End Times

Eels – End Times: B-Side Breakdown 66 (Mixed Bag) from 8 critic reviews.

Album cover for End Times by Eels
Released January 18, 2010
Shop on AmazonAs an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.
Eels

End Times

66
B-Side BreakdownMixed Bag · 8 critics · 63% approval
B-Side Breakdown66Mixed Bag
Approval63%5 of 8 critics scored it 70 or higher
DivisivenessDividedHow close the scores are: most critics land within 34 points of each other

Critics give End Times a B-Side Breakdown of 66 (Mixed Bag), from 8 reviews at outlets we track. Scores run 39 to 80.

The verdict on End Times

Critics split on this one: scores run from 39 (Pitchfork) to 80 (NME and 3 others).

020406080100Pitchfork: 39Slant: 40Rolling Stone: 60Spin: 70NME: 80Drowned in Sound: 80The Guardian: 80AllMusic: 80 Breakdown 66
The gist
NME via Wikipedia 8/10 80
Drowned in Sound via Wikipediaby Kevin EG Perry 4/5 80 2010 “End Times is a break-up album that lashes relationship breakdown onto societal collapse, and rarely has Everett sounded so plaintive, so utterly br…”
The Guardian via Wikipediaby Will Dean 4/5 80 2010 “Mark Everett and Eels' second album in six months isn't quite a work of staggering genius, but it's heartbreaking all the same, says Will Dean”
AllMusic via Wikipediaby Thom Jurek 4/5 80 2009
Spin via Wikipediaby Barry Walters 3.5/5 70 2009 “7SPIN Rating: 7 of 10Release Date: January 18, 2010Label: E Works/VagrantBecause every Eels disc feels like a breakup album, this overt and actual one may”
Rolling Stone via Wikipediaby Christian Hoard 3/5 60 2010
Slant via Wikipediaby Steve Erickson 2/5 40 Nov 7, 2026 “Reviews of the latest music, as well as lists and interviews with your favorite musicians, producers, and more.”
Pitchfork via Wikipediaby Zach Kelly 3.9/10 39 2010 “Mark Oliver Everett returns with another record of sadsack self-pity, without even the tinges of humor that typically color his work.”

End Times in Eels's catalog

70Beautiful Freak (1996): 78Electro-Shock Blues (1998): 79Daisies of the Galaxy (1999): 75Souljacker (2001): 65Shootenanny! (2003): 60Blinking Lights and Other Revelations (2005): 81Hombre Lobo (2009): 72End Times (2010): 6666This oneTomorrow Morning (2010): 66Wonderful, Glorious (2013): 72The Cautionary Tales of Mark Oliver Everett (2014): 60The Deconstruction (2018): 55Extreme Witchcraft (2022): 6719962022
Eels's albums by B-Side Breakdown, in release order. Above the dashed line, most critics liked it. Every Eels album, ranked

How these critics usually treat Eels

  • The Guardian Kinder than usual16 points above the other critics here. Usually 5 points below on Eels's other albums (9).
  • NME Kinder than usual16 points above the other critics here. Usually 1 point above on Eels's other albums (8).
  • Slant Harsher than usual30 points below the other critics here. Usually 15 points below on Eels's other albums (3).
  • AllMusic Kinder than usual16 points above the other critics here. Usually 4 points above on Eels's other albums (9).
  • Spin Kinder than usual4 points above the other critics here. Usually 6 points below on Eels's other albums (4).
  • Rolling Stone About usual for them7 points below the other critics here. Usually level with the others on Eels's other albums (5).

More from Eels

See all Eels albums ranked

More Indie & Alternative from around 2010

Would you spin it again?

Be the first to answer. Results show once 3 listeners weigh in.

How the Breakdown works

Every outlet’s score is converted to 0–100 (2/5 is 40, 5.9/10 is 59) and averaged. A letter grade counts as the star rating it matches across thousands of reviews of the same albums, so a B+ is 75, like four stars, and a B is 65. Verdicts: Heavy Rotation is 85 and up, Keeper 70–84, Mixed Bag 55–69, Back of the Crate below 55. Approval is the share of critics who scored it 70 or higher (7/10, three and a half stars); the Breakdown shows green at 70 and up, red below. Divisiveness asks a different question: not how many critics liked it, but how close their scores are to each other. Five critics who all give it 50 are Unanimous, even though none of them liked it. The labels run Unanimous, Broad agreement, Some debate, Divided, and Contentious. Replay rate comes from listeners, not critics: yes counts fully, a few tracks counts half, no counts zero. The gist quotes each outlet’s own summary of its review. Published is the date on the review itself, read from the outlet’s page, so you can see whether an album’s reputation came at release or years later. Scores marked est. come from reviews that publish no number. Scores marked via Wikipedia are archive ratings, mostly for older albums, taken from the “Professional ratings” box on the album’s Wikipedia page (published openly through Wikidata); each links to the original review when we can find it online, and to that Wikipedia entry when we can’t. When an outlet reviewed an album twice, years apart (often for a reissue), both scores count, each labeled with its year.

A-Side marks the critics’ top tier. An album earns it automatically, from its numbers alone: a Breakdown of 90 or higher, from at least 5 reviews, with at least 75% approval. Nobody hands it out and nobody can buy it; if new reviews pull an album below the line, it loses the badge.

Report a problem


Discover more from B-Side Guys

Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.

Tags:

Leave a Reply