Based on 9 reviews from outlets we track. Scores run 60 to 100.
By the numbers: Tom Waits's best-reviewed album here since Bone Machine (1992). The third best-reviewed album of 2011 we've tracked.
| The gist | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| The Independent via Wikipedia | 5/5 | 100 | |
| The Telegraph via Wikipedia | 5/5 | 100 | |
| Entertainment Weekly via Wikipedia | A- | 91 | |
| Pitchfork via Wikipedia | 8.1/10 | 81 | “Featuring contributions from longtime bandleader Marc Ribot, Keith Richards, and Flea, among others, Bad as Me is Tom Waits' first proper collection of studio material since 2004's Real Gone. He…” |
| The Guardian via Wikipedia | 4/5 | 80 | “The least surprising thing about a new Waits album? That it's great. By Dave Simpson” |
| Rolling Stone via Wikipedia | 4/5 | 80 | “Check out our album review of Artist's Bad As Me on Rolling Stone.com.” |
| Spin via Wikipedia | 8/10 | 80 | “It's rare to call anyone's 17th album urgent, but it feels like rocking fast and getting to the point never even ?occurred to Tom Waits before now. Bad as” |
| AllMusic via Wikipedia | 4/5 | 80 | |
| NME via Wikipedia | 6/10 | 60 | “You don’t have to be old to start baying like a hellhound at the prospect of a new [a]Tom Waits[/a] record. The postmodern blues croaker has enjoyed a career arc…” |
From B-Side Guys
More from Tom Waits
More Rock from around 2011
Would you spin it again?
Be the first to answer. Results show once 3 listeners weigh in.
How the Breakdown works
Every outlet’s score is converted to 0–100 (2/5 is 40, 5.9/10 is 59, a B+ is 88) and averaged. Grades follow the B-Side scale: A is 90–100, B 80–89, C 70–79, D 60–69, F below 60. Approval is the share of critics who scored it 75 or higher; the Breakdown shows green at 75 and up, red below. Divisiveness asks a different question: not how many critics liked it, but how close their scores are to each other. Five critics who all give it 50 are Unanimous, even though none of them liked it. The labels run Unanimous, Broad agreement, Some debate, Divided, and Contentious. Replay rate comes from listeners, not critics: yes counts fully, a few tracks counts half, no counts zero. The gist quotes each outlet’s own summary of its review. Published is the date on the review itself, read from the outlet’s page, so you can see whether an album’s reputation came at release or years later. Scores marked est. come from reviews that publish no number. Scores marked via Wikipedia are archive ratings, mostly for older albums, taken from the “Professional ratings” box on the album’s Wikipedia page (published openly through Wikidata); each links to the original review when we can find it online, and to that Wikipedia entry when we can’t. When an outlet reviewed an album twice, years apart (often for a reissue), both scores count, each labeled with its year.
A-Side marks the critics’ top tier. An album earns it automatically, from its numbers alone: a Breakdown of 85 or higher, from at least 5 reviews, with at least 75% approval. Nobody hands it out and nobody can buy it; if new reviews pull an album below the line, it loses the badge.










Leave a Reply