Based on 9 reviews from outlets we track. Scores run 40 to 90.
By the numbers: Scores ran from 40 (Q) to 90 (musicOMH).
| The gist | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| musicOMHby John Murphy | 4.5/5 | 90 | 2004 | “An industrial clanking, eerie atmospherics and then that voice – a mysterious, growling, croaking instrument completely unlike anything you've ever heard.” |
| Entertainment Weekly via Wikipedia | B+ | 88 | ||
| Pitchfork via Wikipedia | 8.0/10 | 80 | “18th proper studio album from the gruff-voiced singer/songwriter serves marks a departure from 2002's Alice and Blood Money, with an emphasis on mouth-made percussion. Avant-garde guitarist Marc Ribot guests for…” | |
| The Guardian via Wikipedia | 4/5 | 80 | ||
| Mojo via Wikipedia | 4/5 | 80 | ||
| AllMusic via Wikipedia | 3.5/5 | 70 | ||
| NME via Wikipedia | 7/10 | 70 | ||
| Rolling Stone via Wikipedia | 3/5 | 60 | “Check out our album review of Artist's Real Gone on Rolling Stone.com.” | |
| Q via Wikipedia | 2/5 | 40 | 2004 |
From B-Side Guys
More from Tom Waits
More Indie & Alternative from around 2004
Would you spin it again?
Be the first to answer. Results show once 3 listeners weigh in.
How the Breakdown works
Every outlet’s score is converted to 0–100 (2/5 is 40, 5.9/10 is 59, a B+ is 88) and averaged. Grades follow the B-Side scale: A is 90–100, B 80–89, C 70–79, D 60–69, F below 60. Approval is the share of critics who scored it 75 or higher; the Breakdown shows green at 75 and up, red below. Divisiveness asks a different question: not how many critics liked it, but how close their scores are to each other. Five critics who all give it 50 are Unanimous, even though none of them liked it. The labels run Unanimous, Broad agreement, Some debate, Divided, and Contentious. Replay rate comes from listeners, not critics: yes counts fully, a few tracks counts half, no counts zero. The gist quotes each outlet’s own summary of its review. Published is the date on the review itself, read from the outlet’s page, so you can see whether an album’s reputation came at release or years later. Scores marked est. come from reviews that publish no number. Scores marked via Wikipedia are archive ratings, mostly for older albums, taken from the “Professional ratings” box on the album’s Wikipedia page (published openly through Wikidata); each links to the original review when we can find it online, and to that Wikipedia entry when we can’t. When an outlet reviewed an album twice, years apart (often for a reissue), both scores count, each labeled with its year.
A-Side marks the critics’ top tier. An album earns it automatically, from its numbers alone: a Breakdown of 90 or higher, from at least 5 reviews, with at least 75% approval. Nobody hands it out and nobody can buy it; if new reviews pull an album below the line, it loses the badge.










Leave a Reply