The Friends of Rachel Worth

The Go-Betweens – The Friends of Rachel Worth: B-Side Breakdown 78 (C+) from 9 critic reviews.

Album cover for The Friends of Rachel Worth by The Go-Betweens
Released September 23, 2000
Shop on AmazonAs an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.
The Go-Betweens

The Friends of Rachel Worth

78
B-Side BreakdownGrade C+ · 9 critics · 67% approval
B-Side Breakdown78Grade: C+
Approval67%6 of 9 critics scored it 75 or higher
DivisivenessBroad agreementHow close the scores are: most critics land within 16 points of each other

Critics give The Friends of Rachel Worth a B-Side Breakdown of 78 (C+), from 9 reviews at outlets we track. Scores run 65 to 90.

The verdict on The Friends of Rachel Worth

6 of 9 critics liked it. A mixed reception.

  • Highest 90 Uncut
  • Lowest 65 Pitchfork
  • Reputation 77 85 at release, then five or more years later
  • By the numbers The lowest score of The Go-Betweens's 8 albums with a Breakdown.
020406080100Pitchfork: 65Rolling Stone: 70AllMusic: 70Spin: 80Melody Maker: 80NME: 80The Guardian: 80Entertainment Weekly: 88Uncut: 90 Breakdown 78
The gist
Uncut via Wikipediaby Jerry Thackray 4.5/5 90 2006
Entertainment Weekly via Wikipediaby Rob Brunner B+ 88 2000
Spin via Wikipediaby Eric Weisbard 8/10 80 2000
Melody Maker via Wikipedia 4/5 80 2006
NME via Wikipediaby John Robinson 8/10 80 2000
The Guardian via Wikipediaby Maddy Costa 4/5 80 2000
Rolling Stone via Wikipediaby Holly George-Warren 3.5/5 70 2000
AllMusic via Wikipediaby Hal Horowitz 3.5/5 70
Pitchfork via Wikipediaby Meg Zamula 6.5/10 65 2000 “Once upon a time, everything the local "modern rock" station played sounded like The Friends of Rachel Worth. Before Papa …”

The Friends of Rachel Worth in The Go-Betweens's catalog

75Before Hollywood (1983): 8080Spring Hill Fair (1984): 8383Liberty Belle and the Black Diamond Express (1986): 8686Tallulah (1987): 828216 Lovers Lane (1988): 8383The Friends of Rachel Worth (2000): 7878This oneBright Yellow Bright Orange (2003): 8282Oceans Apart (2005): 858519832005
The Go-Betweens's albums by B-Side Breakdown, in release order. Above the dashed line, most critics liked it. Every The Go-Betweens album, ranked

How these critics usually treat The Go-Betweens

  • Rolling Stone Kinder than usual9 points below the other critics here. Usually 22 points below on The Go-Betweens's other albums (3).
  • AllMusic Harsher than usual9 points below the other critics here. Usually 1 point above on The Go-Betweens's other albums (7).
  • Uncut About usual for them13 points above the other critics here. Usually 6 points above on The Go-Betweens's other albums (6).
  • NME About usual for them2 points above the other critics here. Usually 3 points below on The Go-Betweens's other albums (4).
  • Entertainment Weekly About usual for them11 points above the other critics here. Usually 10 points above on The Go-Betweens's other albums (4).

More from The Go-Betweens

See all The Go-Betweens albums ranked

More Indie & Alternative from around 2000

Would you spin it again?

Be the first to answer. Results show once 3 listeners weigh in.

How the Breakdown works

Every outlet’s score is converted to 0–100 (2/5 is 40, 5.9/10 is 59, a B+ is 88) and averaged. Grades follow the B-Side scale: A is 90–100, B 80–89, C 70–79, D 60–69, F below 60. Approval is the share of critics who scored it 75 or higher; the Breakdown shows green at 75 and up, red below. Divisiveness asks a different question: not how many critics liked it, but how close their scores are to each other. Five critics who all give it 50 are Unanimous, even though none of them liked it. The labels run Unanimous, Broad agreement, Some debate, Divided, and Contentious. Replay rate comes from listeners, not critics: yes counts fully, a few tracks counts half, no counts zero. The gist quotes each outlet’s own summary of its review. Published is the date on the review itself, read from the outlet’s page, so you can see whether an album’s reputation came at release or years later. Scores marked est. come from reviews that publish no number. Scores marked via Wikipedia are archive ratings, mostly for older albums, taken from the “Professional ratings” box on the album’s Wikipedia page (published openly through Wikidata); each links to the original review when we can find it online, and to that Wikipedia entry when we can’t. When an outlet reviewed an album twice, years apart (often for a reissue), both scores count, each labeled with its year.

A-Side marks the critics’ top tier. An album earns it automatically, from its numbers alone: a Breakdown of 90 or higher, from at least 5 reviews, with at least 75% approval. Nobody hands it out and nobody can buy it; if new reviews pull an album below the line, it loses the badge.

Report a problem


Discover more from B-Side Guys

Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.

Tags:

Leave a Reply