews when we post them. Free, and one click to leave.
Black Pudding in Mark Lanegan's catalog
How these critics usually treat Mark Lanegan
- The Guardian Kinder than usual11 points above the other critics here. Usually 9 points below on Mark Lanegan's other albums (3).
- Pitchfork About usual for them6 points below the other critics here. Usually 2 points below on Mark Lanegan's other albums (6).
- AllMusic About usual for them2 points below the other critics here. Usually 1 point above on Mark Lanegan's other albums (8).
More from Mark Lanegan
More Rock from around 2013
Would you spin it again?
Be the first to answer. Results show once 3 listeners weigh in.
How the Breakdown works
Every outlet’s score is converted to 0–100 (2/5 is 40, 5.9/10 is 59, a B+ is 88) and averaged. Grades follow the B-Side scale: A is 90–100, B 80–89, C 70–79, D 60–69, F below 60. Approval is the share of critics who scored it 75 or higher; the Breakdown shows green at 75 and up, red below. Divisiveness asks a different question: not how many critics liked it, but how close their scores are to each other. Five critics who all give it 50 are Unanimous, even though none of them liked it. The labels run Unanimous, Broad agreement, Some debate, Divided, and Contentious. Replay rate comes from listeners, not critics: yes counts fully, a few tracks counts half, no counts zero. The gist quotes each outlet’s own summary of its review. Published is the date on the review itself, read from the outlet’s page, so you can see whether an album’s reputation came at release or years later. Scores marked est. come from reviews that publish no number. Scores marked via Wikipedia are archive ratings, mostly for older albums, taken from the “Professional ratings” box on the album’s Wikipedia page (published openly through Wikidata); each links to the original review when we can find it online, and to that Wikipedia entry when we can’t. When an outlet reviewed an album twice, years apart (often for a reissue), both scores count, each labeled with its year.
A-Side marks the critics’ top tier. An album earns it automatically, from its numbers alone: a Breakdown of 90 or higher, from at least 5 reviews, with at least 75% approval. Nobody hands it out and nobody can buy it; if new reviews pull an album below the line, it loses the badge.









Leave a Reply