Shootenanny!

Eels – Shootenanny!: B-Side Breakdown 64 (D) from 10 critic reviews.

Album cover for Shootenanny! by Eels
Released May 28, 2003
Shop on AmazonAs an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.
Eels

Shootenanny!

64
B-Side BreakdownGrade D · 10 critics · 40% approval
B-Side Breakdown64Grade: D
Approval40%4 of 10 critics scored it 75 or higher
DivisivenessDividedHow close the scores are: most critics land within 36 points of each other

Critics give Shootenanny! a B-Side Breakdown of 64 (D), from 10 reviews at outlets we track. Scores run 28 to 88.

The verdict on Shootenanny!

Critics split on this one: scores run from 28 (Pitchfork) to 88 (Entertainment Weekly).

020406080100Pitchfork: 28The Guardian: 40Robert Christgau: 55Blender: 60Stylus Magazine: 63The Rolling Stone Album Guide: 70Spin: 75Rolling Stone: 80AllMusic: 80Entertainment Weekly: 88 Breakdown 64
The gist
Entertainment Weekly via Wikipediaby Greg Kot B+ 88 2003
Rolling Stone via Wikipediaby Jason Fine 4/5 80 2003
AllMusic via Wikipediaby Stephen Thomas Erlewine 4/5 80
Spin via Wikipediaby Rob Harvilla C 75 2003 “From the concert stage to the dressing room, from the recording studio to the digital realm, SPIN surveys the modern musical landscape and the culture around it with authoritative reporting,…”
The Rolling Stone Album Guide via Wikipediaby Charles R. Cross 3.5/5 70 2004 “Previously published as: Rolling Stone album guide”
Stylus Magazine via Wikipediaby Dom Passantino 6.3/10 63 2003
Blender via Wikipedia 3/5 60 2020 “The authority on kitchen blender appliance for the home or business, providing expert blender reviews to help consumers make the best buying decision.”
Robert Christgau via Wikipediaby Robert Christgau Dud 55 2004
The Guardian via Wikipediaby David Peschek 2/5 40 2003
Pitchfork via Wikipediaby Chris Dahlen 2.8/10 28 2003 “Let's set aside that the Eels are not for everyone. Some folks can't stand frontman E's sense …”

Shootenanny! in Eels's catalog

75Beautiful Freak (1996): 80Electro-Shock Blues (1998): 81Daisies of the Galaxy (1999): 76Souljacker (2001): 66Shootenanny! (2003): 6464This oneBlinking Lights and Other Revelations (2005): 81Hombre Lobo (2009): 72End Times (2010): 66Tomorrow Morning (2010): 66Wonderful, Glorious (2013): 73The Cautionary Tales of Mark Oliver Everett (2014): 62The Deconstruction (2018): 55Extreme Witchcraft (2022): 6719962022
Eels's albums by B-Side Breakdown, in release order. Above the dashed line, most critics liked it. Every Eels album, ranked

How these critics usually treat Eels

  • Rolling Stone Kinder than usual18 points above the other critics here. Usually 7 points below on Eels's other albums (5).
  • The Guardian Harsher than usual27 points below the other critics here. Usually 2 points below on Eels's other albums (9).
  • The Rolling Stone Album Guide Kinder than usual7 points above the other critics here. Usually 14 points below on Eels's other albums (3).
  • AllMusic Kinder than usual18 points above the other critics here. Usually 2 points above on Eels's other albums (9).
  • Spin Kinder than usual12 points above the other critics here. Usually 3 points below on Eels's other albums (4).
  • Entertainment Weekly Kinder than usual27 points above the other critics here. Usually 12 points above on Eels's other albums (4).

More from Eels

See all Eels albums ranked

More Rock from around 2003

Would you spin it again?

Be the first to answer. Results show once 3 listeners weigh in.

How the Breakdown works

Every outlet’s score is converted to 0–100 (2/5 is 40, 5.9/10 is 59, a B+ is 88) and averaged. Grades follow the B-Side scale: A is 90–100, B 80–89, C 70–79, D 60–69, F below 60. Approval is the share of critics who scored it 75 or higher; the Breakdown shows green at 75 and up, red below. Divisiveness asks a different question: not how many critics liked it, but how close their scores are to each other. Five critics who all give it 50 are Unanimous, even though none of them liked it. The labels run Unanimous, Broad agreement, Some debate, Divided, and Contentious. Replay rate comes from listeners, not critics: yes counts fully, a few tracks counts half, no counts zero. The gist quotes each outlet’s own summary of its review. Published is the date on the review itself, read from the outlet’s page, so you can see whether an album’s reputation came at release or years later. Scores marked est. come from reviews that publish no number. Scores marked via Wikipedia are archive ratings, mostly for older albums, taken from the “Professional ratings” box on the album’s Wikipedia page (published openly through Wikidata); each links to the original review when we can find it online, and to that Wikipedia entry when we can’t. When an outlet reviewed an album twice, years apart (often for a reissue), both scores count, each labeled with its year.

A-Side marks the critics’ top tier. An album earns it automatically, from its numbers alone: a Breakdown of 90 or higher, from at least 5 reviews, with at least 75% approval. Nobody hands it out and nobody can buy it; if new reviews pull an album below the line, it loses the badge.

Report a problem

Tags:

Leave a Reply