Critics give Celestial Lineage a B-Side Breakdown of 84 (B), from 8 reviews at outlets we track. Scores run 80 to 95.
The verdict on Celestial Lineage
8 of 8 critics liked it, and they mostly agree.
- Highest 95 The A.V. Club
- Lowest 80 Uncut, Mojo, Clash and 2 more
- By the numbers The best-reviewed album of Wolves in the Throne Room's career on B-Side Breakdowns, ahead of Diadem of 12 Stars (79). The tenth best-reviewed album of 2011 we've tracked.
| The gist | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| The A.V. Club via Wikipediaby Jason Heller | A | 95 | 2011 | “Wolves In The Throne Room: Celestial Lineage” |
| AllMusic via Wikipedia | 4.5/5 | 90 | ||
| Pitchfork via Wikipediaby Brandon Stosuy | 8.6/10 | 86 | 2011 | “The Olympia, Wash., black-metal band returns with the climactic, colossal, final installment in a trilogy that started with their 2007 album, Two Hunters. Here, they mix lengthy tracks with heavily…” |
| Uncut via Wikipedia | 4/5 | 80 | 2011 | |
| Mojo via Wikipedia | 4/5 | 80 | 2011 | |
| Clash via Wikipediaby Mike Diver | 8/10 | 80 | 2014 | “Wolves In The Throne Room – Celestite. Not particularly black, definitely not metal… But really rather brilliant.” |
| Drowned in Sound via Wikipediaby Noel Gardner | 8/10 | 80 | 2011 | “It’s largely futile to try and define Wolves in the Throne Room by the standards of American black metal, or the genre as a whole.” |
| Kerrang! via Wikipedia | 4/5 | 80 | 2011 |
Every Sunday: the week's new albums, scored by the critics. Plus our own reviews when we post them. Free, and one click to leave.
Celestial Lineage in Wolves in the Throne Room's catalog
More from Wolves in the Throne Room
← Earlier Diadem of 12 Stars (2006)Later → Thrice Woven (2017)
More Metal & Punk from around 2011
Would you spin it again?
Be the first to answer. Results show once 3 listeners weigh in.
How the Breakdown works
Every outlet’s score is converted to 0–100 (2/5 is 40, 5.9/10 is 59, a B+ is 88) and averaged. Grades follow the B-Side scale: A is 90–100, B 80–89, C 70–79, D 60–69, F below 60. Approval is the share of critics who scored it 75 or higher; the Breakdown shows green at 75 and up, red below. Divisiveness asks a different question: not how many critics liked it, but how close their scores are to each other. Five critics who all give it 50 are Unanimous, even though none of them liked it. The labels run Unanimous, Broad agreement, Some debate, Divided, and Contentious. Replay rate comes from listeners, not critics: yes counts fully, a few tracks counts half, no counts zero. The gist quotes each outlet’s own summary of its review. Published is the date on the review itself, read from the outlet’s page, so you can see whether an album’s reputation came at release or years later. Scores marked est. come from reviews that publish no number. Scores marked via Wikipedia are archive ratings, mostly for older albums, taken from the “Professional ratings” box on the album’s Wikipedia page (published openly through Wikidata); each links to the original review when we can find it online, and to that Wikipedia entry when we can’t. When an outlet reviewed an album twice, years apart (often for a reissue), both scores count, each labeled with its year.
A-Side marks the critics’ top tier. An album earns it automatically, from its numbers alone: a Breakdown of 90 or higher, from at least 5 reviews, with at least 75% approval. Nobody hands it out and nobody can buy it; if new reviews pull an album below the line, it loses the badge.






Leave a Reply