Bone Machine

Tom Waits – Bone Machine: B-Side Breakdown 90 (A-) from 10 critic reviews.

Album cover for Bone Machine by Tom Waits
Released August 1992
Shop on AmazonAs an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.
Tom Waits

Bone Machine

90 A-Side: the critics' top tier
B-Side BreakdownGrade A- · 10 critics · 100% approval
B-Side Breakdown90Grade: A-
Approval100%10 of 10 critics scored it 75 or higher
DivisivenessBroad agreementHow close the scores are: most critics land within 18 points of each other

Based on 10 reviews from outlets we track. Scores run 80 to 100.

By the numbers: Tom Waits's best-reviewed album here since Rain Dogs (1985). The third best-reviewed album of 1992 we've tracked.

020406080100Uncut: 80NME: 80Q: 80Rolling Stone: 80Los Angeles Times: 88AllMusic: 90Entertainment Weekly: 98Select: 100Chicago Tribune: 100Mojo: 100 Breakdown 90
The gist
Select via Wikipedia 5/5 100
Chicago Tribune via Wikipedia 4/4 100 “Tom WaitsBone Machine (Island) (STAR)(STAR)(STAR)(STAR) Even Waits` admirers acknowledge that he`s an acquired taste: that gravel-pit voice, those shaggy-dog tunes, the freakshow characters. He`s a love-him-or-leave-him artist who at his…”
Mojo via Wikipedia 5/5 100
Entertainment Weekly via Wikipedia A+ 98
AllMusic via Wikipedia 4.5/5 90
Los Angeles Times via Wikipedia 3.5/4 88 “TOM WAITS "Bone Machine" Island * * *1/2 For the musical equivalent of Clint Eastwood's "Unforgiven"–basically, an extended riff on its key line "we've all got it coming"–try "Bone Machine,"…”
Uncut via Wikipedia 4/5 80
NME via Wikipedia 8/10 80
Q via Wikipedia 4/5 80
Rolling Stone via Wikipedia 4/5 80 “Check out our album review of Artist's Bone Machine on Rolling Stone.com.”

From B-Side Guys

More from Tom Waits

See all Tom Waits albums ranked

More Rock from around 1992

Would you spin it again?

Be the first to answer. Results show once 3 listeners weigh in.

How the Breakdown works

Every outlet’s score is converted to 0–100 (2/5 is 40, 5.9/10 is 59, a B+ is 88) and averaged. Grades follow the B-Side scale: A is 90–100, B 80–89, C 70–79, D 60–69, F below 60. Approval is the share of critics who scored it 75 or higher; the Breakdown shows green at 75 and up, red below. Divisiveness asks a different question: not how many critics liked it, but how close their scores are to each other. Five critics who all give it 50 are Unanimous, even though none of them liked it. The labels run Unanimous, Broad agreement, Some debate, Divided, and Contentious. Replay rate comes from listeners, not critics: yes counts fully, a few tracks counts half, no counts zero. The gist quotes each outlet’s own summary of its review. Published is the date on the review itself, read from the outlet’s page, so you can see whether an album’s reputation came at release or years later. Scores marked est. come from reviews that publish no number. Scores marked via Wikipedia are archive ratings, mostly for older albums, taken from the “Professional ratings” box on the album’s Wikipedia page (published openly through Wikidata); each links to the original review when we can find it online, and to that Wikipedia entry when we can’t. When an outlet reviewed an album twice, years apart (often for a reissue), both scores count, each labeled with its year.

A-Side marks the critics’ top tier. An album earns it automatically, from its numbers alone: a Breakdown of 85 or higher, from at least 5 reviews, with at least 75% approval. Nobody hands it out and nobody can buy it; if new reviews pull an album below the line, it loses the badge.

Report a problem

Tags:

Leave a Reply