Critics give The Friends of Rachel Worth a B-Side Breakdown of 78 (C+), from 9 reviews at outlets we track. Scores run 65 to 90.
The verdict on The Friends of Rachel Worth
6 of 9 critics liked it. A mixed reception.
| The gist | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Uncut via Wikipediaby Jerry Thackray | 4.5/5 | 90 | 2006 | |
| Entertainment Weekly via Wikipediaby Rob Brunner | B+ | 88 | 2000 | |
| Spin via Wikipediaby Eric Weisbard | 8/10 | 80 | 2000 | |
| Melody Maker via Wikipedia | 4/5 | 80 | 2006 | |
| NME via Wikipediaby John Robinson | 8/10 | 80 | 2000 | |
| The Guardian via Wikipediaby Maddy Costa | 4/5 | 80 | 2000 | |
| Rolling Stone via Wikipediaby Holly George-Warren | 3.5/5 | 70 | 2000 | |
| AllMusic via Wikipediaby Hal Horowitz | 3.5/5 | 70 | ||
| Pitchfork via Wikipediaby Meg Zamula | 6.5/10 | 65 | 2000 | “Once upon a time, everything the local "modern rock" station played sounded like The Friends of Rachel Worth. Before Papa …” |
Every Sunday: the week's new albums, scored by the critics. Plus our own reviews when we post them. Free, and one click to leave.
The Friends of Rachel Worth in The Go-Betweens's catalog
How these critics usually treat The Go-Betweens
- Rolling Stone Kinder than usual9 points below the other critics here. Usually 22 points below on The Go-Betweens's other albums (3).
- AllMusic Harsher than usual9 points below the other critics here. Usually 1 point above on The Go-Betweens's other albums (7).
- Uncut About usual for them13 points above the other critics here. Usually 6 points above on The Go-Betweens's other albums (6).
- NME About usual for them2 points above the other critics here. Usually 3 points below on The Go-Betweens's other albums (4).
- Entertainment Weekly About usual for them11 points above the other critics here. Usually 10 points above on The Go-Betweens's other albums (4).
More from The Go-Betweens
← Earlier 16 Lovers Lane (1988)Later → Bright Yellow Bright Orange (2003)
More Indie & Alternative from around 2000
Would you spin it again?
Be the first to answer. Results show once 3 listeners weigh in.
How the Breakdown works
Every outlet’s score is converted to 0–100 (2/5 is 40, 5.9/10 is 59, a B+ is 88) and averaged. Grades follow the B-Side scale: A is 90–100, B 80–89, C 70–79, D 60–69, F below 60. Approval is the share of critics who scored it 75 or higher; the Breakdown shows green at 75 and up, red below. Divisiveness asks a different question: not how many critics liked it, but how close their scores are to each other. Five critics who all give it 50 are Unanimous, even though none of them liked it. The labels run Unanimous, Broad agreement, Some debate, Divided, and Contentious. Replay rate comes from listeners, not critics: yes counts fully, a few tracks counts half, no counts zero. The gist quotes each outlet’s own summary of its review. Published is the date on the review itself, read from the outlet’s page, so you can see whether an album’s reputation came at release or years later. Scores marked est. come from reviews that publish no number. Scores marked via Wikipedia are archive ratings, mostly for older albums, taken from the “Professional ratings” box on the album’s Wikipedia page (published openly through Wikidata); each links to the original review when we can find it online, and to that Wikipedia entry when we can’t. When an outlet reviewed an album twice, years apart (often for a reissue), both scores count, each labeled with its year.
A-Side marks the critics’ top tier. An album earns it automatically, from its numbers alone: a Breakdown of 90 or higher, from at least 5 reviews, with at least 75% approval. Nobody hands it out and nobody can buy it; if new reviews pull an album below the line, it loses the badge.









Leave a Reply