Critics give Souljacker a B-Side Breakdown of 65 (Mixed Bag), from 9 reviews at outlets we track. Scores run 49 to 80.
The verdict on Souljacker
4 of 9 critics liked it. A mixed reception.
- Highest 80 Q and Alternative Press
- Lowest 49 Pitchfork
- Career #10 of Eels's 13 albums with a Breakdown
| The gist | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q via Wikipedia | 4/5 | 80 | 2005 | |
| Alternative Press via Wikipedia | 4/5 | 80 | 2005 | |
| Rolling Stone via Wikipediaby Mark Kemp | 3.5/5 | 70 | 2002 | |
| NME via Wikipediaby Andre Paine | 7/10 | 70 | 2005 | “E from Eels has the potential to be among the best rock stars in the world. Reclusive and intelligent, he falls somewhere between Chris Morris (for comic effect, publicity shots…” |
| Slantby Sal Cinquemani | 3/5 | 60 | 2002 | “The Eels’s fourth album, Souljacker, teams frontman E with John Parish, best known for his work with PJ Harvey.” |
| The Rolling Stone Album Guide via Wikipediaby Charles R. Cross | 3/5 | 60 | 2004 | “Previously published as: Rolling Stone album guide” |
| Blender via Wikipedia | 3/5 | 60 | 2020 | “The authority on kitchen blender appliance for the home or business, providing expert blender reviews to help consumers make the best buying decision.” |
| AllMusic via Wikipediaby Tim DiGravina | 3/5 | 60 | ||
| Pitchfork via Wikipediaby Dominique Leone | 4.9/10 | 49 | 2002 | “Beyond the melodies that don't stick in my head and the beats thatrn don't make me …” |
Every Sunday: the week's new albums, scored by the critics. Plus our own reviews when we post them. Free, and one click to leave.
Souljacker in Eels's catalog
How these critics usually treat Eels
- Q Kinder than usual16 points above the other critics here. Usually 4 points below on Eels's other albums (4).
- Slant Kinder than usual6 points below the other critics here. Usually 23 points below on Eels's other albums (3).
- AllMusic Harsher than usual6 points below the other critics here. Usually 7 points above on Eels's other albums (9).
- Pitchfork Kinder than usual19 points below the other critics here. Usually 30 points below on Eels's other albums (6).
- Rolling Stone About usual for them5 points above the other critics here. Usually 2 points below on Eels's other albums (5).
- NME About usual for them5 points above the other critics here. Usually 2 points above on Eels's other albums (8).
More from Eels
← Earlier Daisies of the Galaxy (1999)Later → Shootenanny! (2003)
More Rock from around 2001
Would you spin it again?
Be the first to answer. Results show once 3 listeners weigh in.
How the Breakdown works
Every outlet’s score is converted to 0–100 (2/5 is 40, 5.9/10 is 59) and averaged. A letter grade counts as the star rating it matches across thousands of reviews of the same albums, so a B+ is 75, like four stars, and a B is 65. Verdicts: Heavy Rotation is 85 and up, Keeper 70–84, Mixed Bag 55–69, Back of the Crate below 55. Approval is the share of critics who scored it 70 or higher (7/10, three and a half stars); the Breakdown shows green at 70 and up, red below. Divisiveness asks a different question: not how many critics liked it, but how close their scores are to each other. Five critics who all give it 50 are Unanimous, even though none of them liked it. The labels run Unanimous, Broad agreement, Some debate, Divided, and Contentious. Replay rate comes from listeners, not critics: yes counts fully, a few tracks counts half, no counts zero. The gist quotes each outlet’s own summary of its review. Published is the date on the review itself, read from the outlet’s page, so you can see whether an album’s reputation came at release or years later. Scores marked est. come from reviews that publish no number. Scores marked via Wikipedia are archive ratings, mostly for older albums, taken from the “Professional ratings” box on the album’s Wikipedia page (published openly through Wikidata); each links to the original review when we can find it online, and to that Wikipedia entry when we can’t. When an outlet reviewed an album twice, years apart (often for a reissue), both scores count, each labeled with its year.
A-Side marks the critics’ top tier. An album earns it automatically, from its numbers alone: a Breakdown of 90 or higher, from at least 5 reviews, with at least 75% approval. Nobody hands it out and nobody can buy it; if new reviews pull an album below the line, it loses the badge.










Leave a Reply