Diadem of 12 Stars

Wolves in the Throne Room – Diadem of 12 Stars: B-Side Breakdown 79 (C+) from 3 critic reviews.

Album cover for Diadem of 12 Stars by Wolves in the Throne Room
Released February 2006
Shop on AmazonAs an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.
Wolves in the Throne Room

Diadem of 12 Stars

79
B-Side BreakdownGrade C+ · 3 critics · 100% approval
B-Side Breakdown79Grade: C+
Approval100%3 of 3 critics scored it 75 or higher
DivisivenessUnanimousHow close the scores are: most critics land within 2 points of each other

Early reviews. Critics give Diadem of 12 Stars an early B-Side Breakdown of 79 (C+), from 3 reviews so far. It will settle as more outlets weigh in.

The verdict on Diadem of 12 Stars

So far, 3 of 3 critics liked it.

020406080100Pitchfork: 77Sputnikmusic: 80AllMusic: 80 Breakdown 79
The gist
Sputnikmusic via Wikipediaby Tyler Munro 4/5 80 2006 “Wolves in the Throne Room – Diadem of 12 Stars review: A USBM band that lives in the forest releases an album that's a lot better than it should be.…”
AllMusic via Wikipedia 4/5 80
Pitchfork via Wikipediaby Cory D. Byrom 7.7/10 77 2006 “Metal band blends elements of folk and goth to create a dark, haunting album that's as gorgeous as it is ugly.”

Diadem of 12 Stars in Wolves in the Throne Room's catalog

75Diadem of 12 Stars (2006): 7979This oneCelestial Lineage (2011): 8484Thrice Woven (2017): 74742017
Wolves in the Throne Room's albums by B-Side Breakdown, in release order. Above the dashed line, most critics liked it. Every Wolves in the Throne Room album, ranked

More from Wolves in the Throne Room

See all Wolves in the Throne Room albums ranked

More Metal & Punk from around 2006

Would you spin it again?

Be the first to answer. Results show once 3 listeners weigh in.

How the Breakdown works

Every outlet’s score is converted to 0–100 (2/5 is 40, 5.9/10 is 59, a B+ is 88) and averaged. Grades follow the B-Side scale: A is 90–100, B 80–89, C 70–79, D 60–69, F below 60. Approval is the share of critics who scored it 75 or higher; the Breakdown shows green at 75 and up, red below. Divisiveness asks a different question: not how many critics liked it, but how close their scores are to each other. Five critics who all give it 50 are Unanimous, even though none of them liked it. The labels run Unanimous, Broad agreement, Some debate, Divided, and Contentious. Replay rate comes from listeners, not critics: yes counts fully, a few tracks counts half, no counts zero. The gist quotes each outlet’s own summary of its review. Published is the date on the review itself, read from the outlet’s page, so you can see whether an album’s reputation came at release or years later. Scores marked est. come from reviews that publish no number. Scores marked via Wikipedia are archive ratings, mostly for older albums, taken from the “Professional ratings” box on the album’s Wikipedia page (published openly through Wikidata); each links to the original review when we can find it online, and to that Wikipedia entry when we can’t. When an outlet reviewed an album twice, years apart (often for a reissue), both scores count, each labeled with its year.

A-Side marks the critics’ top tier. An album earns it automatically, from its numbers alone: a Breakdown of 90 or higher, from at least 5 reviews, with at least 75% approval. Nobody hands it out and nobody can buy it; if new reviews pull an album below the line, it loses the badge.

Report a problem


Discover more from B-Side Guys

Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.

Tags:

Leave a Reply