Souljacker

Eels – Souljacker: B-Side Breakdown 65 (Mixed Bag) from 9 critic reviews.

Album cover for Souljacker by Eels
Released September 19, 2001
Shop on AmazonAs an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.
Eels

Souljacker

65
B-Side BreakdownMixed Bag · 9 critics · 44% approval
B-Side Breakdown65Mixed Bag
Approval44%4 of 9 critics scored it 70 or higher
DivisivenessSome debateHow close the scores are: most critics land within 20 points of each other

Critics give Souljacker a B-Side Breakdown of 65 (Mixed Bag), from 9 reviews at outlets we track. Scores run 49 to 80.

The verdict on Souljacker

4 of 9 critics liked it. A mixed reception.

020406080100Pitchfork: 49Slant: 60The Rolling Stone Album Guide: 60Blender: 60AllMusic: 60Rolling Stone: 70NME: 70Q: 80Alternative Press: 80 Breakdown 65
The gist
Q via Wikipedia 4/5 80 2005
Alternative Press via Wikipedia 4/5 80 2005
Rolling Stone via Wikipediaby Mark Kemp 3.5/5 70 2002
NME via Wikipediaby Andre Paine 7/10 70 2005 “E from Eels has the potential to be among the best rock stars in the world. Reclusive and intelligent, he falls somewhere between Chris Morris (for comic effect, publicity shots…”
Slantby Sal Cinquemani 3/5 60 2002 “The Eels’s fourth album, Souljacker, teams frontman E with John Parish, best known for his work with PJ Harvey.”
The Rolling Stone Album Guide via Wikipediaby Charles R. Cross 3/5 60 2004 “Previously published as: Rolling Stone album guide”
Blender via Wikipedia 3/5 60 2020 “The authority on kitchen blender appliance for the home or business, providing expert blender reviews to help consumers make the best buying decision.”
AllMusic via Wikipediaby Tim DiGravina 3/5 60
Pitchfork via Wikipediaby Dominique Leone 4.9/10 49 2002 “Beyond the melodies that don't stick in my head and the beats thatrn don't make me …”

Souljacker in Eels's catalog

70Beautiful Freak (1996): 78Electro-Shock Blues (1998): 79Daisies of the Galaxy (1999): 75Souljacker (2001): 6565This oneShootenanny! (2003): 60Blinking Lights and Other Revelations (2005): 81Hombre Lobo (2009): 72End Times (2010): 66Tomorrow Morning (2010): 66Wonderful, Glorious (2013): 72The Cautionary Tales of Mark Oliver Everett (2014): 60The Deconstruction (2018): 55Extreme Witchcraft (2022): 6719962022
Eels's albums by B-Side Breakdown, in release order. Above the dashed line, most critics liked it. Every Eels album, ranked

How these critics usually treat Eels

  • Q Kinder than usual16 points above the other critics here. Usually 4 points below on Eels's other albums (4).
  • Slant Kinder than usual6 points below the other critics here. Usually 23 points below on Eels's other albums (3).
  • AllMusic Harsher than usual6 points below the other critics here. Usually 7 points above on Eels's other albums (9).
  • Pitchfork Kinder than usual19 points below the other critics here. Usually 30 points below on Eels's other albums (6).
  • Rolling Stone About usual for them5 points above the other critics here. Usually 2 points below on Eels's other albums (5).
  • NME About usual for them5 points above the other critics here. Usually 2 points above on Eels's other albums (8).

More from Eels

See all Eels albums ranked

More Rock from around 2001

Would you spin it again?

Be the first to answer. Results show once 3 listeners weigh in.

How the Breakdown works

Every outlet’s score is converted to 0–100 (2/5 is 40, 5.9/10 is 59) and averaged. A letter grade counts as the star rating it matches across thousands of reviews of the same albums, so a B+ is 75, like four stars, and a B is 65. Verdicts: Heavy Rotation is 85 and up, Keeper 70–84, Mixed Bag 55–69, Back of the Crate below 55. Approval is the share of critics who scored it 70 or higher (7/10, three and a half stars); the Breakdown shows green at 70 and up, red below. Divisiveness asks a different question: not how many critics liked it, but how close their scores are to each other. Five critics who all give it 50 are Unanimous, even though none of them liked it. The labels run Unanimous, Broad agreement, Some debate, Divided, and Contentious. Replay rate comes from listeners, not critics: yes counts fully, a few tracks counts half, no counts zero. The gist quotes each outlet’s own summary of its review. Published is the date on the review itself, read from the outlet’s page, so you can see whether an album’s reputation came at release or years later. Scores marked est. come from reviews that publish no number. Scores marked via Wikipedia are archive ratings, mostly for older albums, taken from the “Professional ratings” box on the album’s Wikipedia page (published openly through Wikidata); each links to the original review when we can find it online, and to that Wikipedia entry when we can’t. When an outlet reviewed an album twice, years apart (often for a reissue), both scores count, each labeled with its year.

A-Side marks the critics’ top tier. An album earns it automatically, from its numbers alone: a Breakdown of 90 or higher, from at least 5 reviews, with at least 75% approval. Nobody hands it out and nobody can buy it; if new reviews pull an album below the line, it loses the badge.

Report a problem


Discover more from B-Side Guys

Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.

Tags:

Leave a Reply