Critics give Mwng a B-Side Breakdown of 77 (Keeper), from 12 reviews at outlets we track. Scores run 60 to 90.
The verdict on Mwng
11 of 12 critics liked it, and they mostly agree.
- Highest 90 AllMusic
- Lowest 60 The Guardian
- Career Tied for #6 of Super Furry Animals's 8 albums with a Breakdown
| The gist | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| AllMusic via Wikipediaby Stephen Thomas Erlewine | 4.5/5 | 90 | ||
| Pitchfork in 2005 via Wikipediaby Marc Hogan | 8.2/10 | 82 | 2005 | |
| The Rolling Stone Album Guide via Wikipediaby Kembrew McLeod | 4/5 | 80 | 2004 | “Previously published as: Rolling Stone album guide” |
| Select via Wikipediaby Toby Manning | 4/5 | 80 | 2005 | |
| Q via Wikipediaby David Sheppard | 4/5 | 80 | 2005 | |
| NME via Wikipediaby Victoria Segal | 8/10 | 80 | 2000 | |
| Alternative Press via Wikipedia | 4/5 | 80 | 2005 | |
| Pitchfork in 2000 via Wikipediaby Matt LeMay | 7.9/10 | 79 | 2000 | “For a territory only slightly larger than New Jersey, Wales has done pretty well for itself.n Besides having its …” |
| PopMattersby Casey Hardmeyer | 7/10 | 70 | 2015 | “Mwng remains an oddity in Welsh art-rock group Super Furry Animals' catalogue. The reexamination of the album that is prompted by its 2015 reissue further” |
| Rolling Stone via Wikipediaby Barry Walters | 3.5/5 | 70 | 2000 | |
| Melody Maker via Wikipediaby Andre Paine | 3.5/5 | 70 | 2005 | |
| The Guardian via Wikipediaby Caroline Sullivan | 3/5 | 60 | 2000 |
Every Sunday: the week's new albums, scored by the critics. Plus our own reviews when we post them. Free, and one click to leave.
Mwng in Super Furry Animals's catalog
How these critics usually treat Super Furry Animals
- The Guardian Harsher than usual18 points below the other critics here. Usually 2 points below on Super Furry Animals's other albums (7).
- The Rolling Stone Album Guide Kinder than usual4 points above the other critics here. Usually 11 points below on Super Furry Animals's other albums (5).
- Q Kinder than usual4 points above the other critics here. Usually 10 points below on Super Furry Animals's other albums (6).
- AllMusic Kinder than usual15 points above the other critics here. Usually 4 points above on Super Furry Animals's other albums (7).
- Pitchfork About usual for them3 points above the other critics here. Usually 8 points above on Super Furry Animals's other albums (7).
- Rolling Stone About usual for them7 points below the other critics here. Usually 11 points below on Super Furry Animals's other albums (4).
More from Super Furry Animals
← Earlier Guerrilla (1999)Later → Rings Around the World (2001)
More Indie & Alternative from around 2000
Would you spin it again?
Be the first to answer. Results show once 3 listeners weigh in.
How the Breakdown works
Every outlet’s score is converted to 0–100 (2/5 is 40, 5.9/10 is 59) and averaged. A letter grade counts as the star rating it matches across thousands of reviews of the same albums, so a B+ is 75, like four stars, and a B is 65. Verdicts: Heavy Rotation is 85 and up, Keeper 70–84, Mixed Bag 55–69, Back of the Crate below 55. Approval is the share of critics who scored it 70 or higher (7/10, three and a half stars); the Breakdown shows green at 70 and up, red below. Divisiveness asks a different question: not how many critics liked it, but how close their scores are to each other. Five critics who all give it 50 are Unanimous, even though none of them liked it. The labels run Unanimous, Broad agreement, Some debate, Divided, and Contentious. Replay rate comes from listeners, not critics: yes counts fully, a few tracks counts half, no counts zero. The gist quotes each outlet’s own summary of its review. Published is the date on the review itself, read from the outlet’s page, so you can see whether an album’s reputation came at release or years later. Scores marked est. come from reviews that publish no number. Scores marked via Wikipedia are archive ratings, mostly for older albums, taken from the “Professional ratings” box on the album’s Wikipedia page (published openly through Wikidata); each links to the original review when we can find it online, and to that Wikipedia entry when we can’t. When an outlet reviewed an album twice, years apart (often for a reissue), both scores count, each labeled with its year.
A-Side marks the critics’ top tier. An album earns it automatically, from its numbers alone: a Breakdown of 90 or higher, from at least 5 reviews, with at least 75% approval. Nobody hands it out and nobody can buy it; if new reviews pull an album below the line, it loses the badge.








Leave a Reply