Early reviews. Critics give Thrice Woven an early B-Side Breakdown of 74 (C), from 7 reviews so far. It will settle as more outlets weigh in.
The verdict on Thrice Woven
4 of 7 critics liked it. A mixed reception.
- Highest 90 Sputnikmusic
- Lowest 52 Pitchfork
- Career #3 of Wolves in the Throne Room's 3 albums with a Breakdown
- By the numbers Wolves in the Throne Room's best-reviewed album here since Celestial Lineage (2011).
| The gist | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sputnikmusic via Wikipediaby Brett Tharp | 4.5/5 | 90 | 2017 | “Wolves in the Throne Room – Thrice Woven review: A triumphant return to black metal after a six year hiatus into ambient bliss, with homages to second wave black metal…” |
| The A.V. Club via Wikipediaby A.A. Dowd | B | 85 | 2017 | “Wolves In The Throne Room put the vicious black metal back into their eco-friendly sound” |
| PopMatters via Wikipediaby Spyros Stasis | 8/10 | 80 | 2017 | “Wolves in the Throne Room is without a doubt one of the leading black metal bands of the current US wave. Since the release of their 2006 debut album, A” |
| Louder via Wikipediaby Christina Wenig | 4/5 | 80 | 2017 | “Washington’s blackgaze pioneers return from the wilderness” |
| AllMusic via Wikipediaby Thom Jurek | 3.5/5 | 70 | 2017 | |
| Exclaim! via Wikipediaby Tom Piekarski | 6/10 | 60 | 2017 | |
| Pitchfork via Wikipediaby Andy O'Connor | 5.2/10 | 52 | 2017 | “On the follow-up to 2014’s electronic departure, Celestite, the Olympia band stumble in the attempt to find their way back to classic black metal.” |
Every Sunday: the week's new albums, scored by the critics. Plus our own reviews when we post them. Free, and one click to leave.
Thrice Woven in Wolves in the Throne Room's catalog
More from Wolves in the Throne Room
More Metal & Punk from around 2017
Would you spin it again?
Be the first to answer. Results show once 3 listeners weigh in.
How the Breakdown works
Every outlet’s score is converted to 0–100 (2/5 is 40, 5.9/10 is 59, a B+ is 88) and averaged. Grades follow the B-Side scale: A is 90–100, B 80–89, C 70–79, D 60–69, F below 60. Approval is the share of critics who scored it 75 or higher; the Breakdown shows green at 75 and up, red below. Divisiveness asks a different question: not how many critics liked it, but how close their scores are to each other. Five critics who all give it 50 are Unanimous, even though none of them liked it. The labels run Unanimous, Broad agreement, Some debate, Divided, and Contentious. Replay rate comes from listeners, not critics: yes counts fully, a few tracks counts half, no counts zero. The gist quotes each outlet’s own summary of its review. Published is the date on the review itself, read from the outlet’s page, so you can see whether an album’s reputation came at release or years later. Scores marked est. come from reviews that publish no number. Scores marked via Wikipedia are archive ratings, mostly for older albums, taken from the “Professional ratings” box on the album’s Wikipedia page (published openly through Wikidata); each links to the original review when we can find it online, and to that Wikipedia entry when we can’t. When an outlet reviewed an album twice, years apart (often for a reissue), both scores count, each labeled with its year.
A-Side marks the critics’ top tier. An album earns it automatically, from its numbers alone: a Breakdown of 90 or higher, from at least 5 reviews, with at least 75% approval. Nobody hands it out and nobody can buy it; if new reviews pull an album below the line, it loses the badge.






Leave a Reply