Hombre Lobo

Eels – Hombre Lobo: B-Side Breakdown 72 (Keeper) from 8 critic reviews.

Album cover for Hombre Lobo by Eels
Released May 29, 2009
Shop on AmazonAs an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.
Eels

Hombre Lobo

72
B-Side BreakdownKeeper · 8 critics · 75% approval
B-Side Breakdown72Keeper
Approval75%6 of 8 critics scored it 70 or higher
DivisivenessSome debateHow close the scores are: most critics land within 24 points of each other

Critics give Hombre Lobo a B-Side Breakdown of 72 (Keeper), from 8 reviews at outlets we track. Scores run 46 to 80.

The verdict on Hombre Lobo

6 of 8 critics liked it, with some disagreement on how much.

020406080100Pitchfork: 46Spin: 60PopMatters: 70Uncut: 80Record Collector: 80Mojo: 80The Guardian: 80AllMusic: 80 Breakdown 72
The gist
Uncut via Wikipediaby Andrew Mueller 4/5 80 2009
Record Collector via Wikipediaby Jake Kennedy 4/5 80 2009 “Mark Everett (or E) is something of an uncategorisable genius/ oddball, many would have you believe. Really, he’s only really “odd” in”
Mojo via Wikipediaby James McNair 4/5 80 2009
The Guardian via Wikipediaby Dave Simpson 4/5 80 2009
AllMusic via Wikipediaby Thom Jurek 4/5 80 2009
PopMatters via Wikipedia 3.5/5 70
Spin via Wikipediaby Lindsey Thomas 3/5 60 2009 “Mark Oliver Everett takes his latest album title quite literally, unleashing predatory howls over distortion-ridden stompers like "Fresh Blood," only to”
Pitchfork via Wikipediaby Ian Cohen 4.6/10 46 2009 “Juke-joint pastiche and songs about hopelessness– hey, it's the latest Eels record. His first LP of new music in four years.”

Hombre Lobo in Eels's catalog

70Beautiful Freak (1996): 78Electro-Shock Blues (1998): 79Daisies of the Galaxy (1999): 75Souljacker (2001): 65Shootenanny! (2003): 60Blinking Lights and Other Revelations (2005): 81Hombre Lobo (2009): 7272This oneEnd Times (2010): 66Tomorrow Morning (2010): 66Wonderful, Glorious (2013): 72The Cautionary Tales of Mark Oliver Everett (2014): 60The Deconstruction (2018): 55Extreme Witchcraft (2022): 6719962022
Eels's albums by B-Side Breakdown, in release order. Above the dashed line, most critics liked it. Every Eels album, ranked

How these critics usually treat Eels

  • The Guardian Kinder than usual9 points above the other critics here. Usually 4 points below on Eels's other albums (9).
  • Spin Harsher than usual14 points below the other critics here. Usually 2 points below on Eels's other albums (4).
  • AllMusic About usual for them9 points above the other critics here. Usually 5 points above on Eels's other albums (9).
  • Uncut About usual for them9 points above the other critics here. Usually 7 points above on Eels's other albums (3).
  • Pitchfork About usual for them30 points below the other critics here. Usually 28 points below on Eels's other albums (6).

More from Eels

See all Eels albums ranked

More Indie & Alternative from around 2009

Would you spin it again?

Be the first to answer. Results show once 3 listeners weigh in.

How the Breakdown works

Every outlet’s score is converted to 0–100 (2/5 is 40, 5.9/10 is 59) and averaged. A letter grade counts as the star rating it matches across thousands of reviews of the same albums, so a B+ is 75, like four stars, and a B is 65. Verdicts: Heavy Rotation is 85 and up, Keeper 70–84, Mixed Bag 55–69, Back of the Crate below 55. Approval is the share of critics who scored it 70 or higher (7/10, three and a half stars); the Breakdown shows green at 70 and up, red below. Divisiveness asks a different question: not how many critics liked it, but how close their scores are to each other. Five critics who all give it 50 are Unanimous, even though none of them liked it. The labels run Unanimous, Broad agreement, Some debate, Divided, and Contentious. Replay rate comes from listeners, not critics: yes counts fully, a few tracks counts half, no counts zero. The gist quotes each outlet’s own summary of its review. Published is the date on the review itself, read from the outlet’s page, so you can see whether an album’s reputation came at release or years later. Scores marked est. come from reviews that publish no number. Scores marked via Wikipedia are archive ratings, mostly for older albums, taken from the “Professional ratings” box on the album’s Wikipedia page (published openly through Wikidata); each links to the original review when we can find it online, and to that Wikipedia entry when we can’t. When an outlet reviewed an album twice, years apart (often for a reissue), both scores count, each labeled with its year.

A-Side marks the critics’ top tier. An album earns it automatically, from its numbers alone: a Breakdown of 90 or higher, from at least 5 reviews, with at least 75% approval. Nobody hands it out and nobody can buy it; if new reviews pull an album below the line, it loses the badge.

Report a problem


Discover more from B-Side Guys

Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.

Tags:

Leave a Reply